Chevrolet Uplander Reviews

2006 Chevrolet Uplander LS 3.5L V6 from North America

Model year2006
Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 3.5L V6 Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.8 / 10
Distance when acquired97000 kilometres
Most recent distance141000 kilometres
Previous carFord Taurus

Summary:

Good, solid, but anonymous vehicle

Faults:

Transmission pressure manifold at 139K. My mechanic also replaced the two solenoid valves in the transmission while he had it open.

Evap system is currently on the fritz; replaced the gas cap, but it doesn't work.

General Comments:

It's a good solid car, and there is plenty of power with the V6.

I'm surprised cruise control wasn't standard on this model.

I like the automatic headlights, it's been a feature in GM cars for over 20 years, and I'm amazed many other manufacturers don't offer this as a standard feature.

My big beef is the lack of underfloor storage like in traditional station wagons.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 16th October, 2011

2007 Chevrolet Uplander LT 4.3L V6 from North America

Model year2007
Year of manufacture2007
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 4.3L V6 Automatic
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired58000 kilometres
Most recent distance79000 kilometres
Previous carFord Taurus

Summary:

Love and hate it

Faults:

My tranny keeps slipping, especially after taking off from stop lights or stop signs, and going up and down hill along highways. This is making me worry.

General Comments:

Seats are comfy, and I like the roominess for passengers and cargo.

This van is a pig on gas during short trips to the store, which is about 30 minutes away, however on long trips it did very well.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 4th June, 2011

12th Oct 2011, 12:27

I had my 07 Uplander LT for less than a year, and I have had to fix/replace the fuel pump twice, but I think that's the dealer screwing me and not fixing it right the first time.

A month later I had to replace a new ignition switch; again the dealer blamed me.

2009 Chevrolet Uplander LS 3.9 V6 from North America

Model year2009
Year of manufacture2009
First year of ownership2009
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 3.9 V6 Automatic
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.2 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance60000 kilometres

Summary:

It gets the job done - but only that

Faults:

It's still only a couple years old, so only a few things to report:

- Traction control, stability control and ABS constantly decide to stop working (sometimes momentarily, sometimes the warnings last for a few days).

- One rear brake caliper seized when parked.

- Power steering pump noise and malfunction at 40,000km.

- Fuel gauge is finicky.

- "Wood trim" is falling off.

General Comments:

I bought the car for $15000 CDN brand new (with remote start and tinted windows), entirely for the purpose of being my daily driver and hauling things around for building the house. I commute for work, so I tend to put a lot of mileage on my cars - this one was no different.

It's really no surprise that it's been discontinued. It's basically the same pushrod garbage that my old Chevy Venture was. It's mediocre in just about every sense; there is no one area wherein this is a good minivan.

The drivetrain is, well... mediocre. Same old 4 speed auto that GM has been using since the beginning of time. The 3.9V6 is actually pretty torquey and gets the job done, but it is by no means smooth or refined. The engine really needs a nice tall 5th gear for the freeway, and passing is always ugly because the transmission only has 4 gears to play with. Trans itself is hesitant and doesn't wake up until you beat it. Brakes have two settings: on or off. I didn't expect brake feel like my BMW, but it's just disappointing.

The interior of the LS is comfortable, but only for the 2 passengers up front (usually I had the rear seats taken out). However, the middle row seats are too narrow and don't have armrests, and the rear bench is very uncomfortable. The worst attempt at fake wood trim that I have ever seen. Plastics are cheap, rattles are plenty.

Stability control is intrusive. If you go over a speedbump at an awkward angle or even enter a sloped driveway, it cuts in and makes a lot of noise.

Mileage in the city is terrible (about 300 kms/tank) and road noise on the freeway is also pretty bad.

I bought this van to basically beat on, and it's done the job. Gets me where I need to go, and can't argue with the price. But if you want an actual minivan for a family with comfort and refinement, this is definitely not it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 26th March, 2011

Average review marks: 6.8 / 10, based on 13 reviews