1999 Lotus Elise Reviews

1999 Lotus Elise 1.8 16v petrol from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.8 16v petrol Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 4 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired3 miles
Most recent distance50000 miles
Previous carMazda MX5

Summary:

Awesome to drive, but quality and durability disappoint

Faults:

Cable for boot/engine cover release (the only method of opening it) broke.

Leaks like a sieve in anything heavier than drizzle.

Strong smell of petrol when the tank contains more than an indicated 30 litres.

Car looks and feels generally tired at 50k. Rattles and squeaks everywhere, the odd clonk from underneath, steering not as sharp as it used to be.

Sudden clutch failure at 11,000 miles.

Gear linkage became detached.

General Comments:

The K-series engine hasn't missed a beat, consumes no oil or water and returns 42 mpg average. Lacks top end welly, but the acceleration up to about 80 mph is enough to see off most other things on four wheels. Lotus dealers are attentive and professional, but seem to be capitalising on charging Lotus servicing costs on what is a bog standard Rover engine. The chassis may be advanced and clever, but it doesn't need any more maintenance than a conventional one.

Handling is astonishing. Not as forgiving as my old MX-5, but with an immediacy and directness like no other car, and with limits that really take some exploring on the public road. Best steering I've ever experienced. Unassisted brakes are terrifying on first encounter (if you've ever been towed you'll know), but are fine once you get used to them. The difference in fun and sharpness between this and the MX-5 is like the difference between the MX-5 and my previous Golf again. It's that good. Get it on a track and it's in its element, as am I for that matter.

Shame about the poor build quality. Feels very "loose" recently with many of the interior fittings either broken, worn or loose. Some play around the dead ahead on the steering which wasn't there 10,000 miles ago. Disappointing after a (much cheaper) MX-5 which did 88,000 miles and still felt as good as new. Hood has never been truly watertight although it's so bad now, it's barely worth putting it up. If Mazda can make an unfailingly watertight hood on a £14,000 car, why can't Lotus on a £20,000 one?

Once you're in the car (no small feat with the roof up, it's like getting through a letterbox), it's surprisingly comfortable. Noise levels are high-ish, but pleasant in quality, and the seats support well. Equipment is poor in order to maximise weight saving, although I think the minimalism is a key part of the car's appeal. It has a decent heater and a stereo - what more do you need?

If it were better built, I'd buy another tomorrow, but as it stands now, I'll probably not.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 9th May, 2004

26th Dec 2004, 15:15

Update on original review:

Now on 55,000 miles and more quality issues are appearing.

1) Headlamp mounting brackets have corroded to the extent where one on the nearside has snapped. This means the headlamp is no longer mounted securely. The cost of replacing these brackets is comparable to replacing a complete headlamp on most family saloons.

2) The hood leak has become so bad that I get a waterfall effect when opening the door after even moderate rainfall, as well as a drenched drivers seat and a windscreen that has more water and condensation on the inside than out. Being told "they all do that" by every expert who looks at the car does not help. I repeat, Mazda can make watertight hoods on the massively cheaper MX-5. Lotus has no excuse.

3) The passenger window alignment started to look incorrect, accompanied by a rattle from the door. On removing the door cars one of the three bolts which should have been holding the window mechanism to the door fell out into my hand. The second was rattling around inside the door, and the third was just clinging on with about 2mm of thread. Window realigned and bolts threadlocked and refitted. Seems OK. For now.

4) There is a strong waft of hot coolant every so often which penetrates the cabin and the general area around the car. No apparent leaks and no fall in level, but it's not my imagination.

5) The alarm has packed up, although the immobiliser still works.

Fun as the Elise is, it's clear that owning an ageing one will be a test of willpower and commitment (and bank balance) to rival any classic British or Italian sports car. I have decided that the car will go this Spring, once the latest list of problems are resolved.

26th Mar 2005, 19:02

Just wanted to thank you for the very detailed and comprehensive review.

Thanks to your review I understand I better go look for something else to replace my old reliable MX-5.

Guess it will be the Opel Speedster 2.2 (Vauxhall VX220) then.

27th Mar 2005, 07:56

I am about to buy one here in Ireland, but I'm not so sure now.

Na I will get one just cause noone else around has one. Ha!

Its going to be a 1999 model so wish me the best.

I hope the Irish weather does not affect me too much AAAAaaaaaaa!

4th Sep 2005, 17:17

I have just bought a 99 Elise (10 days ago) only 26k on the clock.. already the passenger window has decided to part company with the runner and I have noticed minor leaks when it rains or washing it.. but... and it is a BIG, but.. the car is fantastic.. and all I could of wished for.. many a time (yes already) I have had a bad day at work or fall out with my girlfriend, yet you get in the Elise and drive your worries and cares away.. 10 minutes of proper driving and you forget everything.. buy one..just remember you get what you pay for...

1999 Lotus Elise Standard 1.8 from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission 1.8 Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired19000 miles
Most recent distance27000 miles
Previous carCitroen Saxo

Summary:

Good noisy economical fun

Faults:

Started blowing windscreen wiper fuses, and was diagnosed as a faulty wiper motor. Replaced under warranty. A bent wiper arm wasn't covered - £100.

Losing coolant. Booked into garage, and lost a lot more. Diagnosed as a split radiator core rather than the suspected loose pipe connection to the radiator. Replaced under warranty.

The roof leaks sometimes - must learn how to fit it properly every time.

General Comments:

Very economical, noisy with a sports exhaust, but sounds the better for it, and it makes me take the fun way to work.

Picks up a lot of stone chips on the windscreen, and generally it's going quite fast when it gets hit. Only replace the windscreen when it really needs replacing, you'll only need to do it again otherwise.

The dealer has been remarkably helpful, always taking the car in straight away, but never offering a courtesy car or even a lift to the station. They're not that good at contacting the owner either, but better than the Citroen dealers.

I never feel I can 100% rely on the car, so to overcome this I've decided to get a second car as a daily driver. Hopefully I'll appreciate the Lotus more than too.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 29th December, 2002

Average review marks: 7.0 / 10, based on 11 reviews