2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK Reviews

2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK SLK320 3.2L from North America

Model year2001
Year of manufacture2000
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2009
Engine and transmission 3.2L Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.3 / 10
Most recent distance171000 miles
Previous carMercedes-Benz E-Class

Summary:

SLK320 - amazing machine and lots of fun... not 230

Faults:

The only things that have gone wrong with the car are the power seats relay, and one of the doors hinges. Oh yeah the windshield, but that was from a rock on the freeway. I won't blame MB for that.

General Comments:

I have had other MBs in the past; E420, E320 and a 98 SL500. Even I liked the other models, I absolutely love the SLK. It is amazing and lots of fun with plenty of power. It looks beautiful with the top up or down. Plus it is a hard top.

I sold it recently with 171000 miles on it, and it still ran great. You could not tell how many miles it had unless you looked at the miles on the cluster.

If you are in the market to buy one, I would not recommend the 4 cylinder kompressor, they have more problems, don't sound or perform the same. Do some research. The V6 engine on the SLK320 will run forever, but the same I could not say for the 4 cylinder Kompresor. Test drive them both if you've got doubts.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 11th October, 2009

2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK 2.3 compressor from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission 2.3 compressor Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 0 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
3.8 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance11000 miles
Previous carMercedes-Benz SLK

Summary:

Overpriced death trap

Faults:

Computer operated braking system caused crash stops without warning making the car lethal.

General Comments:

This fault combined with the dealers attitude and inability to find the fault made driving the car like Russian roulette.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 11th July, 2003

2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK 320 3.2 petrol from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 3.2 petrol Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance22000 miles
Previous carBMW 3 Series

Summary:

This is a great high quality perfornace coupe/convertable

Faults:

At 10K the fan started to make a whining noise. I took it to the dealer who replaced it under warranty.

At 21K I had the front driving lights replaced, again under warranty, because they always had condensation in them after driving in the rain.

General Comments:

This is a great fun car. The V6 3.2L engine is lovely and smooth with great low down traction.

The roof comes down every time the sun comes out and has never missed a beat.

At 22K I still have around 3mm of tread wear on the original rear wheels. This is even with spirited driving.

This car can be made to fly and will out drag a 230 - don't let the stats on paper fool you into thinking there is little difference between them.

The gearbox took about 10K to smooth out when changing to/from the lower gears.

The build quality is superb.

The standard CD is OK. There aren't any really suitable places for a CD changer so I didn't bother.

The cabin accommodates 6 footers no problem. The seats are comfortable but lack decent lumbar support.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 25th June, 2003

2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK 230 2.3 Litre supercharged from North America

Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 2.3 Litre supercharged Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.6 / 10
Distance when acquired17 miles
Most recent distance10000 miles
Previous carOldsmobile Alero

Summary:

More of a gentleman's GT than a true sportscar, but one that exudes class and refinement

Faults:

Needed alignment after 50 miles. Dealer aligned under warranty.

Recalled for new emission sticker (no mechanical fault). Dealer installed in 5 minutes.

Roof "C" Pillar rubbing against trunk liner when roof was retracted. Dealer fixed by melting plastic trunk liner and depressing the liner while the plastic cooled. Fix worked, but plastic area is visually degraded in trunk.

Fuel gauge started registering 3/4 tank regardless of fuel condition. Dealer replaced fuel level sensor inside fuel tank.

Front passenger disc brake rotor badly scored with less than 1000 miles on vehicle. Dealer found some type of foreign material or debris inside the caliper. Dealer did not replace rotor.

Interior plastics are painted rather than being a solid color with the color contained within the plastic as in most cars. Paint is very soft and chips when contact is made with seatbelt latch, garment buttons, etc. In light colored interiors, these chips show the dark color of the base plastic. Dealer cannot repair, but will replace if they become excessive.

General Comments:

Folding metal hardtop puts this car above the competition from Porsche, Audi, and BMW. When the top is up, the vehicle looks and feels just like a coupe. The top is impervious to the weather and permits the car to use automatic carwashes. However, when the top is up, there is a massive blind spot on the driver's side.

The 2.3 Litre supercharged engine is a marvel of power and economy. I easily get 30 MPG on the highway and 22-24 in town while having power to spare. However, the engine noise is coarse and does not sound like a sports car. While some may think I was crazy, I prefer the supercharged 4 to the normally aspirated V6. The 2.3 litre engine is nearly a match for the V6 performance-wise and gets much better mileage.

The interior is gorgeous with real leather and polished aluminum accents everywhere. The instrument panel gauges are very classy and retro in appearance, and the two-tone black and tan interior of my vehicle looks great.

The seats have good lateral support, but are not comfortable on long-drives as they are fairly stiff and have almost no lumbar support. Expect to get out and stretch every few hours.

Overall, the car feels more solid and heavier than it really is, which is mostly a good thing. However, the steering uses recirculating ball design (same as older Buicks) and does not transmit much road feel to the driver.

The car handles extremely well, with flat cornering and grippy tires, but is not as exciting to drive as the BMW or Porsche. This is disapointing when you really want to feel like a speed racer, and great when you simply want to cruise with the top down.

I would say that one differentiator between the SLK and the other roadsters is that because of the solid feel and steering, you don't always feel like the car will dart away unless you watch it every second.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 13th March, 2003

Average review marks: 7.2 / 10, based on 7 reviews