1989 Chrysler New Yorker Reviews

1989 Chrysler New Yorker Landau V6 from North America

Model year1989
Year of manufacture1989
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission V6 Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 3 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 2 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.0 / 10
Distance when acquired100000 miles
Most recent distance180000 miles
Previous carDodge Dakota

Summary:

This car has some major flaws, but can be a good choice under modest driving conditions.

Faults:

First and foremost, this car burns oil. A lot of oil. This is due to deterioration in the valve stem seals. Replacing them is costly in labor, and one mechanic told me that the seals are inferior, lasting only a matter of months before deteriorating appreciably. This is consistent with our experience.

You can get around this by moving to 10W-30 instead of the recommended 5W-30, but give the car a little more warm-up time in winter if you go this route.

Secondly, we have had transmission problems too numerous to mention. Other posters have described transmission troubles; suffice it to say that all of them were familiar to me.

Because of the oil-burning problem as well as exhaust problems, we regularly add an anti-smoke product to avoid choking to death at stoplights. Three very good mechanics have been unable to fix this problem.

The handling on the car is poor. A hard (but not unreasonably hard) turn causes the engine to sputter and occasionally die. In my rural area, with lots of potholes, curvy highways, and dirt roads, it is quick to get out of alignment. You may not have these problems if roads are well-maintained in your area, but if you are rural, this is one to avoid.

The heating system has never worked properly in the entire life of the car (this car has been in my family since it was new). The heater blows cold air unless set at 85 degrees, at which point it blows very hot air. We have to cycle it on and off to be reasonably comfortable. More recently, the panel vents stopped working, although the floor and defrost functions still work (but only when set at 85).

Two doors no longer have exterior trim, as it fell off. It is practically impossible to reattach.

The interior details fall off easily. We have reattached the veneer on the doors several times. The headliner has been re-glued twice by professionals, but will not stay up.

Our power locking system still works, but the rear passenger door lock sticks badly, and the latch is also stubborn.

General Comments:

This car was a gift to my husband from his grandparents. They lived in the suburbs and took long highway trips every year, and liked this car very much. If you want a vehicle with a lot of pickup that will perform well on the highway or in the well-maintained suburbs, this is a fine car (except for the transmission and the valve stem seals).

It's also very comfortable (except for the heating problem). The seats are fabulous. When this car eventually dies, I may keep them as lounge chairs.

However, it is poorly suited to my family's needs in a snowy rural area, so I can't recommend it highly. Its handling is not suitable for narrow roads with sharp turns, and the car does not stand up well to snow, ice, or potholes. As an older luxury vehicle can be very expensive to repair, it's not a good car for young people with limited finances.

The gas mileage is reasonable for a car of this size. We are still getting 23 or more MPG, and it used to be much better. Between 55 and 60, it used to get as high as 29 MPG on the highway.

This car has the easiest-to-replace headlights I have ever seen. They practically snap off and on. Accessibility for battery- and oil-changing are similarly good; there's plenty of room under the hood to do whatever you need to do.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 7th January, 2006

7th Jan 2006, 19:27

I'm skeptical of the oil additive products like Motor Honey and Barr's Stop Leak, etc. The stuff looks like taffy when you pour it in. It may be a quick fix to stop it smoking long enough to sell it to the trusting, but it's not a real repair. It may stop the oil smoke, but something with that extreme viscosity seems to me like it may be plugging up oil galleries. At least if it's smoking a little, you know the oil is penetrating. Maybe it would be worth going to a higher viscosity oil, rather than the motor honey type additive. Maybe 10W-40. I don't know if the "Max-Life" oil really is better, the oil that says it's better for +75,000 mile vehicles because it conditions valve stem seals.

1989 Chrysler New Yorker Basic 3.0L V6 from North America

Model year1989
Year of manufacture1989
First year of ownership1990
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 3.0L V6 Automatic
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.4 / 10
Distance when acquired79882 miles
Most recent distance80989 miles
Previous carChrysler New Yorker

Summary:

Great car if it was still around

Faults:

Electricals went bad for the radio and the gauges ($150).

Air conditioning compressor went bad and cost me ($350) to replace.

Rear window motors went out for both sides.

Right rear door will not lock by itself or manually.

Motor in headlamp flaps went out.

Rear running tail lamps went out.

General Comments:

The car has 81000 miles on it. I just received it a few days ago. It was my Grandma's car, and has been only used to travel. It has been babied, and never drove over 65mph.

I just turned 16 a few days ago. I took it out for the first time, and got up on its strong running 3.0L V6 Mitsubishi engine, and I was surprised by its performance!

My Mom has a 2000 Mustang, it only has a 3.8L V6, but I have to say my New Yorker will smoke that car.

The New Yorker is a cruiser. If you want to race, the New Yorker is not for you. Don't get me wrong, it gets up good, it's just there are not too many performance upgrades for the New Yorker.

The car is very comfortable. It rides similar to a Cadillac. It soaks ups the bumps with ease and begs for more. It has very comfortable seats, and the rear seat is big, although the car isn't too big, which I think is good, as my Grandpa's Crown Victoria seems huge compared to the New Yorker.

The car looks good, and neither I nor my Grandma has have any major engine problems. The only problem I have had is the 1st day I received it, I got up on the engine, and when I got to my house, I turned around in my driveway and I had the wheel cut all the way, and as I shifted in reverse, the engine died, but started right back up. The only thing I think it could be, is it's just is not used to running hard, or a bad fuel pump.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 13th May, 2005

Average review marks: 6.3 / 10, based on 8 reviews