1999 Mercedes-Benz E-Class Reviews

1999 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E320 AWD sedan 3.2 from North America

Model year1999
Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2012
Engine and transmission 3.2 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.8 / 10
Distance when acquired145000 miles
Most recent distance185000 miles
Previous carMercedes-Benz S-Class

Summary:

Outstanding vehicle and value for the money

Faults:

Front wheel bearings (at about 165000).

Fuel tank needed reworking (wouldn't feed last 1/4 tank, known recall issue).

Very slow A/C leak, treated with sealer.

Right rear window regulator needed replacing at around 175000 miles.

General Comments:

This car has been absolutely solid and reliable.

It handles very well and is remarkably comfortable on long trips.

Even at 185000 miles, it runs like new. It gets around 28 MPG on the freeway, and looks great inside and out.

I upgraded the tires and wheels, mounting S-Class wheels with tires that had the same OD as the originals. These noticeably improved the ride, which was a bit harsh with the original 17" AMG wheels. Now it is very smooth and comfortable at any speed.

According to Consumer Reports, these have above average electrical issues, but I have never had even a hint of one.

Paid $7000 a few years ago, and could probably get close to that now.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 3rd September, 2012

17th Feb 2013, 20:37

I have a 1999 E300, which I ordered and received in Oct 1998. It has been a wonderful car. Replaced the MAF, glow plugs, just done regular maintenance. Only have 65,800 miles on it, and it is a great car.

1999 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 220 CDI Avantgarde 2.2 CDI from Portugal

Model year1999
Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership2009
Engine and transmission 2.2 CDI Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 3 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance250000 kilometres
Previous carVolkswagen Passat

Summary:

A betrayal to Mercedes' great reputation. I'd rather drive my Citröen ZX

Faults:

The original CD player stopped working after 4 years.

The doors rusted around the rubber seals after 8 years.

The driver's side window mechanism has been replaced after 10 years. Now the switch needs replacement.

The paint on the switches wears badly; so much that they turn white in less than 10 years of (not much) use.

There was a huge fuel leak in the high-pressure part of the fuel system after a visit to the dealer about a worn clutch.

General Comments:

The car feels as heavy as it really is.

The suspension rolls and squats far too much for it to be a "sporting version".

The front seats were designed for fat people, so, they feel more like bench seats as a skinny occupant will slide around the leather seats.

Braking is good, but has failed at least once.

Fuel economy is very good for the weight of the car.

It doesn't drip, but it does burn a lot of oil.

The "self adjusting" headlights aim too near.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 12th March, 2009

13th Mar 2009, 15:31

You're complaining because you've manage to squeeze 250,000 km in ten years out of a 4-cylinder Mercedes with no mechanical breakdown? Everyone I know has had one electric window motor problem at least once in their cars within 10 years. And if all you're worried about is the paint on the power window button which doesn't last 10 years (but still functions), count yourself lucky. Mercedes had a bad reputation for the most of the '90s because of reliability problems.

1999 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 320 from Sweden

Model year1999
Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 320 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired160000 kilometres
Most recent distance167000 kilometres
Previous carBMW M5

Summary:

A motorway cruiser

Faults:

PDC can play up at times.

I cannot seem to get the gear lever into the lower gears (1,2,3).

Suspension problem that can make the car unstable at high speeds when the road surface deteriorates. Will get this checked out by my dealer.

AC only blows hot or cold, started last week.

Cruise control has a mind of its own.

Electrics in general are a bit unreliable.

General Comments:

This is my first Mercedes having previously only had BMWs, and well it's different. I needed a large car in order to get all my stuff down to France where I now work, and this car fit the bill.

Handling/Performance:

The closest thing I can compare the handling of this car to is a Chevy. BMWs are a lot harder and really stick to the road surface. In the Benz you float, which is nice for long journeys, but does not inspire spirited driving. I bought this car as an Autobahn cruiser and it performs according to my expectations. It takes you quickly from point A to B in comfort.

Performance wise it's not bad. I have the 3.2L V6 engine, which develops around 220-230 hp. This may sound like a lot, but coupled with the automatic gearbox and the weight of the car, makes for average acceleration. The BMW 525 with a manual gearbox actually feels faster. However, this car was not designed as a racer and unlike the BMW you can comfortably cruise at 170-180 kph without too many revs. It's quite a thirsty engine. so avoid taking it around town or in traffic jams.

Comfort:

You buy a BMW for fun, freude am fahren. You buy a Benz for comfort. This really is a comfortable car and the drivers seat is a wonderful place to be. I sometimes drive for 7-8 hours straight without breaks, and feel just as fresh as when I departed. If I spend the same amount of time in some other cars I own, I can barely walk.

My car has the Avantgarde package, which includes leather seats, GPS etc etc. If you want to travel in the upmost comfort, then I can recommend this car to you.

Quality:

The old W124 (the previous E class) was built like a tank and Mercedes felt that these cars were over engineered. So on this model they, unfortunately, cut back on quality. My car has been good will repainted at Mercedes due to rust issues. The car does feel solid, but cannot be compared to the older models.

In my car the electrics have a bit of mind of their own;

My cruise control doesn't always engage, and when it does, will cancel itself when it feels like it.

My seat head rest won't always adjust. The PDC will not always work properly.

My AC suddenly (last week) decided it will either freeze or roast me to death. There seems to be no in between to hot or cold.

I also have some kind of suspension issue at the moment, I will update this review when I have it checked out.

Conclusion:

I love this car. It looks great and it has huge amounts of space. It's extremely comfortable and relatively fast. If you need a car that can transport you, 4 others and a lot of luggage quickly, comfortably and safely, then this car is for you. I recommend it, but make sure you get one that has been well taken care of, and watch out for quality issues.

Pros: Looks good, comfortable and safe. Has huge amounts of luggage space. Pretty fast for its weight, and will cruise at 160+ with no complaints.

Cons: Some serious quality issues, the main culprit being rust. Due to its weight, the suspension really suffers and parts wear fast. Rather thirsty, expect about 12 l per 100km.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 2nd November, 2007

10th Sep 2009, 06:24

After all that trouble you have with your benz, you still believe it's a good car?

Average review marks: 7.8 / 10, based on 14 reviews