2000 Buick LeSabre Reviews from North America

2000 Buick LeSabre Limited 3.8

Model year2000
Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2013
Engine and transmission 3.8 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 1 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 1 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
4.5 / 10
Distance when acquired40000 miles
Most recent distance110000 miles

Summary:

If it can break, it will on this car

Faults:

Intake manifold.

7 window regulators.

HVAC dashboard actuator.

Heater core.

Trunk release.

Power steering pump.

Alternator.

Coils for distributor-less ignition.

Factory radio no longer plays CDs.

Factory radio not usable when rear defrost on.

Radiator.

Intake manifold cooling connections.

Transmission.

Ball joints.

CV joints.

Tie rods.

Struts.

Leaking trunk.

Rear brake caliper.

Master brake cylinder.

Exhaust system.

Various engine sensors.

Auto wiper speed control forced wipers to always be on highest speed.

Auto-on headlight feature no longer worked.

Power mirrors failed.

Rear defrost failed.

Electronic climate control failed - replaced with junk yard sourced unit.

Oil leaks from engine in multiple locations.

A/C compressor failure.

Basically the whole car for anything mechanical that mattered.

General Comments:

Best advice, stay away from Buick.

We had the same car in 1989 with wonderful reliability.

This car was the opposite of that car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 17th July, 2013

19th Jul 2013, 18:44

Not all newer Buicks are unreliable, in fact I would venture to say most are not. The 2000 LeSabre was a brand new model, and it does seem to have a lot of issues; some of which GM corrected by the end of the model run.

My last 4 cars have been Buicks, and all have served me very well.

Also to be fair, when Buick introduced the '86 FWD LeSabre, reliability was fair at best. By 1989, Buick was winning awards at Flint for reliability and Buick was the most reliable American brand into the early 90s. It takes time in many cases to work out the bugs in new models. When you buy the first model run of a new design, you always take a risk of experiencing higher problem rates than with a proven design.

2000 Buick LeSabre Limited 3.8L V6

Model year2000
Year of manufacture2000
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 3.8L V6 Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 1 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 1 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
4.5 / 10
Distance when acquired48000 miles
Most recent distance89000 miles
Previous carGeo Tracker

Summary:

P O S

Faults:

Let's see.. here is the list:

Regulator on back window has now gone out twice.

Ignition coils have all been replaced, ignition module failure.

Fuel injector replaced once, then a new clean out had to be performed due to the rough running engine.

Coolant leaks.

Back oil seal leak.

Front brakes warped, back brakes warped.

General Comments:

Overall not impressed with this car at ALL. Biggest POS I have ever owned. Mostly due to GM not standing behind their products. Most issues are known, and GM refuses to take care of them. If this car was made by Toyota, all these issues would have been taken care of years ago.

Love the car when it works, but would NEVER recommend this thing to anyone.

Oh, and yes I know that this year was a new model design, but this car was made on well known platforms, and using an engine and transmission already in GM's line up for years. These issues going wrong should have never happened, regardless of the model redesign. Booo on GM. Making lousy cars with lousy parts so their dealerships can make money off the backs of the consumers. Never again.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 21st June, 2011

2000 Buick LeSabre Limited 3.8

Model year2000
Year of manufacture2000
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 3.8 Automatic
Distance when acquired40000 miles
Most recent distance159400 miles
Previous carChevrolet Lumina

Summary:

I love my car, very economical and comfortable

Faults:

My car shifts hard after warming up. I was told to change the sensors inside of the transmission cover. There are a few sensors that are not cheap. It costs over $500.00 for the garage to replace the sensors.

I have been driving for a while with this problem. I first used Sea-Foam in my transmission fluid, and it helped for a week, but need to change them now. It will eventually take its toll on my transmission if I don't change them soon.

I'm not an expert, just a typical house wife and mom that likes to work on her own car.

Ask your mechanic about this. I think it will help. Be Happy and Healthy.

General Comments:

Hard shifting after warming up.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th March, 2011

5th Jul 2012, 15:17

Good for you that you work on your own car. I am impressed.

5th Mar 2013, 22:11

Don't try changing sensors or anything else inside the transmission. I doubt that you're familiar with the inner workings of a modern automatic trans. Have someone who knows what they're doing replace the sensors, if you haven't already done so.

As far as an additive for trans fluid, put in Lucas trans oil additive; it's the best stuff out there to use.

Average review marks: 6.6 / 10, based on 78 reviews