1992 Mitsubishi RVR Reviews

1992 Mitsubishi RVR Super Sports Gear 2.0 turbo from Botswana

Year of manufacture1992
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 2.0 turbo Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.3 / 10
Distance when acquired97000 kilometres
Most recent distance104000 kilometres

Summary:

Rally car performance, minivan utility. Fantastic

Faults:

Ventilation fan rattles slightly.

The drivers window/frame oscillates a touch a speed and lets in some wind roar- seems as if the 1.6 RVR body wasn't reinforced to suit the high velocities the 2.0T can achieve...

General Comments:

As I have summarised, this is a rally car in the Subaru Impreza WRX mode, yet with a surprisingly practical (for it's small size) MPV like body.

This car starts with the engine. The 2.0 Turbo from the Lancer rallycar producing somewhere in the region of 220bhp- so this is not a cooking turbo then, putting out over 100hp/litre. It's good for trickling around town and lets rip at 3,000rpm: the speed the engine gains revs has to be felt to be believed, and it pulls to over 7,000rpm.

This startling performance is kept in order by a 4x4 transmission of I suspect more rally than bush-bashing heritage. the suspension seems to be stiffened over the standard 1.6 and the brakes likewise. Cornering is amazingly flat for such an apparently high-bodied car- all the weight is obviously kept low. The long-throw manual gearbox is at odds with the sporting nature of the drive; the 'box itself seems quite sweet it's just the clumsy long lever that makes smooth changes when pressing on difficult. Potential for shortening the lever was never explored.

The interior is complete with recaro-style seats, but is only a four seater; the single sliding rear passenger door is a good feature giving additional van-like utility, and also allowing a useful storage compartment to be built against the drivers side. The arrangement could be less than ideal if you regularly use 4 seats, more so because the windows are the pop-open type rather than wind down. Then again the climate control is good so maybe that's not a problem.

For luggage the seats can slide way forward and even fold down leaving good space; they can be pushed right back to leave room for rear seat passengers to stretch their legs straight out- useful as there is curiously limited depth the the rear wells (4x4 transmission intrusion, I suspect). The only problem is doing both (legroom & luggage space) at once, though considering this is roughly the same size as the ubiquitous corolla, it's not so bad. The rear tailgate also allows maximum access.

Fuel consumption is commensurate with the performance- it may improve if you can stop from enjoying open roads at every other opportunity, but if you are capable of that, you may as well stay in the monastery- it's a truly beguiling drive. This car may therefore be less desirable in Britain than Africa and other RHD countries with cheaper fuel. The fuel tank is also straight off the 1.6 yielding a range of around 350km which can be a hindrance in more sparsely populated areas.

I find it hard to conceive of another small car that could be this good. I hardly had it long enough to experience any problems- and that specific output did worry me- but if I was moving to another left-driving country there would be no question I'd take it with me. And as a replacement for a Toyota Prado (very different car, but also very good- and also 4 times the price...) gave the RVR a lot to live up to and it has blown expectations into the weeds. The LHD variant (Space shuttle?) doesn't seem to have any of the appeal in the standard version, let alone this mutant top-of the ranger, and seem to have sold pretty poorly as a result. So I can only wait 'til I get to a country that drives on the left again, and make tracking one of these beasties down my first priority...

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 22nd July, 2004

1992 Mitsubishi RVR Sportsgear TD 2.0 turbo diesel from Australia and New Zealand

Year of manufacture1992
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 2.0 turbo diesel Automatic
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 3 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 3 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
3.8 / 10
Distance when acquired74000 kilometres
Most recent distance110000 kilometres
Previous carToyota TownAce

Summary:

I have scraped better things off my shoes

Faults:

Exhaust manifold works loose since most of the weight from the turbo hangs from it, took it in to service agent to be rectified, stripped holes in head were re-threaded and fitted.

A few months it ran very poorly, took it to a different service agent who found that the previous repairer had not replaced manifold gasket, but had used gun gum on the old gasket, parts had been sucked through the turbo and the impeller was destroyed so new turbo.

Engine burning oil, mechanic found that intake pipes had gone soft and were collapsing under boost causing the engine to suck in oil through the breather pipe.

Developed a tapping noise, had swivels on rockers replaced.

Automatic started making a bump when taking off from an almost stop and holding onto gears too long. Had box checked, adjusted and serviced. This has improved matters, but still not right.

Engine developed rattle, big end bearings blown. This vehicle had been having oil changes every 5,00km and full service every 10,000km. Was told that the crank was damaged and the pistons had contacted the head and would need replacement motor.

General Comments:

Very poor performance and thirsty for a diesel. After the engine problems I purchased a cheap toyota diesel for less than the price for the motor being replaced to use for work in the meantime, I have found this has more power, a smoother gearchange and is more economical than the RVR, it is a 1.8 non turbo diesel. Have decided that the RVR is to be reassembled and flicked off and I will hold onto the toyota and sacrifice the creature comforts to have something more reliable and economical, will never touch a Mitsi again.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 13th September, 2003

16th Apr 2004, 07:16

I am sorry to here you have all there problems with your RVR. I also have the turbo version and have had none of what you stated. The only major maintenance I have had done in over 120000k is timing/balance shaft belts being changes. Other than that regular oil changes and tie-rod ends replaced after 90000k I believe. My RVR has been used mainly for a work commuter and weekend trips camping or the the beach. I am also in Japan so it is not vary hard for me to get replacement parts if needed.

Average review marks: 6.0 / 10, based on 2 reviews