22nd Jan 2006, 09:55
This is not important though.
The car has been called "Jimny" in the country where it is from, Japan. There is a category called "KEI" which allowed to have the engine capacity of 660cc (only) but it can have turbo (generating almost same top end power). The category used to allow 360cc then go up to 550cc.
The car has been designed for the category.
1300cc model is also there in Japan, called "Jimny Sierra".
It share the some body.
In Australia, this is where I live, there is no 660cc model.
1300cc model has been called "Sierra" but new model is called "Jimny".
Also Vitara is called "ESCUDO" in Japan.
So it's a bit complicated for me.
See!! This is not important.
27th Oct 2006, 02:37
Chris, do you still have your Jimny and how's it performing? Is the handling as bad as they say and how does the car perform on the motorway? I drive mostly in towm with the occasional motorway journey so what's your view on this from an owners perspective? The Jimny appeals to me due to it's size, reliability and seem cheap to buy, even new - all opinions and views much appreciated - Dean.
30th Jan 2007, 01:49
Because of possible litigation, Suzuki USA will not do this.
This is due to America being the capital of the world compensation culture, and a car that is very likely to roll over poses too much of a risk of compensation compared to a possible profit.
I do agree with you that a pure Suzuki product sourced from the Japanese factory is a way superior product than the other products Suzuki currently offer..

14th Sep 2005, 23:32
I would highly agree. I would love something like an updated, newer model of the Suzuki Samurai (Jimny outside the U.S.) with coil suspension, ABS and dual airbags, not to mention newer thus more reliable. Suzuki, please hear our cries!!!
Nick D.
Flagstaff, AZ U.S.A.