1994 SAAB 9000 Reviews

1994 SAAB 9000 CS 2.3L non-turbo from North America

Model year1994
Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2013
Engine and transmission 2.3L non-turbo Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired49000 miles
Most recent distance135000 miles
Previous carCadillac STS

Summary:

Safe, large, versatile car. Saab's best car they ever made

Faults:

Neutral safety switch worn out. Car would not stay running in drive. Replaced by dealer at 70,000 miles

Radiator developed a crack. Replaced by myself at 110,000 miles. Easy job. Happens to many cars at this mileage.

Blower motor worn out and noisy. Replaced by myself when the heater core was replaced at 125,000 miles. Nasty job. This and the heater core are problems in the 9000. However, most likely you will only do the blower motor and heater core once in the life of the car.

Heater core weeping coolant. Replaced by myself before it became a problem, along with the blower motor at the same time. 125,000 miles. Nasty job.

Rear brake calipers and hoses. Rear calipers started to seize. I rebuilt them myself at 130,000 miles. Replaced hoses at same time. Would have been easier to just replace with rebuilt calipers, which are not very expensive. But I had the time and talent, so rebuilt them myself.

Cruise control module. Cruise would not stay engaged. Known problem with 1994 model year 9000's. Replaced by myself with earlier MY module at 130,000 miles. Not too hard to do.

Emergency flasher relay. Repaired myself by reflowing solder on relay. Not hard to do.

Intermittent wiper relay. Repaired myself by reflowing solder on relay. Not hard to do.

SRS light on. Never bothered to fix. Chronic problem with 9000's. Slightest bit of resistance in the wiring harness makes the control module light up the SRS warning lamp. Will clean the wiring harness and have a friend with TechII reset.

Cylinder head retorqued at 120,000 miles. Started to get a little coolant burn off in the cylinders only on cold mornings. Retorqued the cylinder head myself according to Saab TSB. Problem solved.

Power steering rack replaced at 80,000 miles. Developed sudden massive seal leak. Power steering rack now starting to leak again slightly at 135,000 miles. Will replace myself if stop leak does not work.

Fuel pump replaced at 130,000 miles. Just stopped working on way home. Luckily only 1/2 mile from home when it happened. Replaced myself.

General Comments:

Best source of information on these cars is www.saabnet.com.

1994 was the last year for a non-turbo 9000 in the USA. With the automatic, the car is kind of slow from 0-30 mph. After that, acceleration is fine. This is my wife's car, and she really doesn't care about the acceleration.

Advantage of the non-turbo is that the car is most likely not to have been abused, there is less complexity (less to go wrong) and the engine is not stressed at all.

The car is HUGE inside. EPA classified it as a Large Car (think Ford Crown Vic, big Cadillacs, etc.).

The 4-door hatchback is the BEST! The car's carrying capacity is huge. I have transported a new furnace for my home in the back (with the seats down) and closed the hatch.

I find the car comfortable and quiet on the road. Handling is very good considering the size. Materials used in the interior seem of very high quality.

These are cars best owned by people who can do most of the work on the car by themselves. Otherwise they can become expensive if you are paying for all labor.

The car has only stranded us three times. Once when the power steering rack failed completely, and another time much later when the fuel pump died, although the fuel pump failure would be considered normal for the miles that it occurred at. The third time was when a mouse chewed a hole in the plastic fuel line at the engine. Can't fault the car for that!

Automatic transmissions in these cars can be troublesome, although we have had no problems. This is not so much a Saab issue as it is a ZF problem (ZF is the German manufacturer of the transmission). In fact many other manufacturers using this same transmission in the 1990's like Jaguar, BMW, Audi, Alfa Romeo, etc. have the same issues. The transmission is very sensitive to having clean fluid. You need to change the transmission fluid every 24,000 miles. When I bought the car, I installed a remote spin on oil filter in the return line to the transmission. This keeps the fluid perfectly clean between changes.

I updated my non-turbo with a transmission oil cooler and an engine oil cooler with thermostat from a turbo engined car.

I use only synthetic oil in the engine and change it every 5000 miles.

Even though Saab is no longer in business, parts are readily available from many sources. Parts are no more expensive than any other car.

There always seems to be something to fix on the car, although they are mostly small things that most people would probably not notice.

You need to keep the maintenance up to date and not let it lapse, or you will literally pay the price. Very similar to a BMW and Audi in that regard.

Having said all of the above, we love the car. It is incredibly safe and solid. With the rear hatch, it is very useful to have. When you drive the car, you can feel how solid it is. Best car for my wife and children to ride in.

Even though it requires more maintenance than some other brands, we intend to keep it because there really is no other car out there to replace it. Huge interior, safe design, 4-door hatchback, 4 cylinder economy, low insurance cost, etc. Because I do 95% of the work myself, it is cheaper for us to just make repairs rather than get some other car. At this point I know just about everything about this car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th February, 2013

1994 SAAB 9000 CDE 2.3 non turbo petrol from Israel

Model year1994
Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership2011
Most recent year of ownership2012
Engine and transmission 2.3 non turbo petrol Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 1 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
4.6 / 10
Distance when acquired186000 kilometres
Most recent distance194000 kilometres
Previous carSuzuki Swift

Summary:

Cheap to buy, pricey to maintain, disappointing to have

Faults:

Exhaust had corrosion, and finally developed a huge hole and needed replacement ($300).

Leak from the fuel tank, probably because it was damaged by the previous owner.

Cruise control doesn't work.

Fuel pump failed and needed replacement ($200).

Service lamp always on, nothing helped.

Auto box blew at 192000 km, didn't want to put another 2000 USD in it, so I just dumped it on some public parking.

General Comments:

The non turbo engine is very weak and unsatisfying.

The car is extremely thirsty on fuel.

Many small electrical staff does not work at all - very annoying.

This car does not fit a hot climate. I've heard many times about automatic gearbox early problems due to the hot climate.

Visiting the dealer's garage costs a fortune.

I had a Citroen once - it did more problems, but at least was comfortable. The SAAB 9000 is not very comfortable though. I didn't feel confident in the car, and always prayed not to be stuck. I'm a tall guy, and for me the driving position was a nightmare, even though it is a big car.

Very few garages will agree to take care of it and repair it.

Don't buy this car; it will take you a fortune to maintain and keep up going, but eventually you won't be pleased with it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 23rd May, 2012

24th May 2012, 09:35

Umm... Why did you buy this car??? I've owned 9 Saabs and never had issues like you have. You bought a old car that was not maintained by the previous owner, has over 190,000 miles on the car and you are complaining??? Then judge the entire Saab company on the one old junk Saab you bought??? Be reasonable. Try a NEWER Saab. Possibly a 2001, which is 11 years old, not 18 years old. THEN comment on Saab vehicles.

24th May 2012, 13:46

It's engineering like this that put Saab out of business.

25th May 2012, 08:57

That's 190k kilometers, not miles.

25th May 2012, 18:04

It seems to me it was GM that put Saab out of business.

28th May 2012, 02:12

GM actually gave Saab a few more years to live. When they bought 50% of Saab Automobile in 1990, Saab were already in danger of going under owing to several factors:

A) Dependence on too few markets to generate the majority of sales volume.

B) Too narrow a product offering.

C) Models that were too old to compete with newer offerings from their rivals.

D) Awful marketing that saw their cars appealing to too narrow a customer base.

Sadly, few, if any, of these issues were addressed under GM's stewardship.

To be fair to GM, even Ford screwed up Jaguar when they owned it.

Average review marks: 6.7 / 10, based on 10 reviews