27th May 2014, 08:09

Yeah, I guess you're right. I see TONS of 68-74 Omegas on the road; that must be why they are not rare.

27th May 2014, 16:29

The number of doors really makes that much of a difference in comparison?? Please.

Both cars, whether from the 60's or 90's, were body on frame, rear-drive, V8, high performance, full-size cars. The only thing missing in the 94-96 is a manual trans. Sure there is no comparison in the last generation Impala SS. That would be because they were V6, front-drive and unibody.

By the way, the Olds Omega is a rare car; how many do you see today from all three generations (1968-1985)?