1991 Renault Clio Reviews

1991 Renault Clio RT 1.4 from Malta

Year of manufacture1991
First year of ownership1991
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 1.4 Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired5 miles
Most recent distance60000 miles
Previous carRenault Renault 20 TS

Summary:

Good all rounder

Faults:

Nothing spectacular, but with time I now have to replace the window rubber, but nothing spectacular, but have to stop the rain water seeping in.

To see to the air blower.

The seats are still acceptable so far as well.

General Comments:

Generally a very good and reliable car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 21st December, 2007

1991 Renault Clio 1.2 RN 1.2 petrol from Bulgaria

Model year1991
Year of manufacture1991
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 1.2 petrol Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.8 / 10
Distance when acquired80000 kilometres
Most recent distance100000 kilometres
Previous carVolkswagen Golf

Summary:

An example for a good city car

Faults:

I have only changed the front bearings. That was all!!! For two years I have changed only oil, filters, tires and brake pads.

General Comments:

The Clio was a perfect car for me – for the city center and small trips! Small, agile, low consumption, reliable... I can only dream my next car will be like this.

The only thing was that it is only for the town. Not stable enough for the highway.

I recommend it to anyone who is looking for a cheap small city car, still with a spacious interior!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 13th February, 2006

1991 Renault Clio RT 1.4 petrol from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1991
First year of ownership1996
Most recent year of ownership1998
Engine and transmission 1.4 petrol Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired45000 miles
Most recent distance73000 miles
Previous carVolkswagen Polo

Summary:

An excellent small hatchback

Faults:

Window motor on driver's side failed at 62,000 miles.

Power steering pump became faulty and had to be replaced at 68,000 miles.

Broke down four times during last six months of ownership.

General Comments:

Proved itself to be a reliable and solid little car through two years of heavy use, but towards the end started to show its age. Good value at £3,000 for a 5 year old hatchback. Sold it 2 years later for £1,800. Next owner kept it for 6 years and it was virtually fault-free.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 3rd January, 2006

1991 Renault Clio RT 1.4 from UK and Ireland

Model year1992
Year of manufacture1991
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 1.4 Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.5 / 10
Distance when acquired82000 miles
Most recent distance92000 miles

Summary:

The BEST first car you can buy

Faults:

Starter Motor and Alternator failed totally after owning it for just over a year. I managed to keep the starter motor working for just under a year by hitting it with a hammer to loosen the solenoid.

Exhaust needed to be replaced when I brought it.

Faults experienced with both heater controls and wind screen washers.

General Comments:

Overview:

I brought my 1992 Clio 1.4 RT as my first car in spring 2003 for £300. It had been off the road for nearly a year so it needed a little TLC. The car was in an average condition, but had a few minor knocks and scratches which annoyed mew for the whole time I owned it.

When compared to what else I could have brought for the money this was an extremely good car. I had electric windows, electric mirrors and colour coded bumpers. All I needed to do to it to make it road worthy was change the exhaust from the catalytic converter back, tax and mot it.

The Clio has great looks and even thought the shape is now 15 years old. I did think it was a bit of a girl’s car, although no more than a Corsa or Fiesta. To try and tackle this I added some Renault 5 GTT alloys which I brought from the scrap yard and a 3 inch bore exhaust trim. My Clio had very comfortable cloth seats and also the original two spoke steering wheel.

Performance:

The 1.4 RT has a 1390cc engine which produces 80bhp and 107N/m of torque. This basically meant that it was pretty quick for a first car accelerating to 60mph in just over 12 seconds. The top speed was probably close to 120mph although I only got it to 115. It was very unstable at this speed and I strong recommend that no one takes one of these over 90mph.

The big let down of the Clio was the brakes. I am quite a hard driver at times and I like to go fast. The 1.4 could get going quite quickly, but was rubbish at stopping. I often had the wheels locking up and tyre smoke bellowing from the tyres because I had charged into a corner or junction too fast. Luckily for me I did manage to stop in time and the police never saw!

The Clio is rather rattly at low revs, but when it is driven hard it makes a lovely whining noise and sounds like a high performance motor! It can handle abuse extremely well. I used to thrash mine daily and I didn’t have any real problems.

The handling is excellent due to the chassis design. You can really chuck it about and have some fun.

Problems:

The only real problems I encountered with the 1.4 were to do with the starter and alternator. Both failed to work properly although I managed to get the starter to last an extra year (by hitting it with a hammer every morning to loosen the solenoid!). I had to replace them 9 months or so before I sold it. This was a very difficult job because of the awkward design of the Clio’s engine bay.

I also needed to change the exhaust as soon as I brought it, but other than that the only other costs were oil, spark plugs and a cam belt change.

The 3rd speed on the heater NEVER worked. The switch didn’t seem to do anything. I managed to get it to work on the slower speeds, but they were not as good for demisting. Also a few months before I sold it the washer jets got stuck and even when the water tank was empty the pump kept screaming away. I had to turn the car off three times and fill the tank with water again to get it to stop. –That’s French electrics for you. The car also ate rear brake light bulbs. I had to change them four times.

Running Costs:

• More expensive to insure than 1.1 and 1.2 cars, but well worth it for the handling and extra speed. It wasn’t exactly that expensive either at group 5.

• The road tax was about £110 per year.

• It costs about £25 to fill it up and it does 40mpg. I used to get just under 100miles per £10 (1/4 tank) driving normal for me (So occasional high revving and generally not that careful about saving fuel)

Overall:

This was truly a great car and I strongly recommend that people buy one as their first car. The Phase II and Phase III models are the ones to go for as the little annoying faults will have been rectified on these models.

I only sold mine because I wanted something faster and in better condition and upgraded to a 1.8 16V phase II version which is even better.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 29th May, 2005

27th Jun 2005, 12:40

Nice review!

Hope your having fun in the valver (i know I am in mine) 1.4 rt are okay, but 1.8 16v is in a totally different league!

Average review marks: 6.9 / 10, based on 14 reviews