2002 Toyota ECHO Sedan 1.5 from North America




Mirror fell off.

Bearings replaced.

Wouldn't start in the cold.

General Comments:

Bought this car from an old lady (only owner) in 2009, and kept it for around 3 years.


Design-wise is pretty terrible, especially the saloon version. Go for the hatchback instead which looks much better. Some parts, like the mirrors, are really bad quality. I remember one day, I folded one of the mirrors and it just fell off. The body had very little rust.


The worst interior ever. I once drove a Toyota Tercel (1997) and it had decent plastics inside. This ECHO is a different story; everywhere you look and touch is hard plastic that rattles and squeaks. The seats are extremely uncomfortable, so do not do long trips with this car.


Underpowered but gives good fuel consumption.




In this department the Echo scores lots of points. Lots of storage room and has a decent trunk.


Pretty bad considering its reputation. One day it would take 4-5 tries to start it in the cold. However, when it was getting a bit warmer the car would start no problem.

Also, beware of the automatic transmission. My sister had a 2000 ECHO and after 2 years of use the automatic wasn't shifting gears properly anymore. Cost to replace: around 2500$.


The ECHO gives good mileage, is really uncomfortable and I don't know why would anyone consider it over a Golf, Civic or Corolla.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 20th September, 2018

22nd Sep 2018, 22:39

"Fun: none."

This guy deserves a medal. Very profound. Great review!

24th Sep 2018, 01:05

One of the rare negative reviews for a 1st gen Echo. It seems the negative was mostly caused by subjective aesthetic reasons and by the non start condition which is uncommon on this car and can happen on any brand - just fix the issue.

But are you serious about the 0 comfort and performance marks? The front seats of this car are the simplest design out there, yet they are shockingly relaxing for day long rides.

And performance? The engine with the automatic transmission is really zippy on this car. Are you going to blame a Mazda 3 because it's not a 5.0 Ford Mustang?

As for the interior plastics, I fully agree: besides being downright ugly, the terrible plastic quality made the dashboard a cooking grill on hot sunny days. I could literally crack and fry an egg on the dashboard.

24th Sep 2018, 20:18

What does the "plastic quality" have to do with how hot the dashboard gets? A better quality plastic would stay cooler? Not likely.

28th Sep 2018, 13:32

A medal? Anyone who buys a Toyota ECHO is not looking for, let alone expecting, "fun". They seek a car that is cheap and gets good MPG, and (they think) because it is a Toyota, excellent reliability. Stating the obvious is hardly "profound".

4th Oct 2018, 23:31

Thank you sir. I really tried to go into details as much as I could without making it too dull.

Have a good day.

4th Oct 2018, 23:37

Hello. So I tried both the automatic and the manual (had it for roughly 3 years) as I already mentioned. The automatic is definitely slower than the manual. Did you ever try to take over on a highway with your car?

I did and I guess what I couldn't. Personally I find this to be rather unsafe.

As for the seats, I am in my 20s (no back problems) and I can tell you that this car gave me pain on long distance trips. I can't say the same about the Mazda, Corolla.

You have a good day.

7th Oct 2018, 12:44

Yes it's true. If you are ever going to try to take over a highway (or a country), don't use a Toyota ECHO.

2002 Toyota ECHO 1.5 Liter from North America


Small, cheap car, huge interior, nothing to break, and up to 45 MPG


Trim panel on passenger side "B" pillar comes loose sometimes, and just needs a quick whack to snap it back on.

A/C belt squeals on occasion, so I just need to get off my lazy butt and replace all of them.

General Comments:

I purchased this car several years back to have something newer that I could rely on, due to my other cars all being somewhat older models that run the risk of breakdowns. My criteria was that it needed a manual transmission, A/C, power steering and power brakes. I initially thought Echos were hideous, but after stumbling across this one, the price and the condition of the car quickly made it look very attractive.

It has been nothing but an outstanding vehicle. The center gauge cluster is kinda odd at first, but you quickly get used to it, and it won't phase you after less than 10 minutes. The transmission shifts with ease, and the engine, although slightly buzzy, is very quiet compared to other 4-bangers of this size. It's difficult to hear the thing idling. With the 5-speed, the car actually has some pretty decent pickup, and can do 80 MPH all day with no issue. I've driven it to California twice, in which it does the mountain grades quite well. It is somewhat susceptible to heavy cross winds, as it has a broad side profile and is a light car.

It is unbelievable how many storage bins and pockets they have crammed into such a small vehicle. There are two large ones on either side of the radio, one big long one under the steering wheel in front of the driver (great for things you need to grab quick), two glove boxes, a pocket above the climate control switches (unless you have the clock, which fills that gap) and a slide out tray cleverly stored underneath the passengers seat.

The funny looks of the car can be attributed to the interior, where it looks like they took a long car and squished it front to back, because it has a very tall roof line and the headroom is awesome. I'm 6'4" and sit in this very comfortably.

The factory CD player would not play CD's that I burned myself, but I put my own stereo in it shortly thereafter anyways, so this was a moot argument.

The interior does give off that plastic construction feel, but the fit and finish are of good quality, and it seems more on the edge of "money saving construction", and not flat out "cheap" like a lot of cars in this segment suffer from.

By far the best quality of the car is the fuel economy. I was shocked to find on my first tank of gas, I averaged 41 miles to the gallon in town, which it repeats quite regularly. The lowest I've ever seen it average was 36, and I actually have gotten it as high as 45 on road trips, which is almost Prius standards, and much better than the newer Yaris's for some reason or another...

As far as reliability, this car is bulletproof. In the almost 3 years I've had it, with 170K miles, with regular oil changes, it has not had ONE hiccup. And even if it did, repairs would be very easy to carry out, as the car is very simple by design. There is no timing belt (it has a chain), so you have already eliminated the weak link in the older econo Toyotas.

Buy yourself one, throw a large stereo in it, stop buying gas, then cruise the world, because this car will definitely take you there and back.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 9th May, 2012

10th May 2012, 16:54

I'm curious - Just what is the difference between '"money saving construction", and not flat out "cheap" like a lot of cars in this segment suffer from.'?

13th May 2012, 15:39

Echos are such underrated cars. Yeah, they look kind of goofy, but they can really rack up the kilometres. I bought mine used five years ago, and have not had any issues either. Solid. Fuel efficient, too.