Similar Mercury Topaz reviews

1993
USA Flag Canada Flag

Topaz GS

Nothing more reliable

27 words
1992
USA Flag Canada Flag

Topaz GS

Very Fast Cruising, Semi-Fuel Efficient, Extremely Comfortable, GREAT Handling!

671 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Topaz

Reliable, but gutless

502 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Topaz GL

A lackadaisical, sluggish, boring, but roomier than my current car

322 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Topaz GS

Nice one, but needs a lot of attention!

290 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Topaz GS

Best first car!

242 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Topaz GLS

Very unreliable

192 words
All Mercury Topaz reviews

1992 Mercury Topaz GL review from North America

"A lackadaisical, sluggish, boring, but roomier than my current car"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

The brakes are absolutely horrible, no matter how new the brakes are they squeak and sometimes grind and it takes some serious leg power to stop the car.

The car is the slowest I have ever driven. When going up a hill, it almost feels as if you might just roll back down when approaching the top. That is scary!

What is also scary, is when I need to make a quick left turn before oncoming traffic and the accelerator doesn't want to work or appears stuck.

The a/c compressor went out at 69,000 miles.

The battery cables corroded easily and often and the car wouldn't start until I cleaned them or replaced the cables.

The engine was very weak (despite that it was a V6) and had a lot of pinging after it warmed up which would also result in a loss of engine power.

This car ate through tires.

Motorized seat belts got stuck a lot.

Had recall on the ignition-- it could catch fire at any time and cause serious facial burns.

The temperature gage was always on the high end.

General comments?

This car was the slowest thing I have ever driven and anyone who says it had good power obviously doesn't have much experience driving other cars.

This car had a 3 liter V6 engine, but it felt like 4 cylinder 50 horsepower engine and that isn't an exaggeration.

I took excellent care of this car and so did the previous owner, so it should have been a better car. Obviously Ford just sucks!!

Only positive thing was that the engine was very quiet at stops and you couldn't tell that it was even on.

It got better gas mileage than the manufacturer specified. I did take good care of the pile of junk.

It is also pretty roomy.

Oh yeah, did I mention the heater didn't work?

It got repossessed before it could cause me any further problems.

2 comments

Recommended reviews

USA Flag Canada Flag

1992 - Topaz 2.3L 4-cylinder

Reliable, but gutless

USA Flag Canada Flag

1992 - Topaz GS V6 3.0 Liter Man 5 Speed

Nice one, but needs a lot of attention!

All 1992 Mercury Topaz reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Year of manufacture1992
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership2001
Engine and transmission 3.0 liter V6 Automatic
Performance marks 2 / 10
Reliability marks 4 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks  
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 5.0 / 10
Distance when acquired68000 miles
Most recent distance88000 miles
Previous carOldsmobile Cutlass
Date of Entry 6th November, 2002

All Mercury Topaz reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews