2006 Pontiac GTO Reviews - Page 4 of 4

2006 Pontiac GTO from North America

Model year2006
Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired2 miles
Most recent distance1500 miles
Previous carGMC Sierra

Summary:

The do anything, car guy's, family car

Faults:

Nothing so far.. very new.. will update if needed.

General Comments:

Unlike some, I think this car stays true to the name GTO. Many are confused on what a muscle car is, or a GTO is. No one is upset that the bonneville has gone through many itterations, or the camaro or firebird. But the GTO they want to be a retro 1970 A body car. Well. What you get in the 06 GTO is the same as what you got in the 70 GTO, and I speak from experience, owning both and growing up in GM A body cars. The GTO was mom's lemans with too much engine and some style upgrades. The new GTO is the same thing. A nice half way point between Corvette and Cadillac. You can take the kids to school, take the wife to dinner, then take it to the track, then take it cross country. It will fit in anywhere.

The car is a real 2+2. 2 adults (i am 6'3") can fit in the back with 2 adults in the front seats in full length. The seats in the front aren't large, but are very supportive, and not in that way too narrow for anyone, but the small way. The seats have a nice finish to them, unlike old caddy leather, they grip. As well the bolsters keep you in the seat. They are 8 way (i think) adjustable.. all the same ways as a cadlilac seat.. 10 way with the lumbar? (kinda funny, the lumbar knob can only be reached with the door open.)

Of course everyone cares about the gas mileage now-a-days. Well it does really well (considering the HP) when you are on the highway and keep your foot out of it. I am averaging 22mpg in mostly side street and slow and go traffic, with a ride home on open highway. For those days I reset the trip computer on the highway, I get far better than the 25 mpg estimate. more around 30-32mpg. But in city only driving it averages about 20 mpg (these numbers are based on the trip computer mpg calculator, but calculations at fill up jive with the numbers.)

Performance wise, the car goes like a skinned cat. There are no public streets where you can really stretch this cars legs. The suspension is a perfect balance of soaking up the road and performance handling. Not too harsh, not too soft. The steering is precise for its class (ie impala/monte) and is quite firm with good road feel. In a U-turn, its very easy to goose the throttle and whip the back end around if one is inclined to do so. But as easy as it is to break the back end free, you have to want to do it. It sticks to the ground well, although traction control is a must in the rain. I am a fairly experienced sport driver, and I haven't had it "get away" from me. But I imagine some could. 400 hp and 400 ft/lb give it atypical characteristics compared to front drive sedans.

Storage room isn't great. The trunk is taken up with what looks to be cross members for the suspension and body stiffening and maybe gas tank. Much smaller than average for its class, maybe 3 golf bags and some small luggage.. but that's FULL. Interior storage around the driver is good. the console is decent sized and has a couple trays for odds and ends, and theres a small storage compartment under the radio and under the console facing the rear seat. I imagine its it's australian roots that give it only 2 smaller cup holders, vs an american SUV's 12 or so. And considering that its got room for 2 adults in the back, a cup holder for them would be nice.

I see people complain about entering the rear seat. Well, it's a two door, its as easy as my 70 gto, or the wife's mini. But yea, it can be a bit of a struggle for the old and tall. My kids have no problem hopping in and out of the back. Though head room is limited, I would bump my head on a speed bump I imagine.

THE SOUND. Where this car is truly RETRO is the sound. Considering modern emission standards, it couldnt possibly sound more like a GTO. It pops and sputters when down shifting for slowing, it almost lopes at idle, the car vibrates noticeably at idle as well. It could wake up the neighbors when you come home late, but, with the windows rolled up at highway speeds, its no louder than most. With the windows open on the highway or the radio on, the exhaust is not noticeable.

Mustang has blown away GM and Dodge with their exhaust note for decades. The GTO is quite possibly the most gutsy sounding car on the road.

Blaupunkt... The stereo holds an expensive monicre.. But its not "all that" It sounds great, but the youth won't be impressed. 10 speakers that all push out the same range. Good luck finding one to fit in its place too, it's a very large console 6 disc changer.

Lug nuts... just a little not so picky complaint. The lug nuts on the car are standard steel lug nuts. So they put these really dumb injection molded grey plastic caps on there. They don't seem to stay on well. Haven't lost one, but as soon as I find a set of real lug nuts, i'll lose them on purpose.

Would I change anything on the gto? Well... frankly i'd probably dump the spoiler. Change the auto headlight nob to something that made more sense. I still haven't figured out what all the symbols are. Best I can figure is... the lights are always on and I don't mess. Nope.. it has few appointments outside the stereo and extensive trip computer. Pretty spartan. No "auto climate control" no auto dimming mirror. no memory seat settings. Pretty simple, yet not lacking.

Get one.

I see the complaints about the tranny... and well GM products will have other glitches. But that's a good tranny, not new to the GTO. It can be broken, maybe theres some quality inspection issues, but by and large it's a successful product.. (knock on wood)

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 7th June, 2006

7th Jun 2006, 13:30

I wish they made it look less like grand am. Other than that, it's a great performance car.

7th Jun 2006, 17:38

You neglected to mention that, as a discontinued model, dealers should be quite willing to negotiate well below the sticker price of the GTO as well... you did get yours at a substantial discount...didn't you?

2006 Pontiac GTO 6.0 LS2 from North America

Model year2006
Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 6.0 LS2 Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.6 / 10
Distance when acquired30 miles
Most recent distance2000 miles
Previous carMazda 6

Summary:

Amazing power and value for money

Faults:

Check Engine light at 1500m - reset and has not appeared again.

No other faults.

General Comments:

Serious power - makes getting from A to B fun again.

Wonderfully comfortable and supportive seats - you can drive all day and still be fresh.

Interior quality much better than usual GM product - not quite like a BMW or Benz, but quality of materials and finish better then is usual domestic manufacturers. Leather is good quality, but not so shiny that you slide around in the seats. (On the other hand this car is really an import - it's built in Australia)

Ride and handling are a little bit soft for my tastes, but there are plenty of aftermarket sources for upgrades.

Appearance has good points and bad points; the good is that the car is really quite restrained in looks and doesn't have all the go-faster plastic cladding that you might expect from Pontiac - the bad is that the bit they did add (a go-faster plastic spoiler) looks like an afterthought since they didn't remove the internal high mounted brakelight.

Would have liked more factory options like, say, cell phone hook up and perhaps a sunroof, both of which are available in Aussie.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th May, 2006

5th Jun 2006, 05:22

I see a lot (well a few in the grand scheme) of people claiming the car is "junk". Yet on other sites I see everyone lauding it. I wonder if maybe this site gets hits for the problems in search engines and attracts only the people with problems. Of course one doesn't generally get all fired up to go laud something. Only complain. I have had similar problems with other transmissions like the problems described in these posts. I know what caused mine. the same thing that caused the teeth to pop off my ring gears... Heavy gas foot, light clutch foot. Slammin those gears around. I've only had mine a few days, so far so good. Of course. I'll post a real review in a month or so, after I can see what bugs it may have early. Hope you are the unlucky few (knock on wood).

The same complaints are often made of the firebirds and camaros, gt mustangs and others. Lots of torque, and maybe an tranny that should be built stronger. I find reverse easily. for now.

One question I had, the 1->4 light. SHould it be preventing me from going 1=>4 or just telling me to shift that way. I can (and have) put it in 2 with the light on.

1st Jul 2006, 10:39

The question about 1=>4... for me it feels stiff if I try to shift second, like I would have to force it into 2nd if I were to try.

So I would answer it as, it makes you shift to 4th. The thing is, the window it forces you to is very small, so you might see the light then it goes away, then you're able to shift to second and it felt like one motion, but the skip shift went away, so it was fine.

Long story short: Buy a skip shift eliminator! I think it's a only about 20 bucks. I'm going to grab one of those and a GMM Ripshifter as first mods :)

Average review marks: 7.7 / 10, based on 12 reviews