Suzuki Baleno Reviews from Australia and New Zealand

2000 Suzuki Baleno GLX 1.3

Model year2000
Year of manufacture2000
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 1.3 Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.8 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance60000 kilometres
Previous carSuzuki Sierra

Summary:

Cheap to run, easy to drive, all electronic

Faults:

The only problem we have had was one electronic problem with the fuel management system which was fixed under warranty.

There have been no other electrical problems, despite having electronic everything.

General Comments:

We have had a 2000 Australian spec Baleno wagon since new, and it's living in the worst of tropical conditions: Darwin, Australia. It has got 60,000 km on it as of December 2005.

It is great to drive, very manoeuvrable, and easy to park, even as a wagon. It will sit on 140 km/hr on our open-roads, and copes well with an after-market cruise-control.

The air con keeps up with tropics, but it is either on or off; no climate control.

One minor complaint would be the quality of the trims. The exterior door handle surrounds and some of interior centre-pin type fasteners are not up to it.

Overall, I would recommend it. It was probably a bit over-priced as new, and Suzuki didn’t market it in Oz, so there aren’t too many around.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 19th December, 2005

10th Jan 2008, 17:55

I own a 2000 model Suzuki Baleno hatch & have problems for the last 12 months with the engine shuddering once the car is warm, engine dying at intersections & the check engine light coming on.

I have had the car to 3 different mechanics (one of whom was a Suzuki dealer) and have spoken to numerous others, & after changing the crank angle sensor, fuel filter, spark plugs & spark plug leads, still no solution.

I was extremely happy with the car until this problem started, and given that the mechanics can't seem to figure it out, I definitely won't buy a Suzuki again.

7th Feb 2011, 15:17

Ditto to the above entry. We are having exactly the same problem and no one can fix it.

Yellowlyn February 8 2011.

8th Nov 2011, 17:51

It could be the CMP (Cam Shaft Position) sensor, rather than the crank shaft sensor. This was what was wrong with my 2001 Suzuki Baleno. We ordered a CMP sensor, fitted it ourselves (my boyfriend's dad with car knowledge helped us), and it fixed the problem, no more stalling!

2000 Suzuki Baleno GLX 1.6 Litre

Year of manufacture2000
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 1.6 Litre Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 0 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance40000 kilometres
Previous carHolden Commodore

Summary:

One of the great forgotten cars on our roads

Faults:

Nothing has gone wrong with the car... it runs as smoothly as the day we got it...

General Comments:

The Suzuki Baleno is a great car and I would definitely recommend it to anyone in the market for a used car.

The car is reliable with relatively cheap service costs and running costs.

The car has all the trimmings including power windows, power mirrors, air con, remote central locking, alloy wheels, power steering, CD player and the list goes on.

The car has a very nippy engine and is perfect for highway cruising.

The cars steering is responsive and is a great drive on mountain roads.

The cars interior is not to everyones liking, in the fact that it is a tad too small for tall people and the Grey plastics are not as good as newer models, but that is to be expected with a 2000 model car.

The car is super reliable and we have never had any troubles with the car...

I would tthoroughly recommend it to anyone.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 14th September, 2004

31st May 2009, 04:53

It is true - the SUZUKI BALENO is an excellent car.

2nd May 2013, 01:16

I have just got a Suzuki Baleno as my first car. It is a perfect little car with tons of room.

1998 Suzuki Baleno GLX 1.6 SOHC

Year of manufacture1998
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 1.6 SOHC Manual
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 1 / 10
Comfort marks 3 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
3.0 / 10
Distance when acquired95000 kilometres
Most recent distance125000 kilometres
Previous carMitsubishi Diamante

Summary:

You get what you pay for

Faults:

Belts (excluding cambelt) done at 110,000.

Clutch at 120,000

Gearbox at 121,000.

Drivers seat is cheap and moves around. Rear boot carpet is held down by velcro.

Suzuki went overboard on the window seals, meaning the windows crawl up and down due to high friction.

General Comments:

This was a great car when first purchased. It was modern and had a full set of features for the price. The dealer replaced the cambelt and other belts before the purchase making me think I was set for trouble free motoring. Oh how wrong I was.

I have always owned Mitsi's and Toyota's and didn't think a car could ever be this bad. While it was good on GAS this seemed to be its only benefit as I witnessed the sudden implosion of the vehicle.

To have a Clutch and Gearbox go in a matter of km's within each other left my wallet hurting. Suzuki parts are also VERY expensive NZ. Which if I had known at the time would not have bothered buying this vehicle.

The belts which were replaced by the dealer had to be replaced 15,000km's later because of noise.

My outlook on brands such as Suzuki is they are only good for 100,000 km's suiting fleet vehicles. Do not buy one of these vehicles if it is anywhere near 100,000 km's.

Though manufacturers such as Toyota and Nissan are more expensive, there is a reason for this - you can't go wrong.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 29th July, 2004

Average review marks: 6.4 / 10, based on 8 reviews