1985 Pontiac Fiero SE 2.8
Handles like a Ferrari, and is fun as heck to drive!
No problems yet. The stock stereo wasn't working upon purchase. But when I installed a nice Kenwood CD deck, I realized that the connections had just come apart. So it actually worked fine, and I've saved it for the lucky individual that eventually buys it from me.
I've owned my 1985 Fiero SE for a month so far, and I am TOTALLY impressed with this rig! It sounds super tough at an idle, and when punching it.
It has a TON of torque, and the ridiculously light body enables it to jump like a rocket. The 4 speed has very long gears, and will do 75 mph in 2nd without getting near the 5500 RPM redline.
The stock headrest speakers sound excellent, and you don't need to turn it up loud at all, because being that they are mounted in the headrests and are right in your face, it sounds loud at even modest volume.
Mine with a 2.8 V6, is getting 25.7 MPG, even with my foot in it hard!
These cars deserve to have nice wheels with low profile tires. The low pro's make it corner and generally handle like it's on rails, or on velcro! It corners scary fast and with precision.
This car gets stares constantly, and is a blast to drive.
I've bought a second one, same year, in meticulously PERFECT condition with only 42,040 miles on it, and it looks identical to my 1st one; I bought it because it's flawless and without a single blemish; a true 100 point car! I'm not even driving the new one. It is only going to be worth a ton 10 or 15 years down the road.
But I'm going to enjoy the heck out of driving my 1st one with 69.5k miles on it. It is an awesomely fast and fun car, equally fun as my 1989 MR2, but with more stomp (torque).
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 16th August, 2012
16th Aug 2012, 16:15
Really hard to accept Ferrari comparisons with something that has all of 140 hp and a Chevette-based front suspension.
16th Aug 2012, 17:58
If any Fiero's ever have good value as a true collector's car, it will be the 1988 six cylinder models, when Pontiac finally got everything (including the front suspension right). The earlier models had far too primitive a front suspension, and just did not handle as a sports car should. Not surprising, because early on the Fiero was planned to be a "commuter car", not a true sports car. However Pontiac decided to give it a decent sporty car treatment, and actually got it right in 1988, just before they killed off this fun little runabout.
I sold Pontiacs in that era, and believe me, the 88's were the best of the bunch. They weren't perfect, but they finally displayed handling worthy of their good looks.
I always liked those speakers in the headrests, as well.
Engine accessibility was another story, and do watch out for those "space frames" underneath the plastic bodies, as they do rust out.
17th Aug 2012, 09:54
Well, like a modern Ferrari, these did have a thing for catching on fire.
17th Aug 2012, 14:24
Have you ever driven a Ferrari? I was only 21 when I was allowed to have a go in the 348tb, which left a massive impression on me, and I also had the owner with me by the way :P.
But I can't imagine a Pontiac that was pretty much thrown together being similar in character to the bespoke Ferrari. I may be wrong, but I'm confused.
18th Aug 2012, 12:13
Thank you, I was trying to be diplomatic by calling the front suspension "primitive", but you are right on - the early models had Chevette front suspensions.
This is a case of making a silk purse out of a sow's ear - or more accurately, making a Ferrari out of a Fiero.