2002 Toyota Sienna Reviews

2002 Toyota Sienna Symphony 3.0 from North America

Model year2002
Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 3.0 Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.0 / 10
Distance when acquired75 miles
Most recent distance135000 miles
Previous carChrysler Grand Caravan

Summary:

Very reliable and functional transportation

Faults:

Nothing.

General Comments:

Best vehicle we've every owned.

We are original owners (9+ years).

We also own a 2002 Honda Odyssey; the Toyota is better quality.

Other than basic maintenance, all is original!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th July, 2011

2002 Toyota Sienna LE 3.0 V6 from North America

Model year2002
Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 3.0 V6 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.8 / 10
Distance when acquired10 miles
Most recent distance92000 miles
Previous carChevrolet Astro

Summary:

No regrets. Best vehicle I ever owned!

Faults:

Nothing major.

1. Front brakes became severely warped and had to be replaced at 80k miles.

2. Passenger side sliding door is hard to open sometimes. You have to yank on it to open.

3. Antenna went bad about 85k miles. Dealer wanted twice as much as the stereo shop who fixed it.

4. Pings real good at certain rpm's because I use regular grade gas. It was a bad idea to engineer it for premium in the first place.

5. Went through four windshields. We really only use this vehicle for roadtrips and trips longer than 40-50 miles.

Can't remember anything else, just regular things at the service intervals.

General Comments:

After reading some of the other reviews of the Sienna I consider myself lucky. A lot of folks have had misfortune with these and I am happy to say that I am not one of them. In fact, I had no idea about the sludge problems with these things until about a month ago. I never received a letter from Toyota or anything.

I bought this van brand new from a friend who is a salesman at a local Toyota dealership in August of 2001 as a 2002 model. It was the first and only new vehicle I have ever bought, and only did so as he gave me a good deal (about 3k under sticker, yes it was that good). So I guess that I did not experience the pain-in-the-ass dealership experience a lot of people seem to complain about here.

92,000 miles later I still have not had a single problem with this van. Never left us stranded or anything. Up to this point it is the most reliable vehicle I have ever owned. And I have owned mostly toyotas throughout my 40 years of driving.

This is NOT WELL MAINTAINED. It has been neglected in terms of regular maintenence. The last oil change we got for it was after 7,000 since the previous one and most of them are every 5,000 or more. We only use the low grade 10w-30 stuff and the normal filter. We have only gotten a tune up twice and not from the dealer (although it could use one now). We rarely clean it either. We wait until it gets real gross inside or out to clean it.

Our previous van was a 1992 Chevy Astro AWD Shorty. It was reliable and lasted us 200k miles, but had more problems than the Sienna did at almost 100k miles. It was a good van, but it just kept on nickel and diming us to the point were we sold it and bought the Sienna. Just one thing after another past the first 85k. Chevy's don't tend to age as gracefully as Toyota's do (seems like as soon as the warranty goes out all the problems start to happen). The front seats in the astro were way more comfortable than the Sienna. The Astro had AWD and got terrible gas mileage, but was very good in the snow. I can't say the same about the Sienna, doesn't seem to do so well. Luckly we only see snow less than five days a year. The sienna is so much smoother, quieter, faster, and handles way better than the astro ever could. Kind of unfair to compare the two, but it helps show how much improved this is over the chevy. The Sienna is just so very well built, the quality is excellent. Quite unlike caravans or ventures or windstars of the same year (pieces of crap)

Bottom Line: No matter what we do or don't do to it, it keeps on keepin on and never gives us a moments trouble. I guess we just got lucky, unlike a lot of other Sienna owners did. I expect this to last for a very long time.

I've never gone wrong with a Toyota, and I doubt I ever will.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th June, 2007

Average review marks: 8.3 / 10, based on 4 reviews