2005 Subaru Outback Reviews - Page 2 of 3

2005 Subaru Outback 3.0R Sedan 3.0 gas from North America

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 3.0 gas Automatic
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.3 / 10
Distance when acquired24000 miles
Most recent distance42000 miles
Previous carAudi 90

Summary:

Good car

Faults:

I am the second owner. The issues below are not car specific diseases generally speaking. They are strange for the 2 year old car.

1. Wheels - $700. You can find them cheaper. I replaced them with the same model because the original ones were worn.

2. Rear ball bearing - $300. That was completely unexpected. The car ran with that issue almost 4 months before I got the time to fix it.

3. Front light bulbs - 2 x $15. Actually I had to replace a single bulb, but I could not find the original brand (Phillips), so I decided to replace both of them (GE).

General Comments:

I lived in upstate NY when purchased the car and had trips to canoe. For wet/slippery/minor off-road conditions, this car behaved even better than Audi 90 Quattro I had before. Then I drove to NYC and back the whole winter, and this car never put in a spot. Even with broken ball bearing.

Now I am riding at town only and it eats too much gas (look at the specs overview at edmunds.com).

What I do not like:

1. Inefficient transmission. I suppose the inefficiency of the transmission is the primary reason for the high gas consumption. If you want to dart away at a traffic light, it will use the 2nd speed to accelerate up to 50mph. If you let's say for a some reason want to speed up in the high speed traffic, it will do it at 3rd speed, though 4th speed is enough. I have a strong feeling that the transmission was designed for slow riding.

2. Lag in the transmission. It is waiting for something. Is it for safety?

3. It is narrow, it is not enough space for the rear seats. This car has enough power to have a roomy cabin and trunk.

4. Rear passenger seats are not convertible.

5. Front passenger seat has only 4 ways to control its position.

6. Gas. It requires at least 91. I do not see it last half of a year.

What do I like:

1. The transmission has "pseudo-manual" option. It is not convenient after the classic manual transmission, but it is good for the acceleration. There is no such automatic transmission that can beat a manual one.

2. Car handling. Even on jerky turns and maneuvers, it is under control. I had only a problem at snow storm when I was between a bus and a truck, and only a lane where we were.

3. Brakes. No comments.

4. Engine. No comments.

5. Control panel. It is very simple and it has only the things you have to see.

6. High clearance. No comments.

7. Rear spoiler. It is useless actually, but at night the cars behind will not blind you due to the spoiler. Though it does not work for some trucks. This is very efficient against "know-alls" using high intensive front lights and not thinking about others. You know what I mean.

What I cannot evaluate:

1. Sound. Occasionally I found a sub-woofer under the driver's seat. I am not a music fan, but it sounds great.

2. Some people say that the maintenance is expensive.

It is quite hard to answer; would I choose the same car the next time? It is not a family (3+) car definitely. If I do not have a family, I would choose it again. Though I have seen that even old retirees like the Outback wagon. But it was upstate NY and the stuff making life diverse (snow storms, heavy showers etc). In NYC, the same people prefer full size sedans from Ford, Mercury, Saturn and Lincoln.

I will pity it when I'm going to sell it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 24th October, 2008

2005 Subaru Outback LL Bean 3.0 from North America

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2004
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 3.0 Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.6 / 10
Distance when acquired19000 miles
Most recent distance23000 miles
Previous carMazda Protege

Summary:

This is a high quality car with a lot to offer the middle to high end driver

Faults:

Have had to replace OEM tires - as usual, they just don't stand up.

General Comments:

For an AWD wagon, the Outback 3.0 is a great handler both on the highway and rougher roads. Yes, it has a firm ride, but what AWD doesn't? The 3L gives the car a real boost, and you DO pay for it on fuel consumption - a lighter foot will give you 25 mpg or better. Have just driven the car up the entire eastern seaboard and into Canada - all systems worked perfectly. The huge sunroof is superb - never seen one this size in a small car,...and, no leaks, even with some of our heaviest rains. Tires/wheels could be an issue for some - I don't think Subaru had to go with 17" rims, as this really puts the price up on replacements (have found a 16" alternative for my winters that works great!).

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 24th February, 2008

Average review marks: 8.0 / 10, based on 8 reviews