2004 Suzuki Aerio Reviews from North America

2004 Suzuki Aerio S 2.3

Model year2004
Year of manufacture2004
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2013
Engine and transmission 2.3 Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 4 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired50 miles
Most recent distance125000 miles
Previous carMazda Protege

Summary:

I had low expectations

Faults:

- O2 sensor.

- Rear wheel alignment.

- CD player.

General Comments:

Cheap and tough. I bought this car as a left over as the '05's were being rolled out. Bargained hard, as I had not a penny extra to spend on a reliable car for my wife. Bought the absolute stripped S model 2WD.

Initial impressions: pretty nice radio, strong engine, tidy handling (but no sports-car), interior noise a bit high, funky digital dash, very tall, which seats you very upright, lots of glass and a very useable back seat - like for adults, OK for long trips except for the noise.

Around town 24-26 MPG. Highway only a little better - maybe 30. Driven like a school marm - 34.

Aside from being a bit thirsty - it is cheap to operate. Nice things - chain to drive the cams (no belt replacement at 60K), hydraulic valves (not tappets to adjust), stainless steel exhaust.

At about 40K the check engine light came on. Needed an O2 sensor.

The original tires were made of recycled water bottles. The rears lasted 'til 30K - the fronts only a little longer. Wore out a second pair of rears in short order and went back to the dealer, who took NO responsibility for the factory not setting the rear alignment properly. That made me angry. A local tire shop told me the rear alignment COULD NOT be set properly with the adjustments available??? The tire shop did finally fix the problem by modifying the rear suspension!!! Tire wear is now normal.

At 120,000 miles I have NOT had to do a brake job, have not had to replace the clutch, have not had to replace the exhaust, have not had to replace a half shaft. Just air and oil filters, regular oil changes, tires.

More interesting is that it has its share of minor scratches and bumps... and the rust cancer just doesn't seem to get a start on this car... I hate rust.

Suzuki is gone from the US market and it's a shame. This stinky little cheapo car compares well with my Mazda Protege I drove to 192,000 miles.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 1st September, 2013

5th Sep 2013, 16:43

One reason Suzuki got phased out of the US is that auto insurers stopped insuring them. I'm not sure if that was because they didn't believe in the safety or something of them, but I know for sure a handful of companies excluded Suzuki vehicles.

Would a bit of rust really be worse than having to replace an expensive O2 sensor or do a rear wheel alignment? Did you jump a curve or something to throw off the alignment?

Most people still think of Suzuki for making motorcycles and boat engines, I think, rather than cars.

12th Nov 2013, 12:39

Yes, rust would have been worse than a $300 02 sensor.

Jumping curbs would result in a bent rim. No - rear alignment is a known issue with this car.

As to the insurance issue... you have to SELL a few cars before the insurance industry can "decide" not to insure it. Progressive was only to happy to take my money.

Specifically which insurance companies refused to insure a Suzuki?

2004 Suzuki Aerio LX 2.6

Model year2004
Year of manufacture2004
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2009
Engine and transmission 2.6 Automatic
Distance when acquired56000 miles
Most recent distance88000 miles
Previous carHonda Accord

Summary:

The perfect nightmare!

Faults:

Had to get a front and back-end alignment right after I bought the car. Then had to replace the rotors, brakes and axle boots 6 months after buying the car.

All power windows screeched when rolling up and down, until all of them quit working.

Driver and passenger seat belts locked up almost every time I turned a curve. (Dealership said it was a defect on most of the Aerios).

Constantly had to put the car in the shop for repairs.

Then the transmission started to slip at 87,000.

I sunk all my money into this car, then ended up having to trade it in on a Honda Element after I finally paid the loan off.

General Comments:

If I had bought a different Aerio, I probably wouldn't have had as many issues. It WAS a lemon, and I feel sorry for the person that got it after me.

Handles good (overlooking the rocks and bumps while driving), very small back seat, dashboard lights were frequently replaced.

Overall a terrible car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 8th June, 2010

Average review marks: 8.1 / 10, based on 5 reviews