2003 Kia Carnival Reviews

2003 Kia Carnival LS from Australia and New Zealand

Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
3.8 / 10
Distance when acquired95000 kilometres

Summary:

Catastrophic failure

Faults:

Critical functions such as power windows, central locking, instrument lights and rear lights will be inoperative if battery is replaced or jump started.

Always have the windows up. Any issues with the battery will mean a very expensive fix to have the computer 'reset', so the windows will work again.

Fuel gauge reads 1/4 full if the car is driven for more than 20 minutes. Always drive on a full tank.

Factory spark plug leads are useless.

Oil warning light only operates after the engine seizes. It will not illuminate if there is any pressure, no matter how minute, in the system. Check oil before using the vehicle.

Plastic parts snap off easily.

Suspension not very robust.

General Comments:

Not recommended for towing trailers.

Comfortable seating arrangement.

Not popular with mechanics.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 6th January, 2011

12th Sep 2012, 00:20

Bought a 2002 Kia Carnival from new.

Engine replaced at 40,000Kms - Kia gave me a new engine outside the warranty period, but the labour cost me >$2000.

Engine problems again at 88000kms - head gasket fault causing severe overheating - this time just <$5000. Have been advised by my mechanic that this will happen again because of faulty engine design. Also tells me there are 3 cambelts. 2 of 6 spark plugs are at the back of the engine, and can only be replaced when the engine is removed.

Basically, stay away from the older models.

2003 Kia Carnival LS 2.4L from Australia and New Zealand

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 2.4L Semi-Automatic
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance42000 kilometres

Summary:

Aside from the price, don't expect too much!

Faults:

Paint faded a few years after purchase.

KIA badge faded.

Interior "wood-grain" finish rubbed off easily.

Engine had to be replaced at 42,000kms.

General Comments:

At the time of purchase, good value for the money.

2.4L engine is underpowered. An option for a larger engine is available.

Comfortable to drive.

However, the exterior/interior looks of the vehicle quickly declined and within a few years, it looked much older than it really was.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 9th September, 2008

2003 Kia Carnival 2.5 6 cylinder from Australia and New Zealand

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 2.5 6 cylinder Manual
Performance marks 0 / 10
Reliability marks 0 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 0 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
1.2 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance61235 kilometres
Previous carDaihatsu Charade

Summary:

Grown from citrus trees

Faults:

Everything.

Broken down 6 times now; only 60000 kays old. That's a break down once every 10k.

Head gasket blew a couple months after purchase; $1400.

Then it blew again a couple of weeks later; $1100.

The hand brake cable snapped.

The seats are worn out already.

Leaks oil from the gearbox.

The bonnet support things don't hold, so the bonnet falls on people.

Blows smoke under moderate throttle.

Various other things; can't remember what they were now.

General Comments:

It's comfortable on trips

Good air con.

The performance is not good; it struggles at highway speeds.

It is just so unreliable; every morning when I go to start it, I think will it go?

My old car was a Daihatsu Charade and it never failed me once; it had over 300 000 kays and was fine.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 15th January, 2008

2003 Kia Carnival LS 2.4 from Australia and New Zealand

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 2.4 Manual
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.4 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance23000 kilometres
Previous carKia Carnival

Summary:

Great value for money compared to other people movers in the market

Faults:

The sliding doors had rubber seals which contained some steel reinforcement that rusted and left a stain on the paint work after a few months. The dealer ordered in the wrong replacement parts and I then decided it was best to simply fix the old parts by coating the exposed steel.

I smelled a burning smell after going up a steep hill recently and took it into the dealer. The dealer has informed me that the clutch has failed. It appears that this may be a known warranty problem as it has been previously reported on this site.

General Comments:

Overall I have been very pleased with our "family bus". It is comfortable and has great space for my family (4 kids). I have recommended it to a few of my friends.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 1st June, 2005

5th Mar 2006, 06:37

Your engine is 2.5 not 2.4.

2003 Kia Carnival LS 2.5 from Australia and New Zealand

Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 2.5 Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.2 / 10
Distance when acquired24 kilometres
Most recent distance2000 kilometres
Previous carToyota Tarago

Summary:

Acceptable for the price in comparison

General Comments:

The finish on the paintwork was well below par with white undercoat showing through the top coat. Negotiations are still being made for a re-spray after four months. In all a very cheap paint job.

Gear shift clunks from 1st to 2nd.

The new 2004 model's interior is a very disappointing colour with insufficient thought placed into it being a people (child) mover. The colours should have been darker for busy child's fingers.

Another disappointing feature of the interior is that the fabric goes all the way to the top of the doors. Fading of the fabric is a concern with it receiving the sun's full strength.

Visually the vehicle is very appealing however when driving the visibility to the rear and that of the bonnet is very limited.

The worst feature of the vehicle in my opinion is that of the 'turning circle'. Until one is use to it, (which is probably never) beware of oncoming traffic and tight situations. It is a very bad design.

The vehicle has been tried in various situations with thumbs up being given to it on steep inclines. The motor is probably still slightly underpowered.

The vehicle is quite comfortable and is very acceptable in slightly longer trips.

Two of the best features would be the dual opening side doors and the passageway from the front of the vehicle to the back.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 24th February, 2004

Average review marks: 5.6 / 10, based on 6 reviews