14th Nov 2005, 02:47
I've only had my 1994 Cavalier V6 auto for about a month, but I am very impressed with it. Performance with the sports auto box is exceptional. I replaced the cam belt as there was no evidence of a recent change, cost about £200; it would have gone on, but I needed the peace of mind.
I've driven, and still do 24v Senators, but there is no real difference in the performance. The trouble is Senators, which I like, are beginning to rust away, but the Cavalier V6 seem to be better rust proofed.
In all a good car, which will impress any driver competent enough to form their own opinions.
20th Nov 2008, 17:46
Indeed, keep your Cav V6 and do not get the Vectra V6 (1995 - 1999). I did and regretted it. It's a handsome beast to look at, but my 1998 Vectra 2.5 V6 Sport died the day I bought it from a guy who was selling it on Ebay - I think I was conned!
The Vectra is an unreliable dog of a car - read its reviews (95 - 99) on this site - I wish I did before buying mine.
I did not have time to sell my old Cavalier 1.8 before the Vectra went for a burden - the oil pump failed I believe at high speed, and this wrecked the top end and camshafts - Ouch! bye bye engine!
So I am keeping my Cav now a bit longer - it's slow, yes, but at least it keeps going. It's 14 years old next month and still drives a treat. Losing all my money on that wretched Vectra has taught me one thing - when the Cav finally dies - I will never buy a Vauxhall again, ever.

9th Dec 2004, 06:19
I agree I had a cavalier V6 and only had a few problems. The problems were simple things such as small sensors like the ABS sensor, but this was easy to fix - a couple of quid second hand. I now have a Vectra v6 and this is a problem... The cavalier was much more reliable and cheaper to run, with more pace and not all the electrical gremlins which come with newer cars such as the Vectra.