1991 Chevrolet Corsica LT from North America - Comments

16th Dec 2002, 22:15

"Beautiful"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Suspension Problem Unfix-able After.

Accident (Extremely Negative Camber)

3 Bad Alternators.

Seat back tearing from excessive sun exposure.

General comments?

This is my favorite car in the world... many people ask me why I have this car... I tell them its because it is unique... unlike any other car.

More powerful than any other 4-door sedan that I know of... (even BRAND NEW cars)... I Also own a 2002 35th Anniversary SS Camaro, so you can see why people question me owning this car. I highly recommend this car to anyone looking for a good car to get them around... as long as it is from 1991 - 1996 This is an excellent Car!


3rd Mar 2003, 19:48

I beg to differ about the 1991 to 1996 Corsica's because I have a 1989 Corsica with 125,000 miles, and it is A lot better than any Corsica they have made, not to mention it has the best motor, a 2.8 multi-port engine (which is a 6 cylinder) and it will stomp the hell out of any of the 4 cylinders and the 3.1 6 cylinder engines! Trust me, I have raced many many 4 cylinders and 3.1's, neither have yet even came close to beating the mighty 2.8!!

Vote:

17th Jun 2003, 20:53

I own a 1991 with the 3.1 and I would beg to differ with you it will flat out put a 2.8 to shame done and been there.

Vote:

23rd Jan 2004, 12:53

Guys...the 2.8 V-6 and the 3.1 V-6 are the same engine... a 3.1 is simply a larger 2.8. As such, a 3.1 will usually be stronger than a 2.8; by about 15-28 horsepower (the 3.1 has 140 hp; whereas a 2.8 has anywhere from 112 to 125 horsepower). You're arguing about the same engine!

Vote:

18th Sep 2004, 17:12

The 2.8 and 3.1 are the same engine, they are both 60 degree V6 engines, the 3.1 will outperform the 2.8, no questions about that. I had an 88 2.8 and now have a 90 3.1, I've put $5,000 into the 2.8 and it would roast the tires, should I now put $5,000 into the 3.1 it will roast a bit better. The three things that you need to have more of to win a race is: More TORQUE (not H.P.), more traction and more cubic inches. The 3.1 has the most torque and more cubic inches, sorry 2.8's it's physics!

Vote:

8th Sep 2005, 17:29

You are both wrong! I have a 93 ALTIMA it's a 2.4L 4Cyl DOHC 16V 150HP Engine 0-60 in 8.30 seconds, hands down will pass all cars, trucks, I know I had car up to 145 MPH

car not governor controlled

out ran a 94 camaro 3.4L 160HP engine.

Mileage on Altima 161,000 miles.

Not the cars falt that there are slow, just made that way.

Vote:

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Chevrolet Corsica reviews