1995 Nissan Micra Reviews - Page 4 of 5

1995 Nissan Micra L 1.0 from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1995
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2001
Engine and transmission 1.0 Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.0 / 10
Distance when acquired31800 miles
Most recent distance39300 miles
Previous carVolkswagen Polo

Summary:

Reliable, sensible cars for sensible people

Faults:

Leaking rear wheel cylinder (35000 miles).

General Comments:

I have to say first off I think these little cars are seriously underrated.

Understated 'cuddly' looks ensure you shouldn't draw too much unwanted attention, and the lack of 'youth appeal' is a big plus point in my opinion.

The only thing so far to have gone wrong is listed above: not unreasonable on a five year old car anyway. Superb reliability, just can't find fault!

Very little maintenance has been necessary, except for changing the oil and filter every 3000 miles/six months, which has to be the golden rule on these chain driven 16V engines. I always make a point of sticking religiously to this as it is certainly the most important preventative measure you can take for the long term reliability of the engine. And it is not a difficult job either. (Use a good quality semi-synthetic oil).

Performance is great for a one litre; twin cam engine revs sweetly and pulls well. Much quicker and more fun to drive than my old Polo 1050cc, and more economical too!

Ride and handling may perhaps fall a bit behind some of the newer super-minis, but are perfectly acceptable. Grips road and brakes very well.

Delightfully smooth and light gear change.

Upright driving position ensures good visibility.

Painless to own - just does everything well. No really annoying points.

Running costs are as low as you will find for a car of its age. Fuel consumption is very reasonable, as is insurance (group 3).

Bad points? Well, build quality and finish is not quite up to the best Germanic standards. Whilst everything has stayed in place so far (interior trim, etc.), there are one or two rattles in the cabin. Check the paint work carefully when choosing one. Check for 'misses' in engine compartment and other out-of-the-way areas, and for faded finish on red models - mine is oxidising already on bonnet. (Being kept outside all the time can't have helped here...)

I also recommend waxoiling the underside, as there is no factory underseal / weather protection, and the UK climate will quickly take its toll if it is left exposed.

Very reasonable second hand prices now makes these a wise choice used - a same aged Polo (my second choice at the time) costs a lot more.

Service items I have purchased so far (all original Nissan parts) have not been particularly cheap, but not too overpriced either. But, with this models rock-solid reputation for reliability, you shouldn't need to buy too many parts, should you...

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 14th July, 2001

3rd Aug 2002, 12:44

I wrote the above review. Just wanted to say I am now up to 49000 miles and 27 months of ownership. Passes MOT's every time, though on the last one the rear fog light wasn't working. This was due to the bulb holder which had worked loose, allowing the bulb to loose contact. It is a two-piece design, like a case which clips together. The tester had seen this before on the K11, so it may be a common fault. It can be rectified by taping the two halves together.

Otherwise I cannot find fault. Still drives like new and the only maintenance needed has been regular oil and filter changes. Very light on brake linings. Front pads/discs still have plenty of life left and they are the originals!

I definitely intend to buy Nissan again, though I cannot bring myself to get rid of this car - it's just too good! I very much doubt I could have bought any other type of small car of a similar age and run it so long without a single significant problem.

7th May 2007, 10:29

Excellent review. I couldn't agree with you any more. Wishing you many years of happy motoring in your Micra.

1995 Nissan Micra GX 1.0 16v DOHC from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1995
First year of ownership1997
Most recent year of ownership2000
Engine and transmission 1.0 16v DOHC Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 1 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.2 / 10
Distance when acquired16000 miles
Most recent distance29000 miles
Previous carFord Fiesta

Summary:

A great supermini, which is reliable into the bargain

Faults:

The ECU failed a week after being serviced and cost me £1000 for replacement, even more annoying was the fact the car was a few days out of its warranty.

General Comments:

A nice car but due to the awful service I received from the dealer I would never consider another Nissan.

The car itself is easy to drive and quite responsive and eager.

The dealers were rude, unhelpful and very stubborn - just goes to show that customer care sells cars.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 8th October, 2000

Average review marks: 8.1 / 10, based on 15 reviews