2002 Ford Taurus Reviews

2002 Ford Taurus SEL 3.0 DOHC from North America

Model year2002
Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 3.0 DOHC Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.6 / 10
Distance when acquired100000 miles
Most recent distance141000 miles
Previous carFord Mustang

Summary:

Great reliability along with great gas mileage!

Faults:

The only problem that I have had with my Taurus since purchasing it used in 2010, was that I had a slight vibration in the front at speeds near 55-75 mph. It just turned out to be something loose in the right front; very cheap fix.

General Comments:

I absolutely love my Ford Taurus. It is very quick; the 3.0 DOHC engine Ford put in this car is brilliant. It has lots of pep from a light, and offers great passing ability.

The car is so smooth. While driving around town, I can hardly hear a single thing outside, and when driving over bumps, you hardly can tell you did.

The car gets good gas mileage too; probably would be better if my right foot wasn't so heavy.

All in all, I love this car. It has a lot of features for the money, and at 141,000 well maintained miles, I foresee this car lasting me many, many more. HIGHLY recommended!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 30th July, 2011

8th Aug 2011, 22:17

The Taurus is a very underrated car that offers a lot of value and reliability at a low price. My parents have one, and it still drives like new; very reliable and smooth over bumps. I am a GM person, but would buy a Taurus if I needed a safe, reliable, roomy family sedan. Just the fact that you see tons of them used as taxis is a good sign that they are a great reliable car!

2002 Ford Taurus SE 3.0 Vulcan from North America

Model year2002
Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 3.0 Vulcan Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.3 / 10
Distance when acquired95000 kilometres
Most recent distance140000 kilometres
Previous carVolkswagen Jetta

Summary:

Overall, a comfortable and reliable ride

Faults:

Starting motor went out at 95500 kms.

Coolant lines on firewall rusted out at 105000kms.

Battery replaced at 108000kms.

Total brake replacement (pads, rotors) at 130000kms.

General Comments:

Overall, a comfortable & reliable ride.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 15th March, 2011

2002 Ford Taurus SES 3.0 DOHC 24 Valve from North America

Model year2002
Year of manufacture2002
Most recent year of ownership2010
Engine and transmission 3.0 DOHC 24 Valve Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired3 miles
Most recent distance135502 miles
Previous carFord Taurus

Summary:

The 2002 Taurus is an adequate family sedan, and runs better than most

Faults:

Springs.

Struts.

Brakes.

Motor mounts.

Door latch.

Coil pack.

Ball joints.

Inner tie rods.

General Comments:

The engine has more than enough power.

Interior is well-appointed, and has comfortable leather seats.

Instrumentation is well positioned.

Steering is precise.

Handling is adequate for a sedan.

Mileage is about 26 mpg on the highway.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 6th December, 2010

2002 Ford Taurus SE 3.0L from North America

Model year2002
Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2010
Engine and transmission 3.0L Automatic
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 4 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.0 / 10
Distance when acquired121000 kilometres
Most recent distance147000 kilometres
Previous carPontiac Sunfire

Summary:

A big, slow, boring gas guzzler

Faults:

- Both front wheel bearings replaced.

- Warps front rotors like crazy replaced four times.

- Left rear window doesn't roll down.

- Rust treated under right rear door.

- A/C compressor seized and replaced.

- Serpentine belt replaced.

General Comments:

This car guzzles gas, averaging about 10.3L/100km doing 90% highway. City, you're looking at over 12L/100 easily. My dads '10 Fusion Sport AWD with 165 more horsepower, which weighs 400lbs more, gets better gas mileage than this boat anchor.

It's very slow. The 3.0L V6 16v only puts out 150hp, which is what most 4 cyl's these days produce. It's about as fast as a Hyundai Accent. If you're really interested in this boat, make sure you get the 24v engine.

It handles like an old Cadillac. Floaty suspension over bumps and turns, with tons of body roll. But it's very comfortable for long trips. The seats are huge and can seat four people very comfortably. This car also has a massive trunk for storage, and tons of leg room.

Interior is hideous, but comfortable. Sound system is complete garbage, like most Fords in this era.

All and all, don't get this car. There are so many better cars on the road. I got mine for free, and I would not buy one for $1000. It's painful to drive. I lasted 8 months with it, and bought a new Fusion with a real 3.0L in it. I just can't take it any more!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 20th September, 2010

23rd Sep 2010, 00:05

I'd recommend the 3.0 engine to anyone in one of these Taurus or Sable vehicles. One of the most reliable and tried-and-true engines Ford has built, and first came out in the late '80's. The 3.8 likes to blow headgaskets and the transmission is a weak link, not so much with the 3.0 though. I've seen 'em with well over 270k miles and still going strong on that 3.0 with no overhaul on the motor.

If you MUST have performance then I'd suggest avoiding the Taurus altogether and getting a sports car. The Taurus is a family car, not built for speed. And again, that dang Vulcan 3.0 is practically bulletproof!

30th Oct 2010, 10:52

*orig poster*

I do agree, the drivetrain is bulletproof. Everything else on the car however is known to fall apart. I've owned a '89 Taurus as well, and had similar problems. Mostly electrical gremlins, but that happens on most older American vehicles with power options.

It's a good cheap A to B car, no doubt, if you like getting 19-24MPG. Most 4cyl sedans get better, have more hp, and drive a lot better.

Average review marks: 6.9 / 10, based on 26 reviews