1999 Honda HR-V Reviews

1999 Honda HR-V 1.6 liter 77 kw from Lithuania

Model year1999
Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 1.6 liter 77 kw Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.5 / 10
Distance when acquired120000 kilometres
Most recent distance139000 kilometres
Previous carAlfa Romeo 166

Summary:

Realiable, economical as Jeep

Faults:

Nothing!

General Comments:

I have traveled with it around Europe and everything goes perfect. I really recommend it.

Cheap, because engine and many other parts are interchangable with Civic.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 4th November, 2008

10th Jan 2010, 17:57

This is most useful, as I plan on spending some time in Lithuania, and was wondering what vehicle to buy, considering the winter may be harsh. I've made my mind on the Honda now, especially in the weeks when Britain is undergoing the worst winter in 30 years.

1999 Honda HR-V 1.6 from Australia and New Zealand

Model year1999
Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 1.6 Manual
Performance marks 4 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.7 / 10
Previous carFord Mondeo

Summary:

Fun ride

Faults:

Nothing.

General Comments:

Didn't have time to bond with the car. Owned it for around 8 months.

Poor residuals. I bought it overpriced!

Comfortable cruiser.

Okay design.

Could definitely do with more power.

4 wheel drive works like a charm. Surprisingly, it had no complaints tackling the Australian outback. Exceeded my expectations off road.

Excellent fuel economy. Predictable, top-notch Honda (Japanese) reliablity.

Paint work too thin. Easily scratched.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 5th April, 2005

1999 Honda HR-V 4WD 1.6 from UK and Ireland

Model year1999
Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 1.6 Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.8 / 10
Distance when acquired35000 miles
Most recent distance45000 miles

Faults:

Wheel Bearing had to be replaced (free of charge).

Remote central locking sometimes does not respond.

Rear windscreen washer stopped. (fixed free of charge)

General Comments:

I bought this car as a bit of fun and wanted to tow a jetski occasionally over the summer months. So far it has been a success. The car could do with a larger engine, but it goes fairly well for a 1.6 in an offroad car and revs eagerly all the way to the red-line. However, I seem to only get 32mpg at best on a long journey and about 27 worst in town driving. As for towing I've been faily impressed. It seems to manage the 450kg trailer with ease on the road. When going off-road and pulling it up pebble filled slip ways the 4wd system seems to work fairly well although could do with a center locking diff. It also seems to have enough ground clearance for what most people need. So far I've only got it stuck once, but that was with a 1 tonne trailer on wet grass so is understandable.

As for real world driving, it handles well and steering is good although fairly poor tyres (which are also expensive) are poor both on the road and off it for grip, but do seem to last a long time (28k and still going!). The front seats are fairly comfy too and its practical as long as you don't have children or pets to lug around. I can get a considerable amount of furniture in it!

I'm particularly impressed with the car in town driving. I can see above most traffic and the steering is very light in town (speed-sensitive). Its also very easy to park considering its no longer than a 3 door civic. However, its the motorway journeys its not so good with. It revs to high at anything over 60mph (70=3600rpm) although at 30mph it sits happily in 5th gear.

So overall, I believe this is a good buy if you want something that looks different and can do everything fairly well.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 3rd March, 2005

14th Oct 2008, 09:48

Agree with last comment, 68k on a 1999 and as smooth as a whistle (serviced regular) I also wanna keep for an age, modern day classic, head turner, looks after its daddy in bad weather!

1999 Honda HR-V 1.6 4wd 1.6 petrol from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.6 petrol Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.3 / 10
Distance when acquired70000 miles
Most recent distance80000 miles
Previous carAudi A4

Summary:

A strange looking car, but very practical

Faults:

Nothing major has went wrong with the car - slight rattles from inside the drivers door is the only major defect to date.

General Comments:

A strange vehicle to look at, especially because it is the bright yellow version, but drives like a dream. This vehicle gives you the ride height of a large 4x4 and the performance of a saloon car just the combination that I needed.

The car is a little heavy on the juice of such a small engine, but it is nothing that will break the bank.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 22nd December, 2003

10th Nov 2005, 23:25

If the colour of the HR V is to feminine for you that's one thing, but you could solve your fuel issue by not thrashing the... out of it. Try a service every 5000kms/3100mile and you may receive the same results as my 540kms/336mile per tank... and yes I do get the honda dirty.

Average review marks: 8.3 / 10, based on 7 reviews