1996 Nissan Skyline Reviews - Page 2 of 2

1996 Nissan Skyline GTS25 Series II 2.5L petrol (non-turbo) from Australia and New Zealand

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 2.5L petrol (non-turbo) Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.3 / 10
Distance when acquired52000 kilometres
Most recent distance64000 kilometres
Previous carHolden Commodore

Summary:

An absolute bargain for the insurance-challenged

Faults:

The input shaft bearing on the gearbox was somewhat whiny when I got the car. Since then, all gearbox bearings have been replaced (under warranty) and the noise is still there. It seems that this is an inherent, but totally benign issue (a number of other Skylines I have been in have the same noise). It is not a reliability issue.

Rear spoiler-mounted brake light does not work.

General Comments:

Handling is THE major strong point of this car. It has a very neutral turn-in and LOADS of grip. You can keep your foot buried almost all the way through the corner and still stick to the road, with mild oversteer on the corner exit. When the tail does break loose, it is extremely forgiving and progressive, and can be brought back into line (if you really want to) very easily. Body roll is minimal, even with stock-standard suspension and bump absorption is actually better than my last car, a VR Commodore with standard suspension.

The motor is an absolute jewel, but it needs at least 4000rpm on board to be in the least bit interesting. Low-down torque it does not have. Still, it is more than willing to rev to the 7000rpm redline/cut-out and sounds brilliant all the way (I have a 2.5" aftermarket exhaust fitted). You will need to make good use of the somewhat notchy gearbox to wring the best out of this motor. I would not call it a quick car. The bottom line: it needs a turbo. However, if your insurance company says that you can't have a turbo, this is still a very nice motor.

Apart from the noisy gearbox (only really apparent at standstill in neutral with the clutch out) and the non-functional spoiler-mounted brake light (due to a blown LED), this car has had no problems whatsoever. I would still recommend replacing the camshaft belt if you are at all unsure of when it has last been changed. Don't forget that many (most?) privately-imported cars have had the odometers wound back... possibly several times.

The interior is a little dark, but the updated Series II dash has aged gracefully. The climate-control air-conditioning is magnificent! The driver's seat is quite supportive, and the width is adjustable to cater for a range of drivers.

Fuel consumption is around 11-12L/100km, but then I tend to rev the sweet-singing motor out rather a lot :) Expect better consumption with a lighter foot. 98-octane premium unleaded petrol is highly recommended.

Overall, for the price I paid (AU$20,000), it is still unbeatable value; unless you look at the GTS25 turbo...

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 25th March, 2003

21st Mar 2004, 02:57

I have a 1997 Skyline GTST Series II and reading your comment on your fuel economy makes me think that the turbo is worth the extra couple of litres/100kms. I get about 13-15L/100kms. I agree with everything in your review, especially the use of 98-octane premium unleaded petrol, not the 95-octane premium unleaded petrol used in the cheaper petrol stations.

13th Apr 2004, 05:03

I'm another GTS-T Series II owner from the UK.

All the comments above, I do agree with, though I would say to keep your foot buried on corners in the turbo version is a little dangerous, as I found out to my expense. Saying that, the handling of the car is outstanding, the GTS-T is a quick car in it's standard form, but what makes it a great car is the fact it is tune-able to stupid amounts of horsepower if you wish, though I recommend only taking it to 400 BHP if you want your engine to remain bulletproof i.e. not have engine issues.

16th Jun 2007, 23:18

Hi I have a R33 97 Skyline Series 2 in regards to your fuel consumption comment my car is approximately doing 17 - 20 L/ 100kms is that normal? how can you guys get very good fuel economy, should I get it checked out?

14th Nov 2008, 15:21

I was looking through all of your comments. I really want to get an R33 series 2 turbo, but am very conscious about the whole petrol consumption.

Average review marks: 8.3 / 10, based on 4 reviews