1997 Volkswagen Caravelle 2.5 petrol from Australia and New Zealand

Summary:

Heavy and thirsty

Faults:

Coolant reservoir cap... keeps breaking.

Key lock needs to be replaced.

Battery replaced.

Gear stick jammed. Need to replace.

Coolant leaks, engine oils leaks. A few places... but not much.

The fuel sender had a problem. Replaced with a 2nd hand unit, and now the fuel pump needs to be replaced.

Cruise control not working.

General Comments:

It is 2.5 petrol auto. Very heavy. It goes when it passes 3rd gear.

Very heavy van, but very, very roomy. Very high... you can see pretty much everything around.

Very thirsty. It drinks petrol.

8 seater. Great people mover, but it is heavy.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 25th October, 2012

1997 Volkswagen Caravelle 2.6i from South Africa

Summary:

A very useful camper van

Faults:

The front brakes have had to be replaced.

All the belts on the engine were replaced, as the vehicle stood in the previous owner's garage for 2 years.

Radio no longer worked, and has been replaced with a new unit.

Small oil leak from engine was cured by changing the oil and fitting a new oil filter. There have been no more oil leaks since then.

Other than that, the car starts every time, and is able to pull any load.

General Comments:

The car is quick for a van, as it has an Audi 5 cylinder 2.6 engine (100KW) fitted from the factory.

It has very comfortable cloth seats all round, and easily fits 12 adults.

Very high ground clearance ensures some off road capability, even though this car is rear wheel drive.

The engine bay is somewhat cramped, and makes servicing a little painful on the hands, as it is located at the back of the car.

The car has average fuel consumption (10L/100km) on long trips, but for the amount of people and luggage it can take, I think it is a fair balance.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th January, 2012

2nd Jan 2015, 18:08

How much does it cost? I am in Cape Town. I've seen the same model with low mileage.

1988 Volkswagen Caravelle GL 2.1L fuel injected Wasserboxer from Australia and New Zealand

Summary:

More expensive than you think

Faults:

Engine studs corroded requiring engine rebuild/replacement.

Fuel tank corroded requiring replacement.

Rust spots under windshield.

Corroded exhaust.

Leaks, leaks, leaks - oil, coolant, brake fluid, power steering fluid... you name it.

Other general problems as you'd expect from a van this age.

General Comments:

These are probably the highest quality vans of this age you can get. My Caravelle drives like a Rolls Royce and is extremely versatile. Very few other vehicles would be equally at home on a campground, moving furniture around the city, and bussing 8 people to a footy game. Materials are generally high quality, and the build quality is good. They are made like tanks.

On the other hand, they are demanding and expensive to keep on the road. Despite the reputation, these vans are riddled with engineering faults that tend to rear their ugly heads at the most inconvenient times. The ones on the road right now will probably be on the road for another 20 years at least, with owners reluctantly reaching deep into their pockets to keep them running.

The main issue with the Wasserboxer engine is that if you put non-proprietary coolant into it - it will corrode the engine studs. Proprietary VW coolant costs almost $200 for 5L in Australia, so as you can imagine - no one except for pedantic VW enthusiasts ever bothers. Once plain water or (worse) normal green coolant enters the tank, the corrosion process begins and cannot be stopped. Once this has happened, there's really no point in flushing the cooling system because it will just start leaking. If left unrepaired, eventually oil will mix with the coolant via the corroded holes where the studs used to be - it's like a blown head gasket, but much, much worse. Fixing this requires a replacement engine (which chances are has the same problem, and you'd have no way of knowing without spending 6 hours taking it apart) or a very messy engine rebuild. Either way, your mechanic bill will definitely be in excess of $5000.

Another big problem is the mild steel fuel tank. In Australia we have standard fuel additives that are not very compatible with untreated steel. E10 compounds this problem. This combined with our hot, humid coastal climate means that you have about a maximum of about 15 years use before corrosion starts becoming a major problem... this is inevitable. A new replacement fuel tank will set you back about $800, plus labour, new hoses, new fuel pump, new filters, etc - you're looking at about $2000 including labour.

The stock exhaust is made from similar material as the fuel tank, and will also corrode in an irritating fashion, causing toxic carbon monoxide to enter the cabin due to the design of the undercarriage. This can be welded in some circumstances, but eventually gets so bad that it just has to be replaced. Fixing this with parts available in Australia is again very costly.

Mine does run a little rich, but even with the oxygen regulator gone - fuel consumption is outrageous. I get upwards of about 20L per 100km. That's around 300km on a 60L tank of premium on a good day. Appalling.

Do not have any illusions about this being an easy going hippie van that doesn't need much maintenance. It's actually a moody, temperamental beast that will take all your money, and occasionally pay you back with a memorable camping trip or a convenient furniture delivery.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 21st July, 2010

21st Apr 2011, 15:24

Hi there. Pretty fair review on the type, but as far as the fuel consumption issue goes, my 2.1 Syncro was using about the same 20L per 100 Km until I replaced the resistor caps on the ends of the spark plug leads, & the most important, the airflow meter was way up the whack. Once I got a newly rebuilt unit from the US, fuel burn dropped straight away to the recommended 14 L per 100km. Huge difference.

Give that a go. We love our van, but they are expensive to keep on the road, but that's the cost of enjoyment I reckon.

:)

25th Oct 2012, 13:57

To be honest, what you describe is pretty normal for a vehicle two decades old... and the air cooled engine isn't exactly maintenance free either.

My main concern with older VW commercials is their dreadful crash-worthiness... they fold up like a Coke can.