1961 Oldsmobile Cutlass F-85 from North America - Comments

26th Apr 2008, 02:23

"Compact power, young executive's mustang-killer"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Intermittent vapor lock problems.

General comments?

The Oldsmobile Cutlass F-85 was my very first car; oddly enough, I bought it before I even knew how to drive. I bought for $1200 off a guy who worked on the railroad, a real 'cream-puff' (the car, not the guy). As a neophyte I didn't know what the hell I had--the pick-up (acceleration) on this car was impressive, even with the 2-barrel carb (let alone the 4-barrel) --it really threw you back into the seat, and one had to be quite careful on the throttle. The car was fast off the line and the top end was great too--I don't think I ever topped it out, probably 115 mph was the highest I hit, and the car could cruise all day at 85 mph. This light aluminum engine was nicknamed the 'Rocket'--but in this instance the marketing hype matched the reality. I later found out from a southerner that they made these things into stock-cars.

The early sixties in America saw a brief flurry of mid-size cars and the Cutlass F-85 was one of them. Too bad the trend of a powerful, low-slung, and well-handling (by traditional US standards) luxurious mid-size died out--when I was driving the F-85 in the mid 80s, though a quarter century old, it had more punch and equal handling with the 'new generation' Mustangs or Thunderbirds that were coming out.


28th Apr 2008, 16:22

"Engine and transmission 283 V8 Automatic"

- If that's what that 1961 F-85 had, then someone put a Chevrolet 283 in there.

Vote:

28th Apr 2008, 21:24

Ah well, it was a long time ago. it had eight cylinders anyways...

Vote:

1st Feb 2009, 17:11

No it was not a Chevrolet 283 it was a V8, all aluminum block, very lightweight. My Dad special ordered a new '61 with a standard (3 speed), long throw transmission mounted on the steering stalk, very inefficient for any kind of competition. The suspension was also extremely soft, causing it to ride like a marshmallow. Its light weight made it very fast off the line, however.

Vote:

3rd Feb 2009, 06:25

The V8 in the '61 F85 was a 215 cubic inch, pretty dinky for a V8 even by today's standards...

Vote:

25th Jun 2009, 21:07

"The V8 in the '61 F85 was a 215 cubic inch, pretty dinky for a V8 even by today's standards..."

What with variable valve timing, direct injection, DOHC, supercharging & today's electronics, a 215 cubic inch engine could put out close to 400 HP.

Vote:

26th Jun 2009, 13:10

215 cubic inches is approximately 3.5 liters. Most modern engines with that displacement are going to be six-cylinders, not V8's. A few exceptions would be the Mercedes 3.5 liter V8, and the Rover 3500, which was actually the same engine as used in the F-85.

Vote:

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Oldsmobile Cutlass reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews