1994 Cadillac Fleetwood Reviews - Page 2 of 2

1994 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham 5.7 LT1 from North America

Model year1994
Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 5.7 LT1 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.8 / 10
Distance when acquired122000 miles
Most recent distance126000 miles
Previous carMercury Grand Marquis

Summary:

Pretty, but not especially good..

Faults:

Battery 70.

A/c power module 130.

EGR valve 60.

Waterpump.

Heater hoses.

Interior lights won't go off.

Vibrates at speeds more than 70mph.

Steering wheel is off center.

Exhaust leak.

Trunk pull down.

Paint is thin.

Skin dents too easy.

Memory seats don't work.

Seat heat doesn't work.

Transmission bushing and seal.

A/c drain fell off soaking the interior.

General Comments:

Very pretty car, definitely the best looking car I've had. the engine runs smooth enough, but I find the auxiliaries to be noisy. the ride is not as quiet as one would hope since roadnoise echos in the cabin giving a low frequent rumble at low speeds. The car vibrates at high speeds. it doesn't handle very well it has lots of bodyroll and feels like an older car than it is. power is more than sufficient. interior and trunkspace is not as good as expected for a car that size.

The previous owner (original) had many major problems with leaks of all kinds. several bills show amounts of 2000-3000$

My recommendation is to buy a similar Grand Marquis which is a better car for less money.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 5th December, 2006

29th Jun 2007, 11:20

Grand Marquis is definitely less costly to buy, but it's definitely not as luxurious or nearly the status symbol these Fleetwoods are. I would argue it's not as reliable in 200k miles of driving compared to the Fleetwood.

4th May 2008, 15:05

Your fleetwood was 12 years old with over 120k miles when you got it. Those minor things that were wrong with it should be expected. A similar year and condition Grand Marquis would've had just as many and possibly more things wrong with it. Believe it or not a Fleetwood actually cost less to maintain than a Grand Marquis or similar Ford product i.e. Lincoln Town Car.

1994 Cadillac Fleetwood 5.7 from North America

Model year1994
Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 5.7 Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.3 / 10
Previous carCadillac Brougham

Summary:

The car is one of a kind

Faults:

Well a few things have gone wrong, but nothing that I shouldn't expect since it does have 192,000 miles.

My fuel pump just went up today (6/24/06), and the drivers side (CDC) converter is clogged up. But that's really it.

General Comments:

I have to say it's a very good car - well made. It has very good hp, handles very good, and it's so comfortable. It has all the power I need.

I love my car. Everywhere I go, people tell me how good the car looks. I had a lot of people want to buy it from me, but I can't seem to part with it. I'm going to keep it as long as I can, even if I have to put another engine in, I will.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 24th June, 2006

21st Sep 2009, 02:06

I have a 1993 Limited Edition triple black Fleetwood. I get almost 30 mpg on long interstate drives and 20 mpg around local trips consistently. I agree with your review.

1994 Cadillac Fleetwood LT1-350 from North America

Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission LT1-350 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired156000 miles
Most recent distance163450 miles
Previous carChevrolet Monte Carlo

Summary:

This car has a lot of potential and I will exploit it to the max

Faults:

I replaced the water pump at 157,000 miles.

General Comments:

This car acclerates surprisingly fast for a 4,000+ pound car.

The interior is very comfortable.

I now have 162,000 miles on it and it runs perfect.

The engine has never been rebuilt and I have no problems with the car whatsoever.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 6th February, 2004

1994 Cadillac Fleetwood Sedan 5.7 Litre V8 from North America

Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 5.7 Litre V8 Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.8 / 10
Distance when acquired86100 miles
Most recent distance89000 miles
Previous carCadillac DeVille

Summary:

The closest to perfect that you can get

Faults:

Nothing has gone wrong with the car.

It is a very well built, American luxury car.

General Comments:

This car has excellent speed and handling, and can go from 0 to 60 in about 7 seconds.

The interior is extremely comfortable, and has ample room for me (I am 6'3).

I really like the digital instruments and the electronic climate control.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 24th September, 2003

8th Jul 2004, 00:22

I have to somewhat agree with the above comment. These Fleetwoods are the same car mechanically as the Chevy Caprice and Buick Roadmaster, which is not neccessarily a bad thing considering the high reliability. Being a Caddy though, that's just sad. I find the '93-'96 Fleetwood to be a perfectly nice full-size, V8 powered, American luxury sedan. Compared to every other Cadillac of this age, the Fleetwood is just not a Caddy. The luxury aspect compared to the other models is a joke. It has the largest and LEAST powerful engine, with a 5.7L 260hp engine. However, of all Cadillacs, the Fleetwood would be my choice. It's the most economical model, cheapest and easiest to repair, and is still quite luxurious for a car, overall. It's worth living without the notoriously expensive to fix, gas guzzling "Northstar" engine. The 5.7L in the Fleetwood (although generic to GM) is a much better choice from a performance, reliability, and fuel economy standpoint. Think of the Fleedwood as Cadillacs entry luxury sedan.

Average review marks: 7.9 / 10, based on 7 reviews