2000 Volkswagen Polo SE 1.4

Summary:

This car is a joke - avoid!

Faults:

Engine cuts out at lights.

Electric window failed.

Electric window switch short circuited.

Service light always flashing.

ABS intermitently flashes.

Temperature light flashes even when engine is cold.

Dash lights goes off.

Erratic idle.

General Comments:

Only wanted a car that would be reliable and cheap to run, so bought a VW. The reliability is a joke.

Car was an absolute nightmare, everything was going wrong.

Would never buy a VW again!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 30th March, 2007

5th Apr 2007, 04:06

I believe you must have been very unfortunate with the VW Polo you purchased. I have owned a 1.4 5dr SE 2000 plate for 3 years now and have found it to be a very reliable, economical and cheap car to run. This car is one of the best in it's class in my opinion.

10th Aug 2008, 03:58

W reg 1.4. 75bhp, wife's car purchased from new. This car is not without a few faults. Gearbox was never very smooth, engine is prone to cut out when air conditioning is on (any ideas?), clutch problems, also electrical niggles. At present I'm changing the cam belts, this is certainly not for the faint hearted. Owned a L reg 1.0 polo prior to this, a basic model purchased from new easy to work on, underpowered engine but 99.9% reliable.

MORAL: the basic models are the best with fewer gadgets to go wrong.

13th Aug 2010, 17:12

Hi there, I own a VW Polo 1.4 SE 2000 reg 16 valve, and although it has a few niggles, I wouldn't be without her.

The main problem we have is with the front tyres wearing very very quickly. We have to buy tyres approx twice a year! Apart from this, she is the most reliable car I've ever had, despite this little matter of the front tyres.

I would recommend everyone to get a Polo, as they're reliable and very cheap to run, and you get great miles. Hope this helps.

2000 Volkswagen Polo Classic 1.4

Summary:

Reliable

Faults:

The back window keeps fogging up regardless of the defroster.

The car in dark green!!!

General Comments:

The car is EXTREMLEY reliable. I can go 6 weeks on a full tank of petrol.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 19th January, 2007

2000 Volkswagen Polo Twist 1.4

Summary:

Nice while it lasted

Faults:

Engine cutting out in last year of ownership. Very scary when the power steering cut out. Probably a very simple common fault, but VW weren't very helpful.

General Comments:

Lovely luxury for a small car although engine was pretty pathetic for a Millenium car.

Nice Ladies car let down by pathetic VW not being very helpful.

Would have one again mind!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 5th July, 2006

2000 Volkswagen Polo GTi 1.6

Summary:

Stylish and Fast VW with a generous specification

Faults:

Rear washer pipe split, leaked water into car.

Rear brake binding, caused by faulty handbrake cable.

Alloy wheels corroding.

General Comments:

I previously had the same car, but the base model E and I had always wanted the GTi version so I saved up and got one.

The spec of the GTi beats anything in its class, especially at the time it came out (2000). Climate control with Xenon lights as standard and a 6CD changer plus alloys and dual airbags with optional heated and/or leather seats.

The interior of this car also beats anything in its class. Borrowed and slightly modified by the Lupo the dash is stylish/funky and innovative. Chrome surrounds on the dials and at night the blue illuminated instruments look very cool, you really get that feeling of superior build quality.

The exterior is very well done. The best thing about VW is that they style the GTi's in a subtle way. The BBS alloys with honeycomb grille and extended sills and bumper strips and rear roof spoiler with the whole thing lowered 10mm. The car is another VW that will look good in many years time because the styling is subtle and classy.

I found the performance of this car to be good. 125Bhp with 0-60 in 8.7 seconds and a top speed of 127mph. My only comment is that the car needs to be reveed way over 3500rpm before you feel a kick at which point the car seems to spring to life. I put that down to the VVT (variable valve timing) and the fact my particular car has still got problems with brakes.

The problems I have had with the car are shared by many other polo drivers, most of these problems are small and not too costly. But its not what you should get from a VW (maybe its cause they put them together in spain now?).

The main gripe about this car is the dealers. I have dealt with VW dealers a few years now and they are all bad. The problem is the reputation of VW is of reliability and build quality. However the reliability of current VW's is relatively low compared to its competitors. So when things go wrong is a pain trying to get anything done on warranty and the attidute you get from the staff is poor. Often booking cars in when parts aren't available and blatantly lying about design faults (corroding alloys).

I think the predecessor to this model (polo 9N year 2002 onwards) and the face-lift Polo 9N are seriously lacking the spec and look of this model polo. The interior just feels cheap and thinned out, on the facelift model they no longer have gas struts to hold up the bonnet. More money saving adjustments that remove that VW feeling of superior build quality and refinement. Not to mention the fact VW still commands higher prices than its competitors.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th November, 2005

27th Nov 2005, 11:09

What a pathetic slow car you have. Power to weight ratio is a joke on the heavy underpowered polo gti.

18th Dec 2005, 13:34

The car is heavy because it has so many extras as standard (air con etc).

It's still as fast, or faster than all of its direct competitors.

21st Dec 2005, 08:12

I wouldn't call it slow. I have timed mine at 8.9sec to 60mph.

So it's a lot quicker than a vtr.