2005 Mahindra CJ from India


It rocks!

General Comments:

I write for a car mag, Auto India.

I took one of these cars up a mountain that had no road. Believe me, this car can make its own road.

Even at an incline at a 45-degree angle and a heavy payload, the Cj handles like a dream.

But you need time to get used to it. It is inherently unstable while driving, but very predictable in its instability... therefore not beyond a certain realm of control (you need some skill to drive one).

If you want a cushy car, go buy one of those pretentious ‘American’ SUV's.

If you want to go off-road (and I mean the kind of off-road that would snap a land rover like a twig, then look no further.

Sriram Nair.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 18th April, 2006

21st May 2006, 07:21

Yes, well said. I mean look at this picture:


Only few FEW cars can withstand this kind of punishment.

25th Jan 2013, 06:19

Actually Mahindra was assembling Jeep parts with a license... And it's not a bad car, though it's quite old... However recent cars of Mahindra, like the XUV500, are similar to new models of the original Jeep. A bit better in looks, but still look similar.

1992 Mahindra CJ Classic 2.1 diesel from UK and Ireland


Don't even think about buying one, get a real Jeep


The engine (a Peugeot unit built in India) was utter rubbish. It was really noisy and smelly, and would sometimes blow black sooty smoke from the exhaust.

The engine would cut out at traffic lights and roundabouts for no apparent reason.

Aside from the engine: The gearbox was very stubborn, especially when selecting reverse.

It leaked terribly. Its convertible top was a terrible fit and let in water in rain heavier than drizzle.

Terrible build quality: The doors sagged when opened. The dashboard was of similar quality to an '80s Lada.

General Comments:

The Mahindra is a poor Indian-built copy of an AMC Jeep. Whereas the American Jeeps were constantly developed and upgraded, the Mahindra still drove like a 1940s Jeep, only without the ruggedness and build quality.

It looked like a US Jeep, but that's where the similarities ended.

It was uncomfortable, dangerously slow, unstable, badly built, and unreliable.

I bought it because it was different, cheap, and low-mileage. What a mistake.

I can see why it was low-mileage now. I suspect the previous owners used any excuse not to drive it.

If you see one for sale, forget it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 12th October, 2003

14th Feb 2004, 16:12

Shame the reviewer didn't really understand what the Mahindra CJ is all about. It's a 1950's Jeep, for which time has stood still.

The Peugeot engine is fine - certainly not as quiet as the original F-head 'Hurricane' Jeep engine, but really quite well suited to the application. Of course if you're expecting a modern 4x4, you'd be daft to purchase the Mahindra. But if you want a classic 4x4 that will sometimes embarrass a Land-Rover off road, then the Mahindra's just great.

There's a very good owners club at www.mahindra-register.org, and lots of friendly people on the forum there will help you get the best out of your Mahindra.

Primitive? Of course. Uncomfortable? Naturally! But it's one of the few vehicles I've driven that cause people to shout 'Want to sell that, mate?'. When the sun comes out, whip the hood off and drop the windscreen flat. Then head for hills. It's the most fun to be had on four wheels.