1992 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 5.7 from North America

Summary:

It's no wonder GM went bankrupt; they deserved it!

Faults:

The transmission failed at 187000 3 months after I bought it for 2 G's, and I had it rebuilt twice in the next 13 months by a transmission place (not a good idea). The first time it came with a 12,000 mile, 12 month warranty. I was a Fed Ex over the road driver at the time, and only drove it 565 miles in following 13 months to come.

Shortly after, the transmission went out again. Wouldn't go in reverse. Took it back to the same shop 5 blocks from home, only to find a whole new crew working there. New service manager says they should have replaced the reaction shell as well as the rear planetary gears, and offered to rebuild it a second time for free, even though I was one month past the warranty. The low miles I put on it during the warranty is what saved me, but with strings attached. There would be no warranty with the 2nd rebuild, and no paper work for the work done either. So I went along with it since it was a freebee.

The day after the 2nd rebuild, it wouldn't go out of first gear. Took it back and they fixed it again the next day for free again. It was a spring too tight that got stuck, and they put in a different one.

Two weeks later the speedo stopped working, but I had to hit the road and didn't have time to mess with taking it back a 4th time. And to this day the speedo works sometimes, but not always. Probably just a cable that's not right.

Other than that, it's been good enough mechanically. But the GM junk interior is awful. The door panel wants to fall off. Squeaks and rattles all over the place. Only one door lock works. 3 windows won't roll up all the way right. I have to help the driver's door window go up with my hand. My Tercel, a year older, was much better built and had far less rust.

The Suburban gets lousy fuel mileage and is gutless on the highway. But it got top honors on a website as being #1 of the top ten vehicles in the US least likely to get a speeding ticket. Being that I am a trucker, this is a good thing, but not a fun thing.

The steering radius and ABS brakes are outstanding.

The A/C still blows cold front and back, with no leaks, even though I bought it in Arizona. And yes the cargo space is great, but it's a lousy tow vehicle because it's so underpowered.

Would I buy it again if I could roll back the clock ? No I would not. But I am keeping it because of the rebuilt transmission. The later variations of the 700R were built better than the early 80's models were. These days I just use it for yard work, pulling a truck trailer made from a 3/4 ton 80's Ford pick up. It's 33" feet long from front to back with the trailer hooked, and the boxy aerodynamics make them look good together actually.

The steering has way too much slop in it.

The driver's seat is worn funny so that the left side is much lower than the right side.

The radio doesn't work.

Only one door lock will work with the key, and all the electric locks work from the passenger side door switch only.

The headliner looks like crap falling apart.

The coils around the shocks are skinny as tooth picks, and hardly do a thing.

The 1500 series was the soccer mom model with a 2 bolt main motor. If I had to buy another one, I'd get the 2500; better 4 bolt main motor and better suspension.

My first car back in the 70's was a 56 Nomad with a Vette mill that punched out 30 over and a Muncie M22, 68 Camaro buckets with two tone silver and graphite grey paint I bought for a grand. Compared to that, this thing is a flat out piece of crap overall, with the exception of the brakes turning radius and A/C. God I wish I never sold that car LOL. But I still have pics of it and the memories :) The only bad thing about the 55 thru 7 Nomads is the tail gates leaked. Google it if you want to find out why; I am out of here.

MFM

General Comments:

GM junk in gargantuan proportions when it comes to integrity. And you've got to have two sets of tools to work on it. The reason being is that every year they upgrade something, they do it in metric. But the stuff they don't change around is still standard from the old days. So you need both standard and metric size tools to work on one vehicle. Newer post millennium vehicles are not so bad with this.

11 to 13 MPG, yet there are still government websites that claim it gets 18 to 22.

Takes forever to warm up on a cold day, but on the flip side, it's never overheated either. It's too gutless to overheat, but it does its job so I can't hate it too bad. And sometimes I still like it. Just not as much as I wish I could like it.

It's like having a sickly pet. You love it for some reason, but kind of wish you never got it in the first place.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 3rd June, 2013

5th Jun 2013, 06:53

Another reviewer who buys an old, high mileage vehicle and then complains about having to make repairs to it. Who buys a Suburban expecting to get good MPG?

6th Jun 2013, 13:55

The Chevy/GMC Suburbans are recognized as some of the best and most reliable SUV's in the world. Members of my family have had several over the past 20 years. All were flawless.

7th Jun 2013, 15:20

1st review - the mileage really wasn't that high on this one. And why should gas mileage be cut in half just because it's not new? People apparently like this truck, because 3 other people were looking at it at the time that I bought it.

7th Jun 2013, 16:24

I am on my 5th Corvette over the years. I cannot praise the newest gen models enough. Bulletproof drive trains and a blast to own. The GM 2014 waiting list will seem a lifetime.

10th Jun 2013, 16:51

Just did the first repair on our 11 year old GM SUV with 117,000 miles on it. I replaced the water pump and drive belt at a cost of $77. The spark plugs are still the originals, as are the brake pads. The hoses and drive belt were like new. I only replaced the drive belt because I had to remove it anyway.

I bought new brake pads for all four wheels two years ago, but have not installed them because the original pads at 117,000 miles show less than 3/32" of wear.

This has been one of the best vehicles we have ever owned. $77 in repairs in 11 years figures out to less than $8 a year.

15th Jul 2013, 19:07

I'll sell you mine and you can brag about the 6 cracks in the dashboard while you're showing it off. I've owned 18 wheelers with half a million miles on them that didn't look like trash like the Suburban. GM went bankrupt for a reason!

16th Jul 2013, 10:02

The new ones are very nice. Bring your wallet and enjoy!

1992 Chevrolet Suburban Silverado 5.7 liter gasoline from North America

Summary:

The ne plus ultra of family transport

Faults:

Brake rebuild at 100,000 miles. Transmission rebuild at 100,000 miles. Replaced pulley at 102,000 miles. Front passenger seat belt latch just broke. Replaced one electric window motor a couple of years ago.

General Comments:

12 years old, and still trucking. I've since added a '99 Expedition to the family fleet, but it's a pale comparison to the '92 Suburban C1500. For the same gas mileage, I get a much roomier, more comfortable vehicle. The only advantage I give the Expedition is substantially better handling.

At 100,000 miles plus, I've had to spend a substantial amount of money on the truck -- about $1500 for a complete brake rebuild at all four wheels and a similar amount for a completely overhauled transmission and new torque converter. Now, the truck is good for another 100,000 miles or so, and I'm keeping it.

Last summer, I drove it on a 2,000 mile road trip, with seven people and a bay packed with luggage, without a single problem. It's an ideal highway vehicle; but handling's a bit too sluggish to make it really enjoyable in street driving.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 16th March, 2004

15th Jul 2013, 19:12

Sluggish is putting it mildly. Gutless is more like it! I pulled a 1000 pound boat and it could hardly do anything. The soccer mom suspension is a joke, and it was voted as the number one vehicle least likely to get a speeding ticket of the 10 on a website.

1992 Chevrolet Suburban 5.7L V8 from North America

Summary:

Cheaply made for the price

Faults:

There were just little mechanical things like windshield wiper box etc.

The radiator was replaced at just under 100,000km. The rad's were made cheap and too thin for this beast.

The seats are uncomfortable.

General Comments:

The 2wd isn't too bad in winter because of all of the weight behind it.

It rides as smooth as a Cadillac.

The ABS brakes have saved me many times.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 3rd January, 2003

15th Jul 2013, 19:15

Now the brakes have air in them, but they used to work good. The door panels are falling apart. Half the windows won't roll up all the way on their own. It still runs, but nothing to brag about.