2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Reviews - Page 3 of 3

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 8 2.0 turbo from North America

Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 2.0 turbo Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 4 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired3 miles
Most recent distance700 miles
Previous carAcura Integra

Summary:

A high performance bargain

Faults:

Nothing has gone wrong with this car.

General Comments:

Driven hard, the EVO 8 is awesome. In terms of brakes and handling, this EVO is nearly track ready. Adding just $2K worth ECU programming, down pipe and cat-back exhausts to a stock EVO 8, I can't think of anything under $40K that will touch it on the track in the US.

The turbo has no lag, starts to spool at 2900 rpm, and it'll push you back hard starting at 3300 rpm and levels off at 5000-6000 rpm, there is little point in taking it to the 7000+ rpm red-line without exhausts system upgrades. This is while running 91-octane premium gas. My understanding is that it would do better on 93-octane gas, but 93-octane gas not readily available in Southern California.

The standard 6 speaker AM/FM/CD sound system is pretty good.

The HID headlights are excellent, as an added bonus, they are height adjustable from within the car and the car comes factory stock with additional driving lights.

In terms of daily use, the EVO's gas mileage is not good for a light car with a 4 cylinder engine. (I'm getting 18 mpg combined) It's tuned to run pretty rich (safe). However, I don't think people buy EVO's for the gas mileage. Additionally, the mileage should improve significantly with more aggressive tuning associated with the ECU reprogramming and exhausts system upgrades.

The steering is quick to the point of being a little nervous. This can be tiring for a daily driver for some people.

The stiff suspension is pretty hard on your kidneys on freeway expansion joints at 10-30 mph. A little like a slammed sub-compact with stiff springs.

The sight lines out front are excellent; the large carbon fiber rear wing is located exactly at the height where it interferes with the rear view from the center mirror. The Right side wing support distracts a little bit for over-the-right-shoulder view during right hand lane changes on the Freeway.

The transmission gear ratio and spacing works well, but the shifter is not as good as Honda or BMW, it's a little bit notchy. The clutch is a little bit heavy, but this is to be expected for a performance car.

The Recaro bucket seats are excellent.

The huge Brembo brakes are great. However, the pads are a little noisy, dusty and likely to wear quickly for a daily driver, but brake pads should be easy and reasonably cheap to replace.

The heater, AC and defroster all work well.

I want to be clear; the negatives I have stated above are very minor for people looking for a reasonably priced high performance automobile and should be expected for this level of performance.

This car has an amazing level of performance for not too much money!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th March, 2004

26th Feb 2005, 10:57

In response to the brakes. They are quite expensive. Just the pads cost me $185 for the front alone. The tires (as you probably already know) are really expensive and need to be replaced around 10,000 miles. My neighbor works for Mitsubishi and he told me that it is quite common to need tires before that. It's an incredible automobile, but the cost of maintaining this car is up there with cars costing twice as much. I love the car, but it cost a little more to maintain than my previous car- a 1998 BMW M3- which was $48K. I guess that's the price you pay for extreme performance.

6th Apr 2006, 23:58

I would recommend a harder compound tire. That would lengthen the time that you need betwen tire changes. The Advans that come from the factory are as soft as a street tire can be. If you put on low profile tires that had a 40,000 mile guarantee, you're wallet might be a lot happier. Sure you'll get a little less performance from the tires, (you won't be able to take a 90 degree turn at 45 mph with no tire squeal) but unless you get sponsored, any car that has those Advans on will eat them up quickly. You can also get the brake pads for a better price if you do some shopping around. I found front and back pads for $175 with just a little bit of work. They are a little expensive, but it feels like punishment to drive almost anything else.

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer O.Z. 2.0-litre four-cylinder from North America

Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 2.0-litre four-cylinder Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired2 miles
Most recent distance9054 miles
Previous carFord Mustang

Summary:

A fun and reliable car to own

Faults:

As of now I have had no problems with the car.

General Comments:

The car is my daily driver and I have put a little over 9,000 miles in six months on the car, but it seems to take this all in stride.

I haven't had to use the manufacturers warranty yet tho I do push the car hard on the weekends.

A new set of tires did help with the handling a great deal.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th January, 2004

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO VIII FQ 300 2.0 turbo from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 2.0 turbo Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired45 miles
Most recent distance1500 miles
Previous carVolkswagen Golf

Summary:

An everyday 4 door saloon with break neck speed and performance

Faults:

Nothing has gone wrong with it as yet!!

General Comments:

What a car. I had a Volkswagen Golf 4motion before and I thought that was quick. We test drove an Evolution VIII at our local garage and fell in love with it there and then.

This car is like a sleek jet plane.

There is no turbo lag and the steering is phenomenal.

We couldnt really test it out to its full strength until it had its first service at a 1000 miles. (servicing is regular and expensive, the one downside to owning a car like this).

The cabin is clean and spacious and the recaro seats hug you tight as you hit G-force. We went all out and had a Kenwood touch screen audio/SAT NAV system added to finish it off.

Great fun, hugely fast, practical. GET ONE.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 2nd December, 2003

Average review marks: 7.9 / 10, based on 10 reviews