Lada 2105 Reviews from Greece

1984 Lada 2105 1200s 2.1 litre

Year of manufacture1984
First year of ownership1997
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 2.1 litre Manual
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 3 / 10
Dealer Service marks 4 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
4.2 / 10
Distance when acquired9200 kilometres
Most recent distance10000 kilometres

Summary:

Below average, but cheap

Faults:

Water pump.

Brake cylinder and servo.

New radiator.

Heater valve.

Rear brake cylinders.

Transmission base.

Speedometer cable.

Left door lock.

Right side windows fell.

Rust all over the car.

Carburettor needed cleaning and overhaul.

Replaced tank because it was full of rust.

Overheating problems when driven fast and in traffic jams.

General Comments:

It reminds me more of a pickup truck than a saloon car; the handling isn't very good, the steering is heavy and slow, the brakes aren't very strong, the acceleration is poor, noisy, and the fuel economy is low.

On the other hand, it's quite roomy and the boot is big enough, the parts are cheap, and it is fairly reliable if you take care of it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 27th April, 2008

1989 Lada 2105 1200 1.2L petrol

Year of manufacture1989
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.2L petrol Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.2 / 10
Distance when acquired106000 kilometres
Most recent distance112000 kilometres
Previous carAlfa Romeo Alfetta GTV

Summary:

Low-budget motoring with lots of character!

Faults:

The distributor was replaced at 110.000km due to a faulty condenser.

Brake master cylinder was replaced at 112.000km.

The front suspension bushes were replaced at 106.000km with cheap imitation parts. They had to be replaced again at 112.000km, so this time genuine Lada bushes were installed.

The engine burns a lot of oil, so it probably needs to be rebuilt with new piston rings...

General Comments:

The interior is spacious, and the build quality is average. My '89 model has better seats and soundproofing than earlier models, so it's more comfortable.

The handling is perfect if you are familiar with rear-wheel-drive, but the brakes are barely adequate for fast driving.

The engine is torquey, but 62HP are not enough for the 1000kg+ car. The gearbox may have close ratios, but the car is rather slow.

The car is very robust and reliable.

All the repairs needed were either due to normal wear or due to my aggressive driving style.

The repairs cost is very cheap, cheaper than any other car I've ever owned. The petrol consumption ranges from 8-12l/100km, depending on your driving style...

In general, it is a very honest car, very cheap to run, reliable, with good handling and decent comfort...

It's not a modern car (the original design goes back to 1964), of course, but it's perfect if you seek a low-budget means of transport with lots of character.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 21st October, 2003

11th Dec 2003, 06:22

After taking my car to the local Lada dealer, I replaced the valve stem seals and the car has stopped consuming oil!!!

They told me that Lada engines start consuming oil after 200.000km and are generally bulletproof!!! Amazing, for such a cheap car!

Therefore, I'm even happier with my car now :-)

1986 Lada 2105 S ( S) 1.2 petrol (gasoline)

Year of manufacture1986
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.2 petrol (gasoline) Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 4 / 10
Dealer Service marks 4 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.0 / 10
Distance when acquired110000 kilometres
Most recent distance145000 kilometres

Faults:

The starter motor failed in the summer of 2002. After a visit to a specialist, I was told that it seemed the starter motor had never been serviced before, so that was no serious failure for a car of such mileage.

The car's lights had developed a "flashing" habit. A specialist advised me to replace the fuse box the car originally came with with the one the most up to date cars are being equipped directly from the factory. I followed his advice and the problem vanished.

The 1.2 liter engine of the car tends to malfunction and even goes off sometimes in traffic, because of the high temperatures reached in the engine bay. Sometimes you can observe the coolant temperature gauge move to the right, quite close to the red area. I have been advised that istalling an electrically operated fan will keep the temperature in the engine bay lower, and this problem will not be so intense. As I figured this problem is caused because the density of air in high temperatures is significantly low, so the air available for intake contains less oxygen than the quantity the engine requires, so this, combined of course with the high temperature the engine operates under heavy traffic makes the problem much worse. So in order to deal with traffic the car needs to be fitted with a cold air intake of some kind.

The windscreen wipers tend to malfunction or even completely fail to operate from time to time, and I have not figured or heard of a solution till today.

The cloth upholstery on the rear seat's back had deteriorated due to sunlight expos ion for so many years, and finally was torn recently. The seats also need re stuffing with fresh sponge-like material.

The car's dash has also some cracks caused again by sunlight expos ion, but all these are minor problems regarding the car's age!

The car suffered a braking system failure due to some mechanic's wrong ideas about rebuilding the rear brakes six to ten months ago, but fortunately there was some brake fluid left to stop the car when I discovered it.

General Comments:

This car was originally owned by my parents, from the date of purchase in 1986, till the spring of 2002, when they gave it to me. The car had regular maintenance, according to the instructions given by the factory. As a result it has been generally reliable and quite safe, even in comparison with any modern small family car.

The car's suspension is its strongest point, as far as my opinion is concerned, since it is very forgiving for a rear wheel drive car that carries the technology they used in cars some twenty years ago, while it is still surely fun to drive when you drive it enthusiastically.

Its engine is also quite strong for its age, and compared to other cars of its age and class, such as the Golf 1.4, can keep the car moving relatively fast.

All those mentioned above make it such a good car, but noone could overlook comfort matters when thinking of this car. Its seats are the most uncomfortable ones I have ever heard of and surely make it clear to all the passengers that their journey is going to have many stops for a rest. Maybe when the car was new they were less uncomfortable in comparison to the ones fitted in other cars of its class.

In my opinion the lack of a revolutions counter as a standard was not a crime back in 1986, but certainly including one as part of the standard equipment would not make this car so much more expensive to buy!

I believe most people underestimate this car for no obvious reason. It just treats its driver the same way he treats the car. Respect it and it will pay you back in its own, unique way. Neglect it, and it will soon become a car to dread! But this won't happen any sooner than a Mercedes or a Volvo of this age would start letting down its driver, and that's for sure.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 13th August, 2003

25th Aug 2003, 07:51

I would like to add some small points about the Lada 2105.

First of all, we should not put the Lada 2105 in comparison with the Golf 1.4, because as all of us know, German technology is extremely higher than the Russian technology, and also the manufacturing of a car is mainly dependent on the average income of a citizen, and the application that the car will be used for.

So we can say that the Lada 2105 is suitable for those people who work in jobs with hard conditions and ugly roads, and people who use cars as a method of transportation, and are not looking for high comfort and stuff like that. This type of people is spread in poor countries.

1982 Lada 2105 1.2 super gasoline

Year of manufacture1982
First year of ownership1987
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.2 super gasoline Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired60000 kilometres
Most recent distance380000 kilometres

Summary:

It;s a tool for work, not a car for a ride

Faults:

The first thing that has gone wrong was the fuel pump, which failed at 120,000 due too bad quality fuel, common to the Greek market.

The second thing that caused extra cost was the exhaust that got a bit rusty, but has never been a problem since it got repaired.

General Comments:

This car is not for comfort or for performance, it's a tool for the one who wants to drive every were, anytime, at low cost. After all the worst damage cost $300,the value of the whole car.

I would describe it as an all terrain tool rather than a car.

I am totaly satisfied from the work it has done for me as a tool, and it has worked really hard. If there was an organization for car rights I would have been arrested.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 15th January, 2003

21st Jun 2006, 15:24

My Lada had the first change of suspension rubbers after 24 years, and the new rubbers only last 3 months! well, our roads are very, very bad, I had two change of rubbers until I was tired and made the rubbers from old tires, they are working fine!!!

Average review marks: 6.6 / 10, based on 4 reviews