2005 Mazda 3 Reviews

2005 Mazda 3 2.0L I4 from North America

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2013
Most recent year of ownership2014
Engine and transmission 2.0L I4 Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.5 / 10
Distance when acquired172000 kilometres
Most recent distance181000 kilometres
Previous carJeep Liberty

Summary:

All it needed was boost and better fuel economy - then it would have been PERFECT!

Faults:

There was a "check engine" light almost immediately after I bought it, and it turns out the O2 sensor is on its way out. There is also considerable wheel vibration while driving at highway speeds, but it tapers off if you go faster.

Additionally, the car has had front and side impacts; the former deployed its airbags in its previous ownership; the ultimate result of this is that the horn doesn't work. The aforementioned side impact has resulted in some VERY minute rust bubbles forming on the B-pillar, about the size of a dime. It's not that bad, so I don't worry about it, because in spite of these, the car is clean.

General Comments:

I was cross-shopping a number of cars to replace my Jeep when I drove home from Northern to West Coast Canada. This one fit our budget and was (and arguably still is) a solid driver with TWICE the fuel economy of my previous vehicle; however, the fuel economy could still be better and the car is sadly sluggish off the line, likely owing to the car's weight (3,400 lbs. is NOT small). However, it is versatile as it can fit me, my now-expecting wife-to-be, our dog, and it STILL has room for a baby seat in the back, plus passengers or cargo.

By far, this car's greatest selling feature is its driving dynamics - that light throttle-off oversteer, tenacious grip and (wheel vibration aside) highway manners make this car one of my favourites out of all the cars I've owned. The car's MacPherson Strut front and Multi-Link rear suspension gives it poise and comfort worthy of rally driving! I do wonder what owning the MazdaSpeed 3 would have been like...

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 2nd March, 2014

2005 Mazda 3 SP23 Limited 2.3 petrol from Australia and New Zealand

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 2.3 petrol Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.8 / 10
Distance when acquired70000 kilometres
Most recent distance78000 kilometres
Previous carMazda Axela

Summary:

Best value for money in the sub $16k range

Faults:

Had some strange problems with the central locking system unlocking and locking the doors at random.

Removed the driver's side central locking controller (mission), and cleaned and applied carbon electric grease - no problems since.

General Comments:

I am a Toyota person through and through, but TOYOTA does not compare to the Mazda 3. No Corolla has the fun and styling or performance.

Ours is the Limited Edition Leather & Bose edition - If you can get this model, grab it! It's not just a fancy badge on the speakers. Sub woofer under the passenger seat, and a good BOSE amp under the driver's seat, great speakers - great sounds!

I rate these cars; before this, we had the Japanese import equivalent (Axela). The Axela is reported as being quicker due to different cams, but it is nominal.

The NZ model has the curtain air bags, which the Axela does not. The Axela has the rain sensing wipers.

Without a doubt, the best handling front wheel drive car I have ever driven.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 18th June, 2011

2005 Mazda 3 GT 2.3 from North America

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2010
Engine and transmission 2.3 Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.5 / 10
Distance when acquired250000 kilometres
Most recent distance261000 kilometres
Previous carFord Escape

Faults:

Bought the car used with 250k on the clock. It needed a rear wheel bearing and a demister fan motor, that's it.

11000kms later, it still starts first time every time.

General Comments:

Very well equipped, totally reliable, and handles like an Alfa Romeo. I can offer no higher praise.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 30th December, 2010

2005 Mazda 3 Hatchback Elegance 1.6 petrol from Finland

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 1.6 petrol Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired1 kilometres
Most recent distance48000 kilometres
Previous carNissan Micra

Summary:

Exciting, beautiful and reliable... want more?

Faults:

Clock was losing time (3-5 minutes per month) but there is a recall for that and it was fixed under warranty for free.

Needed to adjust trunk's lock. During winter time, that temperature drops up to -30C, the sealings shrink and in every road anomaly the hatch was knocking. Moved the lock a few millimetres inwards and it was fixed. Fixed for free under warranty.

A stone hit the front left fog light and broke the crystal. Needed to replace the whole light and the cost was 155€. Dealer wanted 40€ extra for fitting, but I did it by myself.

General Comments:

My relationship with this car didn't start well. This is because I was test driving all possible future cars with my wife and I first sat in the passenger seat. I didn't like what I was seeing or feeling and I was stranged that my wife loved driving it from the first meters. When we changed seats then I understood why... because it is a real pleasure to drive.

Our car has the 1.6L petrol engine and produces 105HP. The engine revs very easily and feels light. The whole car feels light and the steering wheel is fast and accurate. I have never driven a BMW or Porsche, famous for their driving dynamics, but our Mazda 3 feels extraordinary. I am not a driving God and I haven't pushed it to the limits, but even with more speed than usual and on icy roads, it doesn't surprise you. It just slowly gives you messages and it slides progressively. Sometimes understeers and if the front wheels find grip, it oversteers. All nice and calm.

We got this size of car and not a smaller city car in case we get a kid. The irony is that a couple of months ago we got twins... We thought we would have to change our beautiful and sporty 3 with the 6 Sport Wagon (yes, again Mazda). But after all we managed to fit in the trunk a twin baby stroller (Teutonia S4) and in the rear seat, two isofix baby seats. So, it will be with us some more!

On September 2005 that we bought our 3, Mazda Finland was celebrating its 40 years of presence in Finland and it was offering the 1.6 Elegance with the Touring Pack 1 for free. This one included 16" aluminium wheels with 205/55R16 Bridgestone Turanza tyres, fog lights, automatic climatism, metallic color and trip computer (gift value was 1650€). What we were getting as standard was front, side and curtain airbags, ABS with EBD, front&rear power windows, electric&heated mirrors (a must in this country), heated front seats, CD/radio, leather steering wheel and gear shift, remote locking etc. In this country you rarely get any gifts from the car dealerships and only the new Scoda Octavia and Nissan Primera (on offer) could match a bit Mazda 3's accessory list.

Our car seems to be very reliable. Almost 50.000km and nothing mechanical or electrical has gone wrong. A few times I have started it cold in -27C and started immediately! It warms up quickly and the auto clima doesn't need constant adjustment (too hot or too cold). Even the gearbox warms up fast during winter time and in motorway driving in -31C it kept the engine and us nice and warm. Others have complained about strange sounds and squeaks, but only during winter time (that plastics shrink) you might hear something while driving on bad surfaces. It seems that a big rubbery plastic piece that covers the steering column from above rattles sometimes (located between the steering wheel and the organs).

What I don't like is the dark interior. Everything is black in there. The seats, the doors, the dashboard, the carpets. All dark and gloomy. The dashboard has the piano black inserts and they look good, but they get dust and tiny scratches easily. The dashboard is nice, but I cannot understand why they have used so many different types of plastic instead of one. Even on the radio unit, you have different pieces. On the top of the dashboard there are about 4 or 5, all with different texture. Why? Who thought it would look good?

The second matter is that it is very loud in there. The tyre roar is loud and in motorway driving the music is more noise than pleasure. We had noticed it while test driving it, but we didn't think that it would be bothering us that much during long driving. I think the face lifted model has more sound isolation and I hope it makes life more comfortable.

It seems that during designing, two things weren't thought properly. In the sedan, there isn't a handle to lift the trunk and in our hatchback there is a nice hole that collects dirt, water, snow and ice.

As I already mentioned, the engine is a gem and the gearbox is very slick and accurate. The first gear isn't all that nice because it feels too long and you need a lot or RPM if you need to accelerate fast. For example, if you are facing uphill and need to wait for a gap in the oncoming traffic to turn, the first gear might let you down. Second and third feel perfect for me, while fourth and fifth are perfect for cruising.

The view from inside is good and not claustrophobic. The rear window is large enough to see from and with correct side mirror adjustment, there aren't any rear blind spots. The A-pillars are thick like in all new cars and sometimes you cannot see oncoming traffic while turning.

What I like is that the rear door windows open all the way down and not until the middle like in most cars. I love it as a kid and I still love it.

Already visited the dealership twice for the 20.000 and 40.000km service intervals and the costs were about 120€. Not expensive for an authorised dealership servicing a new car in Finland (high wages-high costs).

Two years have passed and the Winning Blue metallic paint still looks like new. I have never washed the car in a car wash with brushes, but with pressurized water. It has some stone chips on the front, but they never manage to chip all the layers of the paint. Usually, until the base coat. I use an original touch-up paint kit that includes paint and lacquer.

I guess that the conclusion is that two years after and we still love this car like the first day we got it. I don't look at other cars and thinking that I should have bought something else. It has some things that bother me, but they are only the 10% of the whole car-human relationship.

It is exciting, beautiful and reliable... it makes me wonder why people still buy those dull Corollas...

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th September, 2007

9th Jul 2012, 05:23

ORIGINAL AUTHOR - UPDATE:

Our Mazda3 was part-exchanged last year's April for a brand new Mazda6 2.0 DiSi SportWagon. It had been driven only 72.000 km and was still in excellent condition. It never broke down, and even the battery was still strong after 5,5 years of usage. During its annual MOTs, the bottom and all suspension & drive train was still clear of rust, even though they salt the roads here extensively during the winter.

Interior still looked like new, without any extra rattling sounds, or fading in plastics or fabrics. All previous rattles in the cabin were addressed during servicing and eliminated.

This model is not anymore in production, but I'd advise anyone thinking of buying a used one to go for it.

My comment concerning the road noise might not be apparent in other countries, where softer asphalt compounds are used. Finnish tarmacs have large stones to cope with the studded winter tires, otherwise they would need resurfacing every year.

Consumption was relatively low, spending just 8,8L/100km in the city and around 6,7L/100km during motorway traveling. These are the lowest values I could get with a very light foot and calm driving.

Driving with 5th gear above 110km/h was getting loud, with RPM over 3500 and consumption rising. Sometimes it felt that a longer 5th gear or an extra 6th could be better for motorway driving. Other than that, its gearbox was amazingly smooth and sharp at the same time (unlike our current 6's)

Conclusion:

We are not yet sure if it was wise to change the car to our current one. The newest Mazda6 is more spacious and offers more comfort, but our previous 3 was filling our needs just fine, even with its smaller luggage space. Both me and my wife feel like we are driving a boat, instead of a compact and nimble car that can handle city runs and traveling just fine.

Average review marks: 8.5 / 10, based on 15 reviews