2006 Suzuki Jimny Reviews

2006 Suzuki Jimny JLX+ 1.3 VVT from UK and Ireland

Model year2006
Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 1.3 VVT Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.8 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance9000 miles
Previous carSuzuki Ignis

Summary:

Lethal on-road handling, rolled and written off

Faults:

Retaining clip stud on Suzuki rubber floor mat broken.

*** Update ***

NOW ROLLED OVER AND WRITTEN OFF.

Slight rattle in drivers door.

Minor oil leak/smell of burning oil from transmission.

Stone chips.

NSF tyre needing imminent replacement as outer edge worn.

General Comments:

What a surprise! After reading 50 or so reports on this car, I was expecting a basic, capable off roader which would be OK on short journeys, terrible on motorways and have poor economy. I thought it would be useful, but frustrating in many ways. Not so...

I am most impressed with it, and have actually started to enjoy driving again.

It has the sort of x-factor that is hard to define, which has got me smiling again, and even talking to the thing!

It has a character, lost on many new cars, and is easy to live with day to day. Other Jimny owners wave too!

The JLX+ is a newly released special edition with metallic, air con and part leather, otherwise the same as the new facelift JLX. (The basic Jimny only gets a nasty cheap plastic steering wheel and hard headrests, not the leather rim and softer leather headrests on the JLX+.)

I was disappointed that the DDIS engine was unavailable in the UK, but have been pleasantly surprised by the 1.3 VVT unit, which is set up to pull from tickover and is smooth below 4000 rpm. It suits a driving approach similar to driving the diesel, with quick upchanges and low revs. On long uphills, revs are needed, but this does not upset it.

The big surprise was motorway driving; it still pulls at 100 mph (sat-nav verified/109mph on speedo), but this requires very high revs. It prefers to amble quietly at 70mph all day, and this is more comfortable, safer and more stable than I ever thought it would be.

The good build quality is evident throughout, with no rattles, good panel fit, and smooth operation of components. The new integral Clarion sourced CD player is excellent and gives very clear sound. The new dash is concise, clear and well lit, with a pleasant glow from the satin rims of the clocks, and an Audi-esque feel to the centre console particularly at night, with the red backlighting.

The excellent mirrors are electric, and heated, and are so big that blind spot mirrors are unnecessary. With the twin bright reversing lights, manoeuvering even at night is easy.

The car is easy to live with, having soft touch controls, sensibly sited (NB indicators/beams on RHS of wheel). It is easy to get in and out of, particularly for the elderly (the leather edged seats are easy to slide into) and there is excellent visibility meaning you can see the view over the hedges, and see over the car in front.

I am impressed by the way it can do so many things, so well. It is magnificent off road, with the push button low ratio box, good ground clearance and very light kerb weight. I have been aghast at what I have gone through in it-foot deep mud, rivers, snow drifts, very steep gravel tracks etc. It's narrow girth means you can avoid some of the worst parts of the tracks that the big off roaders have to go through, and the light weight has given me much amusement by allowing me to fly past kitted up Shoguns that have sunk in the mud!!

Back on road, it is quiet, capable and relaxing to drive, with adequate torque, well spaced gear ratios and a smooth 'box.

All road types are enjoyable, even motorways; it really is quite capable and even serene (if you avoid the pot holes). I can drive mine smoothly enough to allow my girlfriend to fall asleep in it!

It can also be hustled along nicely when needed, with the Variable Valve Timing engine at higher revs, but do remember that it is light, tall and narrow, and is rear wheel drive when in two wheel drive mode.

As such, I would not recommend it for novices, or unskilled and heavy footed drivers, due to its ability to oversteer if driven too hard, especially on greasy islands. A skilled driver will have no problem, and enjoy pushing the envelope. This is not a fault in the design, put the truth of physics, and applies to all SUVs; don't drive it on road like a Porsche, just like you wouldn't drive a Porsche across a peat bog and into a river. It's common sense!

Minor points that could be improved are the lack of underseat drawers, wasted storage space in the cabin and narrow door pockets.

It is best thought of as a two seater with occasional rear seats, as the rear seat are comfortable, but frustrating to get to, and the boot is small, but with a boot liner is just the right size to stop things moving about on corners.

The Jimny is an old model, first launched in '98, and after such a long run, it seems thoroughly sorted and prefectly engineered. The facelifted model is far more up to date with a better engine, transmission, seats and dash.

I am getting 36mpg average, with a mixture of off road use, fast motorway use, cruising and spirited B-road driving, which I think is remarkable for this type of car.

If you think it is just a cutesy hairdressers car, drive one and see what you think. I was so impressed, I bought one.

I am also very glad that I did. It's easy to live with, relaxing to drive, capable, astonishing off-road, and has good economy too. I am surprised!

*** Update ***

Further to the above- now covered 4,000 miles in 2 months with no issues whatsoever.

I ordered a paint-stick on delivery to deal with stone chips caused by fast lorries in our rural stony lanes, but the dealer says they have 56 on back-order and delivery may take six months!! As helpful as ever, they offered to get the chips touched in by their paint-shop free of charge- they can mix the paint colour and put some in a jar for me to take home too.

The car has been used both on and off road aggressively and runs like a Swiss watch.

For a four wheel drive it is exemplary, but is expensive to run compared to a supermini (eg Corsa) with £150 road tax and 37mpg. My brother's Citroen C1 is larger inside, has 5 doors, does 60+mpg with only £40 per year road tax. If you don't need 4WD, there are better options...!

I have found it to be versatile in any situation, even usable at a steady high speed on the motorway, however I now avoid every pothole though as these do jar the ride.

*** Update ***

I now write to say that I now understand the worries about handling and stability.

I have owned 51 cars and 20 motorbikes, and cover a high annual mileage. I hold a coach licence, a car licence and a motorbike licence, and have had extensive training on a skid pan, and I have used both front and rear wheel drive cars on a track. I am familiar with the instability of high four-wheel drive vehicles and drive according to the conditions. I have (had!) seven years no-claims bonus.

In a line of slow traffic, I exited an island onto a dual carriageway and changed up from 2nd to 3rd at approx 25mph. While doing so, I hit a grease patch and the rear of the car unexpectedly and wildly flung out, broadsiding me along the road. Using my training, I gently steered into the skid, but could not recover control and hit the kerb with the offside rear wheel at approx 15mph. The car immediately rolled over twice and landed on the driver's side, necessitating an escape out of the boot.

I am aghast as to how easily this car rolled over at such a slow speed, causing so much damage.

The Jimny is a total loss, with every panel damaged. The roof did stand up well to the impact, allowing both doors to be opened when winched back upright, but the driver's seat collapsed dangerously and the car lost all of it's fluids across the road.

The contents of the boot, owing to the lack of a parcel shelf, liberated themselves around the car to give the effect of being stuck in a washing machine full of bricks. My Tom-Tom navigation unit jumped off its mount and clobbered me in the face too.

I previously commented that I would not recommend the car to a novice, but after this, I would not recommend it to anyone who wants to use it extensively on the road, rather than off it.

So to sum the car up:

Positive: well built, reliable, good dealers, truly astounding off-road capabilities, good turning circle, cheap to buy, endearing.

Negative: dated technology and safety equipment, thirsty (30-37mpg), hairy in the wet, unstable with four people on board, catastrophic stability on greasy surfaces, rolls over very easily.

I now understand why the Jimny is not imported into America - they would sue!!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 4th September, 2006

23rd Oct 2006, 15:11

The Jimny got some bad press here in Sweden, one flipped over during a "elk-test" same test the Mercedes A-klasse failed.

31st Oct 2006, 20:32

I can only agree with your comments about the handling.

I had a 2006 model (hardtop) on loan recently while my ute was getting some engine work done, and I can only say that the handling is evil.

I thought the old F25 Daihatsu tray top I had was unstable, but compared to the Jimny it was actually pretty good.

For such a nice looking and well kitted out vehicle it's a big disappointment.

To me the problem seems to be that the front end is too soft, and with possibly unequal suspension travel (longer) front to rear and a short wheelbase, the front end feels like it wants to kneel, or tuck under at the slightest provocation, and I suspect lift a rear wheel in the process. You can feel serious weight transfer happening on even moderate corners.

The F25 with military tires on wet tarmac was damn scary, but I think the Jimny would be just as lethal given its unstable nature. Throw in the over assisted power steering and its pretty skittish at freeway speeds. No wonder it failed the Moose Test in Norway.

Most short wheelbase vehicles are inherently unstable, but I think Suzuki need to seriously stiffen the suspension or antiroll geometry to get it close to satisfactory.

The package would then be pretty good.

For an off road vehicle the ground clearance and underside is OK. The only glaringly obvious bit of bad design is that the flexible brake lines clipped to the front suspension trailing links are very exposed, and look to be prize candidates to be ripped off by a half decent bit of undergrowth.

Pitty really, coz at 6'2" I fit it comfortably, and the vehicle looks the goods.

2006 Suzuki Jimny JLX+ 1.3 petrol from UK and Ireland

Model year2006
Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 1.3 petrol Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.8 / 10
Distance when acquired9 miles
Most recent distance9 miles

Summary:

Yes I would buy another and have found no serious problems yet

General Comments:

This car so far is fun to drive.

It handles very well on the road, but have not tried it off road.

I feel quite safe when cornering and do not feel any body roll from the vehicle so perhaps the "Unstable on the road" tag is only a rumour. The negatives are no light in the rear of the vehicle and don't go thinking there is plenty of boot space.

Therefore a roof box would be an advantage as space is limited.

Apart from that this is a fun vehicle to drive and not too heavy on the fuel if you're not too heavy on the accelarator.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th August, 2006

31st Aug 2006, 02:56

I wrote the other JLX+ report and read yours with interest.

Interestingly, the handling and stability has improved on mine as the tyres have worn in. However I now need a new front tyre as it has worn on the outside edge, and this is not down to tracking as it has been checked.

If you drive this car as it was designed to do, then it is perfectly stable, however on greasy roads in 2WD mode, the driven rear wheels will step out and cause over-steer if you are too enthusiastic with the throttle and steering at the same time.

I have driven with three adult passengers, and due to the increase in the centre of gravity, the car becomes very unwieldy and verging on dangerous.

This is owing to the short and narrow wheelbase, the agricultural suspension and very high centre of gravity. Not recommended for anything other than very short distances.

I increase the boot space by leaving the rear seats down. It is a shame that the head restraints have to be removed to do this. This is because they are an old style, not the new integrated type ones like in the 2006 Wagon R+.

If you fold the seats down, the interior light also lights the boot area!

I would absolutely avoid a roof box, as this will increase the height of the centre of gravity, and cause weaving due to increased wind resistance, and also exaggerate the handling and stability problems as indicated above.

I do find the Jimny to be fun and enjoyable to use on road, and get between 30-37 mpg, dependant on type of use and whether I use the air-con or not.

It comes into it's own off road, and this is where it excels. I live with the bumpiness, handling and lack of cabin space on road to have this amazing capability off road, which I use regularly because of the work I do.

If you don't need it off road, was this the right car for you to buy? If I could cope with less ability in the rough, I would have had the diesel SX4 which is far and away better to drive on road, larger and more economical.

Glad to see you give yours 10/10 for reliability, mine has been good. Just going in for the 9,000 mile service, and need an oil leak on the transmission sorting.

Otherwise 100%.

22nd Oct 2006, 15:36

What's the latest update with how the Jimny is performing, any problems or difficulties with it? I'd be interested to know about the handling in the wet and any views on motorway driving.

23rd Oct 2006, 11:01

The comment previous to yours were written by myself, who wrote the "Lethal on road handling" 2006 Jimny report. These Jimnys are beautifully built, with great reliability, but should be restricted to off-road or limited and careful on-road use, due to their poor stability and dynamics.

If you buy one for its agricultural capability, not its ability as a car, you will be fine. If you need on road safety, buy an SX4 instead, as it is infinitely more stable.

The Jimny's rear wheel drive in two wheel drive mode, with off road biased tyres, and no weight over the rear axle is an inherently unstable set up. You CANNOT USE 4WD on tarmac AT ALL without damaging the transmission.

It would have been a better and more stable design to have been designed as being front wheel drive in 2wd mode.

I am still reeling from just how easily this car rolled, in traffic, at such a slow speed, and how lucky I was to have avoided landing side-on the crash barrier, which would certainly have killed me.

Make a good choice!

26th Nov 2008, 07:19

You can use a Jimny in 4wd on the road, but only in slippery conditions ie snow, ice, gravel. It can be engaged into 4wd on the move.

Average review marks: 7.3 / 10, based on 2 reviews