2002 Toyota ECHO Reviews from North America

2002 Toyota ECHO 1.5 Liter

Model year2002
Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2012
Engine and transmission 1.5 Liter Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.8 / 10
Distance when acquired150000 miles
Most recent distance170000 miles
Previous carToyota Paseo

Summary:

Small, cheap car, huge interior, nothing to break, and up to 45 MPG

Faults:

Trim panel on passenger side "B" pillar comes loose sometimes, and just needs a quick whack to snap it back on.

A/C belt squeals on occasion, so I just need to get off my lazy butt and replace all of them.

General Comments:

I purchased this car several years back to have something newer that I could rely on, due to my other cars all being somewhat older models that run the risk of breakdowns. My criteria was that it needed a manual transmission, A/C, power steering and power brakes. I initially thought Echos were hideous, but after stumbling across this one, the price and the condition of the car quickly made it look very attractive.

It has been nothing but an outstanding vehicle. The center gauge cluster is kinda odd at first, but you quickly get used to it, and it won't phase you after less than 10 minutes. The transmission shifts with ease, and the engine, although slightly buzzy, is very quiet compared to other 4-bangers of this size. It's difficult to hear the thing idling. With the 5-speed, the car actually has some pretty decent pickup, and can do 80 MPH all day with no issue. I've driven it to California twice, in which it does the mountain grades quite well. It is somewhat susceptible to heavy cross winds, as it has a broad side profile and is a light car.

It is unbelievable how many storage bins and pockets they have crammed into such a small vehicle. There are two large ones on either side of the radio, one big long one under the steering wheel in front of the driver (great for things you need to grab quick), two glove boxes, a pocket above the climate control switches (unless you have the clock, which fills that gap) and a slide out tray cleverly stored underneath the passengers seat.

The funny looks of the car can be attributed to the interior, where it looks like they took a long car and squished it front to back, because it has a very tall roof line and the headroom is awesome. I'm 6'4" and sit in this very comfortably.

The factory CD player would not play CD's that I burned myself, but I put my own stereo in it shortly thereafter anyways, so this was a moot argument.

The interior does give off that plastic construction feel, but the fit and finish are of good quality, and it seems more on the edge of "money saving construction", and not flat out "cheap" like a lot of cars in this segment suffer from.

By far the best quality of the car is the fuel economy. I was shocked to find on my first tank of gas, I averaged 41 miles to the gallon in town, which it repeats quite regularly. The lowest I've ever seen it average was 36, and I actually have gotten it as high as 45 on road trips, which is almost Prius standards, and much better than the newer Yaris's for some reason or another...

As far as reliability, this car is bulletproof. In the almost 3 years I've had it, with 170K miles, with regular oil changes, it has not had ONE hiccup. And even if it did, repairs would be very easy to carry out, as the car is very simple by design. There is no timing belt (it has a chain), so you have already eliminated the weak link in the older econo Toyotas.

Buy yourself one, throw a large stereo in it, stop buying gas, then cruise the world, because this car will definitely take you there and back.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 9th May, 2012

10th May 2012, 16:54

I'm curious - Just what is the difference between '"money saving construction", and not flat out "cheap" like a lot of cars in this segment suffer from.'?

13th May 2012, 15:39

Echos are such underrated cars. Yeah, they look kind of goofy, but they can really rack up the kilometres. I bought mine used five years ago, and have not had any issues either. Solid. Fuel efficient, too.

2002 Toyota ECHO 1.5 Liter VVT-I

Model year2002
Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 1.5 Liter VVT-I Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.4 / 10
Distance when acquired37000 miles
Most recent distance113000 miles
Previous carToyota Celsior

Summary:

A truly wonderful car!

Faults:

Rear barring and axle assembly replaced under warranty.

A/C compressor.

General Comments:

I would recommend this wonderful car to anybody seeking a fuel efficient reliable car. There is no comparison to the Echo... I test drove many other cars and wanted a boring Civic until I came upon this.

I didn't buy it new, it was fresh off of lease and was basically in new shape. From what I understand mine is rare because it has all the options like power windows/locks/alarm/premium sound, which really make it a nice car, but if it didn't have those I would still love it.

Toyota really makes a good car. My last Toyota had 284k miles and still running when I bought this one. These cars aren't fast, but mine usually gets 40+ mpg. I get a lot of oohs and ahhs when friends ask about the gas mileage. I actually bought mine because my friend has one also and is very satisfied.

I plan to drive this car a few more years and buy a brand new truck, but still keep this to save gas! This car has never cost me more than $50 to fill up, even with the worst of gas prices!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 2nd September, 2008

Average review marks: 8.6 / 10, based on 10 reviews