| Model year | 2001 |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.5 liters Automatic |
| Performance marks | 1 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) |
1.0 / 10
|
| Distance when acquired | 4 miles |
| Most recent distance | 65800 miles |
| Previous car | Toyota Sequoia |
Summary:
Very good vehicle
Faults:
None.
General Comments:
This car is reliable. I didn't change the iridium spark plugs and transmission fluid. I just maintained the oil change. And until now it is running good.
However, I called for the 65K and timing belt service and they are not chip to begin with, it is around $1200.00.
Also the iridium spark plugs are running at $400.00 for all six.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 26th April, 2005
| Model year | 2001 |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) |
8.4 / 10
|
| Distance when acquired | 70000 miles |
Summary:
Buy a used one and be satisfied
Faults:
Washer fluid pump had to be replaced at 51K miles.
General Comments:
I love this truck.
The gas mileage is bad and the acceleration isn't great. If you want better gas mileage you shouldn't be buying an SUV anyway. The ride is very comfortable and the cabin noise is non-existent as long as the sunroof is closed. The acceleration is not 4-cyl bad, but not very good for a V6.
I bought used - 20K below new price.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 15th December, 2004
| Model year | 2001 |
| Year of manufacture | 2001 |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.5 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 9 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) |
8.6 / 10
|
| Distance when acquired | 60 miles |
| Most recent distance | 72000 miles |
| Previous car | Honda Accord |
Summary:
A solid SUV that has been bulletproof
Faults:
Front brake pads at 45,000 miles.
Rear brake pads at 70,000 miles.
General Comments:
This is an extremely reliable SUV that goes almost anywhere.
It is rattle free and the unibody construction gives it a very solid feel on the road.
However, I wish the motor was a little smoother and had more power.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 16th September, 2004
I, too, have a 2001 Mitsubishi Montero XLS. While the vehicle has performed admirably, I have 101,000 miles on it, the accessories leave much to be desired. In particular, the wheel cover. Mine is cracked and peeling, on a 2001 vehicle? Is this common to this vehicle and is the manufacturer recalling them? The fender covers also tend to dent and chip relatively easy. I have numerous chips on all four fenders. I do love the style and performance of this vehicle, overall, but their should be better accessory quality.
David Guzman
DGuzman@stic.net.
| Year of manufacture | 2001 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | V6 3.5 200hp Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 7 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 2 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) |
6.2 / 10
|
| Distance when acquired | 39000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 46000 miles |
| Previous car | Honda Accord |
Summary:
A solid truck with cheap accessories!
Faults:
The CD changer broke at 43000 miles.
The sunroof linkage broke at 41000.
The wheel cover faded and cracked at 43000.
Passenger side window going out at 44000.
General Comments:
The engine is solid, could be a little faster. The accessories are not built to last like cd changer, sunroof, power windows.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know
Review Date: 18th May, 2004
| Year of manufacture | 2001 |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 0 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 0 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 3 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 0 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 0 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) |
0.6 / 10
|
| Distance when acquired | 6 miles |
| Most recent distance | 44000 miles |
Summary:
Never Again!!
Faults:
Brakes replaced 3 times in 1 1/2 years.
CD player blew within a year.
Lifters shot in close to 3 years replaced them (not covered under warranty) engine still ticking.
Replaced engine block within 3 years, engine still ticking.
Replaced lifters again (now within 2 weeks) Lets see what happens. Truck currently in the shop for 9 weeks, and I'm paying for a rental.
General Comments:
I will never again purchase a Mitsubishi. The service is horrible. Not only is the Montero truly overpriced, but it isn't worth it. I've had nothing but problems from day one. It may look good from the outside but remember..never judge a book by it's cover! Good Luck out there.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 29th December, 2003
I own a 2001 Montero Ltd. I purchased it new. I have kept up all service due for the vehicle since I had the vehicle. It is a reliable vehicle and never had a problem with it. I also purchased the extended warranty. I only paid my $100 deductible on repair that could have cost me $600.00. I only have 53,000 miles. In my opinion, Mitsubishi made a good product.
Great vehicle. I have maintained it regularly and on schedule. Have over 100,00 miles and no problems other thatn normal maintenance: brakes, tires, and battery.
Had one prior to this without any problems. Would recommend to any one.
I purchased a 2001 Mitsubishi Montero Limited new. During my ownership, I never experienced any out of the ordinary problems. I had all minor and major check ups on time at the dealer.
The engine does need a margin more oomph. (Nissan has a 3.5 engine churning out 300 hp without charging it.)
Interior quality could use some advice from Honda, but satisfactory for the moment.
OE brakes and tires can last up to 65,000 miles if you drive conservatively.
This Mits vehicle is our family's eighth. All previous models performed reliably and up to satisfactory levels.
Summary: Keep your Mitsubishi maintained, and it will run like a loyal Golden Retriever.