Lada Samara Reviews from UK and Ireland

1997 Lada Samara 1.3S 4dr Saloon 1.3

Year of manufacture1997
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission 1.3 Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.2 / 10
Distance when acquired46000 miles
Most recent distance60000 miles
Previous carRover - Austin Metro

Summary:

A good solid, sensible car, huge value for money

Faults:

Nothing dire. First two faults were there when I bought the car, and were noted on the test drive.

Tail lights had gremlins from the day I bought the car resulting in the indicators going insane when the brakes were applied if you were indicating. This was tracked down to a dodgy connection at the slide-connectors on the clusters. No amount of cleaning solved this, so I soldered the lot together permanently. Problem solved.

Windscreen wipers refused to automatically park at the base of the windscreen when I got the car. Clean out and re-grease of the wiper motor unit solved the problem.

Carburettor float valve stuck closed one day resulting in the car dying at the side of the road (in the middle of nowhere, naturally). Getting it going again involved a highly technical method known as "give it a belt with a hammer" – never stuck again, but I did dismantle and clean the carburettor a week later just in case there was a reason for it having misbehaved. Worth noting that thanks to the emission control system, these cars (along with the 1.5E Rivas) have extremely complex carburettors, which require careful adjustment to avoid damage to the catalytic converter or other problems such as excessive fuel consumption.

The "Check engine" warning light (down by the heater controls, not on the main instrument panel) always had a tendency to blink occasionally at idle on my car. I never found the cause of this, as the emission control system always checked out when examined – in normal driving the light would never light, just at idle. I put it down to a "gremlin" and just got used to the fact that it did this after a few months and several dozen emission level checks.

Stick to the service schedule, and these cars won't give any trouble.

General Comments:

The Samara was the cheapest car available in the UK for a number of years…doesn't feel like it though.

The interior is quite comfortable, and well finished, even if the plastics aren't of the highest quality in the world, or the most exciting colour in the world. In the case of my car, everything seemed to be finished a uniform bluey-grey colour.

Legroom is adequate in the front and rear, and the car is quite comfortable on long journeys with up to four passengers (driver included), though five might be a bit of a squash. In addition to that, the luggage compartment is quite sizable for the size of car this is, though my car seemed to be very prone to soaking everything in there due to condensation on cold days. Overall comfort and accommodation are on par with a Ford Escort from the mid 80s, though with slightly more space I think.

My only real gripe with the interior is the lack of illumination on any of the controls aside from the heater – the rear window heater, rear foglight and hazard flasher buttons are impossible to tell apart in the dark aside from by memory. I added illumination to the switches in my car, but it’s something that really should be there from new. Yes, I know it's nit-picking. Especially from someone who had a Mk I Mini-Metro HLE as his previous car that had NO lighting on anything aside from the instruments!

The instruments in the Samara do deserve a mention simply due to being so comprehensive. Not only do you get your usual speedo, fuel and temperature gauges, but you also get a voltmeter and "econometer" which while not being particularly useful to the driver (except for when stuck in traffic jams and bored!), does serve to keep the back seat driver entertained for the duration of most trips. The main warning lights are also supplemented with a truly massive "STOP" warning lamp that comes on along with them – just in case you’re not paying attention. The voltmeter in my car had an annoying tendency to stick on cold mornings, requiring someone to thump the dashboard to bring it back to life – just a Lada gremlin though! The reset control for the tripometer is hidden away under the dashboard directly behind the indicator control though – which I actually had to resort to looking in the handbook to locate.

>>Comfortable enough, not a Mercedes, but what do you expect from a small family saloon?<<

On the road things are surprisingly pleasant. The steering is light and responsive (a far cry from the setup in the old Riva), the engine willing and able, and all the controls light.

My car actually turned out to be a very nimble beast, and a very nice drive, good fun to throw around on a backroad too. The ride is quite firm, with no real body roll apparent in normal driving, but not so firm as to be uncomfortable. A good balance.

For a 1.3 the engine pulls well, though it does get thrashy at the top end, along with a similarly boring absence of any real exhaust note, giving no real incentive for the driver to drive the car hard. Though it can perform if it's asked to, it's no flying machine, but you're not going to find yourself struggling at all to keep up with modern traffic either around town or on the motorway.

The gearchange is the only thing which lets the car down seriously in normal driving, with a very "rubbery" feel to it, making gears somewhat hard to find, especially in a hurry. A bit of a pain around town in particular, which is a shame, as the light steering and clutch would otherwise give the car full marks around town.

On the road, the only thing that's really worth mentioning, is that you shouldn't worry when the bonnet starts flapping around alarmingly at around 65mph...they all do that!

>>Not a racing car, but will happily cruise on the motorway all day<<

These are easy enough cars to work on, with truly excellent service and (cheap!) parts availability from http://www.lada.co.uk (Main national dealer's website), and good support from the owners clubs too.

My only gripe with the Samara was that it was really a bit boring, which was why I sold it on after a year (to make place for a Lada Niva 1.7i Hussar), not through any dislike for the car. Just felt rather ordinary.

Given the price they can be picked up for, so long as you don't buy a rot-box, you can't go wrong. Anything else is easy to sort if you know your way around a car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th December, 2006

31st Dec 2006, 06:03

Very good, informative review! Although I don't own a Lada, I have the next best thing... a Proton hehehe. I paid £700 on a P plate 3 years ago with 16,000 miles on it. Now at 45,000 and other than routine consumables like tyres, oil etc and a recored radiator it hasn't ever failed me. I have owned Fords, Renaults, Vauxhalls etc and none have come close to the reliability of my current car. I fail to see the point in paying large sums of money for a brand when something else will do the same job for less money and less trouble. Badge snobbery still rules I think. Heaven help people with Citroen C5's and even modern Fords in 5 years when they find the computers on their cars are obsolete and no one can fix em. For the sake of a computer chip the kingdom was lost! Or the car scrapped anyway. Good luck with your Lada.. another 10 years in it at least:-) Cheers.

1991 Lada Samara 1100L 1.1

Model year1991
Year of manufacture1991
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 1.1 Manual
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.5 / 10
Distance when acquired21000 miles
Most recent distance48000 miles
Previous carLada 1600ES

Summary:

A fantastic bargain

Faults:

Ignition module failed at 30000 (£40.00 to replace)

Petrol pump failed at 30000 (£25.00 to replace)

General Comments:

With the 1100 engine it's decidedly leisurely, but never returns less than 40 mpg and over 50 on a long run.

Oil consumption is nil.

She has never broken down on the road and always starts first time.

Having had a 1600ES for the previous six years, the Samara doesn't have the same personality, but makes up for the lack of charisma by having much lighter steering and being far more economical.

She cost £250 (including licence) and has been the second best car I have ever owned. (The best was the 1600ES)

These cars go on for ever. The engines are unburstable. They are a doddle to service and repair.

Who cares about image? There's better things to spend your money on!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th August, 2006

31st Aug 2006, 23:11

The fellow who bought it for a tenner, must be still laughing.

Average review marks: 6.7 / 10, based on 11 reviews