1999 Chevrolet Lumina Reviews - Page 2 of 3

1999 Chevrolet Lumina from North America

Model year1999
Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 2 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.3 / 10
Distance when acquired32000 miles
Most recent distance80000 miles
Previous carFord Escort

Summary:

Don't buy one!

Faults:

Very comfy car for driving, nice and roomy, that's about all I can say nice about the car.

Intake manifold gasket went at 57,000 miles - expensive fix.

Many small repeat trips for maintenance - a very needy car!

General Comments:

Poor gas mileage about town - not bad on the highway.

I miss my Escort GT - put 4 times the miles on it with no major problems, like this car.

Will trade in very soon! I expected more from a family sedan.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 7th July, 2006

1999 Chevrolet Lumina Base 3.1L from North America

Model year1999
Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 3.1L Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired50500 miles
Most recent distance84000 miles
Previous carPlymouth Neon

Summary:

It's a quick, comfortable, and reliable car with few shortcomings

Faults:

Bought the car used, so there was a possibility for it to have some issues. However, I will omit obvious problems caused by user-errors:

- Piston slap & valvetrain racket is apparent when engine is under load, occurs when first started after it sits for at least one hour, not fixed.

- Condensation lined the driver's headlight, fixed myself (cleared water out with compressor and vacuum; sealed assembly with silicone)

- PassKey theft deterrent system malfunctions and disables cars randomly, not fixed.

- Factory CD player died, not fixed.

- Trunk will not close properly, not fixed.

- Weld on exhaust system broke, $20 repair.

General Comments:

The car has been reliable in general. When acquired, I had the fuel injectors cleaned as this can be a problem on 3.1L GMs. $100.

Spark plug & wires changed, included general tuneup, $100.

That is all for expenses.

The car runs well, never fails to start unless the PassKey II system malfunctions. The car is fairly agile, although there is some body roll and oversteer when you drive it hard. However, for most "normal" driving habits, this car is excellent. Fairly quick to accelerate with the 3.1, good with highway passing.

I cannot stand piston slap however, so I will never buy another GM product again. It was not just this car, it's the fact that since 1999, most of their engines through 2004 and maybe 2005 had it, and had it bad. When it takes a major corporation with sales as high as they have SIX years to fix a problem such as this, it completely turns me off to them. Visit www.pistonslap.com for more information on the issue.

Other than that, if you can see past irritating noises and the chance that your car may lose power (compression) over time, this is a great car to buy used. If you can get a 1995 or 1996 model, those were probably the greatest. 1997 and 1998 models didn't have great reliability, and after 1999 the infamous slap became very apparent.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 5th January, 2006

31st Oct 2007, 19:03

WOW, My Lumina has 110,000 on it and I do not get the noise that you were describing. Must be you need your timing adjusted or use a better grade of gas.

1999 Chevrolet Lumina Std. 3.1 from North America

Model year1999
Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 3.1 Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.0 / 10
Distance when acquired46000 miles
Previous carPlymouth Acclaim

Summary:

Buyer beware

Faults:

Manifold gasket failure within 2 weeks of buying car at only 47,000 miles on 3.1 engine.

General Comments:

GM knows full well that this is a chronic problem with these engines.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 28th October, 2004

5th Nov 2004, 11:35

There is no problem with the engine, it is all how you drive it. We have one with 136000 miles in it and we have had no problems, It is all original.

16th Oct 2006, 12:49

Bad Gasket! No donut!

Mine went out at 52000 miles, and cost 550 to fix.

16th May 2007, 20:55

Guys, I have a 99 Monte Carlo, which is practically no different than the lumina. I have the 3.1 L V6 automatic, and it has almost 167000 miles on it. The only problems it has had that I know of, was the alternator going bad, That's IT. NO major problems, and not every vehicle has the same problems, just because your car is a POS and blows a head gasket, or has issues like that happening, don't mean they will happen to other people. I know you might be warning them, but still, not every vehicle will have problems. My car was driven over 50000 miles in 9 months, still runs great. I love this car, and I know the lumina is not different.

3rd Jan 2010, 00:26

GM switched over to their fancy DexCool antifreeze that ate the stock gaskets. They could never afford a recall because the problem is in 30 different cars in all their brands (the 3.1 and 3.8 engines)...just imagine fixing 20 million cars at $500 a pop.

Average review marks: 6.4 / 10, based on 8 reviews