Summary:
It doesn't endear itself to you
General Comments:
Drove one of these for two days as a hire car around the Isle of Man.
Seemed to be well, if somewhat cheaply made.
It was economical.
It was reliable for the two days I had it.
The boot was tiny.
The stereo and speakers were very very poor and the buttons on the stereo very confusing.
Gearchange was only adequate.
Engine was not nice.
Seemed very underpowered in terms of torque. Isle of Man is hilly and it constantly laboured.
The 3 cylinder engine sounded really unpleasant. The engine note is not pleasant and there was a constant drone from the engine.
In its class it is not the best car. My daily drive is a V6 Rover 75, which is very refined, but I also drive a Fiat Panda regularly, and the Panda is the much better car. The Panda is a joy to drive thanks to slick gearchange and buzzy willing four cylinder engine.
There is nothing endearing about the PIXO.
It's entirely adequate in nearly every respect except for boot space, but I wouldn't / couldn't live with it for any length of time.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 18th November, 2009
1st Jan 2010, 09:45
Fair comments; however the Isle of Man is really hilly with small awkward bumpy roads with the need for constant gear changing. I've driven a 1.6 litre over there, and even that struggled a great deal with the difficult roads and constant gear changing. We need to remember that the Pixo is a city car, designed for around town driving (ie: the heart of London, or nipping in and out of a flat supermarket car park). I'd never consider one for the Isle of Man as none of the roads are as smooth or flat like the mainland UK. (I know because I lived on the island for 22 years) - the roads on the mainland are smoother and wider. The Pixo would be almost useless over there... the suspension would be put to it's limits and poor gear box trashed.
We hired a Pixo for Manchester City and it was good... coped fine and we were generally pleased with its performance all round.
