2002 Saturn SL Reviews - Page 4 of 9

2002 Saturn SL 2 1.9L DOHC from North America

Model year2002
Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 1.9L DOHC Manual
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.2 / 10
Distance when acquired45000 miles
Most recent distance118000 miles
Previous carSaturn SL

Summary:

Decent basic transportation, but not comparable to a Honda

Faults:

Ignition module failed at approx. 93,000 miles. Repair cost was $650.

Water pump failed at approx. 95,000 miles, which I understand to be common for high mileage Saturn SL. Repair cost was $305.

The car presently has 118,000 miles, and has used about 1 quart of oil per 1000-1200 miles since it reached 100,000 miles. I assume this is a combination of minor leakage plus engine wear that would be typical for the mileage, and does not seem to be getting worse.

General Comments:

Several reviewers have commented on ignition and lock problems. This is due to the keys wearing out; an honest dealer saved me from more expensive repairs. The solution is simply to have the dealer cut new keys from code.

I had owned a base model 1998 SL and a 2001 SL1 prior to this 2002 SL2, with a few other cars in the mix. In all fairness, it's been more reliable than other American cars I have owned.

Gas mileage is excellent. I am getting 35-38 mpg. highway with the 5 speed manual, and combined city plus highway mileage is seldom much below 30 mpg.

Gearing of the 5 speed SL2 is much too short. The car is turning 3100-3200 rpm at typical interstate speeds in the low 70s. The engine is noisy and high-strung at 3100 rpm. The SL and SL1 prior to this were a little slower off the line (100 vs. 124 hp) but more relaxed at cruise speed (about 500 rpm fewer). Although the DOHC SL2 engine is a little quicker at all driving speeds, the difference is not enough to warranty the extra racket at cruising speed.

Resale value is a real weak point. While trade in values are always a challenge with dealers, this one has been especially lacking. Therefore, I'm still driving this Saturn with 118,000 miles, and it's been reliable (but it definitely had it's challenges in the 90,000-95,000 mile range).

This Saturn design dates to 1996, and wasn't as sporty or refined as the Honda Civics or VW Jettas of the same era. The much lower realistically available purchase price helped, but the lower resale value hurt when I was ready to drive a newer car and couldn't get a decent trade value.

Finally, any Saturn SL, despite the inherent limitations, is a much better design than the Ion that followed. I hope the soon-to-follow Opel designed Saturn Astra will give me reason to try another new Saturn.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 30th September, 2007

8th Oct 2007, 22:57

I too have had oil consumption problems from about 90,000 on, although my car was stolen and taken for a joy ride, so that may have had something to do with it.

And thanks to this website, I was able to bypass any dealer or mechanic and troubleshoot the "ignition" problem as nothing more than a wore down key, fixed for $4.00!!

2nd Nov 2008, 15:42

Follow up to my comments on 9/30/07. My 2002 SL2 now has 154K rather than 118K and is still chugging along, although the Service Engine Soon light came on today.

Had to replace a power window motor, about $200-$300.

Console fell apart. I located a decent console on E-Bay for $75 and installed it in 5 minutes by turning 2 screws.

Heat shield (exhaust) rattles no matter what is done to secure it.

Wheel cylinders replaced at some point.

I would not spend much to keep this car going, but I'll drive it until that day comes. Certainly I got my money's worth, but not completely trouble-free along the way.

Unless you are looking to do serious modifications, as I mentioned before - the SL1 is the much more relaxed, quieter daily commuter.

2002 Saturn SL SL2 from North America

Model year2002
Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.2 / 10
Distance when acquired50 miles
Most recent distance56000 miles
Previous carChevrolet Lumina

Summary:

This car is a great value!

Faults:

Gas gauge is inaccurate. I have to watch miles to refill. (No biggie)

General Comments:

I was at the end of my rope with the lemon I had. I called Saturn to look at what they had on the lot that was inexpensive. The salesman was great and offered me a great deal. I hate buying new cars and this was as painless as advertised. The price was fair and the sale was easy. No haggling or waiting for him to "check with the manager". I bought the car the same day.

I have had no problems at all with this car - just the usual wear and tear. A belt replacement here and there. The car died on me once at the 5-year mark because the battery was gone. It was the original battery!

Love, love, love this car. Economical, reliable and easy to drive.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 5th August, 2007

Average review marks: 7.1 / 10, based on 28 reviews