2007 Volvo S60 Reviews

2007 Volvo S60 SE 2.4 from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture2007
First year of ownership2011
Most recent year of ownership2013
Engine and transmission 2.4 Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 4 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.5 / 10
Distance when acquired50000 miles
Most recent distance97000 miles
Previous carToyota Corolla

Summary:

Good, but dear

Faults:

About 70k the air doser became faulty; it's basically a butterfly valve, the stop inside it was broke, so car was in limp mode. Did a DIY fix on it, but getting a computer to read the faults to find this was the problem; it was difficult, only the Volvo computer really is any use.

Rear shock burst at about 75k miles; made the car very, very skittish.

Rear brakes squealed, stripped and found the brake shoes on the left rear were binding on due to the handbrake arm being seized; needed new shoes.

Reluctor ring on CV joint broken at 90k.

Dual mass flywheel and clutch started juddering badly when taking up drive at about 80k. Replaced it at 90k miles, as I needed time to save for the repair; it was 900 quid for the parts, and it's a big job, really only for a professional mechanic, as you need a ramp etc.

General Comments:

I bought the car to tow a trailer. As my previous car was a petrol, I thought a diesel would be much better, but since then I have changed my mind; the price of the clutch and flywheel repair has put me off the car a bit.

It isn't as solid and robust as the older Volvos, it's sometimes quite hard to start, had the faults checked, none show up, possibly an injector fault, but they are a couple of hundred each, and I don't fancy changing them if that's not the problem LOL.

On the upside, the car is very, very comfortable, the engine has plenty of power, it's refined, the aircon has never been re-gassed and works perfect, and it has heated seats, which are very nice. There is little noise inside, it handles fairly well but it's not sporty, and it's fairly economical for a big car. I have got up to 55 MPG out of it, but that's not very realistic; on average I get somewhere between 40-47.

Parts for Volvos are quite expensive, even the aftermarket stuff, and it's not that easy to get in some cases, for example the engine oil is well over fifty quid.

Not a great deal of rear leg room really, I have been in smaller cars with more rear leg room, and to be honest the boot isn't fantastic, but part of that is because it's a saloon.

It doesn't seem to hold its value as well as for example a Toyota or VW, even though Volvo is reputed to be a reliable solid vehicle.

In summary, it's nice to drive, pretty pleasing to live with, but be prepared to pay plenty when it needs work.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 21st October, 2013

2007 Volvo S60 2.5 turbo from North America

Year of manufacture2007
First year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 2.5 turbo Automatic
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.5 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance51500 kilometres
Previous carToyota Camry

Summary:

The car to be proud of owning

Faults:

Anything going wrong? I don't know what you are talking about!

General Comments:

Who has built a better sedan yet? I enjoy every single minute of driving this car. Reliable, comfortable and powerful. Well, my wife says it's somehow old fashioned, but who cares? I want to enjoy my drive, not to show my car's curves to people!

Coming from an "all-plastic" Camry, I am just realizing how a car should be built. The Camry did not have any mechanical issue, but comparing these two is just impossible. I will not trade my (almost) 2 year old S60 with three 2009 Camry :)

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 20th October, 2008

Average review marks: 7.5 / 10, based on 2 reviews