1995 Volvo 960 review from North America
"1st car that has made me not miss my 164s; that says a lot"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Steering rack.
Rear axle.
Stabilizer link bushings.
A/C.
Headlight wiper motor.
Dash lights.
Sunroof leak.
Hoses.
Belt.
Auto gearshift assembly.
Door leather separation.
Alignment.
Passenger seat switch assembly.
Numerous other items.
General comments?
I bought the car after spying it at a used car dealer. I had Volvo check it out before purchasing, and they gave me a long laundry list of items that needed repair, and their comment was that there was no rust, and other than the dealer's disclosure of an accident, the car showed no signs of it.
The dealer felt the car, like many Volvos, was on the fence as to purchasing, as it had not been maintained as it should, resulting in a long list of items needed. The engine and transmission were strong. So much of the work done was neither a surprise, nor a result of my ownership.
When I got it on the road, the suspension was far noisier than my 1995 940, but the dealership kept saying there was nothing wrong with it. A rear axle let go and had to be replaced. They also said the stabilizer link bushings in the front were worn, so I had them replaced. Picked the car up, and the noise is gone, and the car rides and steers better. I suspect they may have done some other things without charging, as I had continually complained to them about it.
Still remaining to be done are the sunroof leak, new less aggressive tires, and an air guide that needs replacement. The car came with wheels that were offset incorrectly and caused rubbing of the tires on the fender wells. Had to locate 4 OEM wheels, which I did at a couple of salvage yards at less cost than new ones from Volvo. Volvo only seems to offer replacement sunroofs and does not supply gaskets. I've located a shop that does repair sunroofs, and they do a good number of Volvo sunroofs. Their experience is it is usually an alignment issue, rather than a gasket or seal.
I've owned the car for just over a year, and did not drive it during the winter. I do not put many kilometers on either Volvo annually so the per kilometer cost has been high, but I'd rather maintain these last rear wheel drive cars than make payments on the newer FWD models that just do not feel like Volvos.
I've been a Volvo owner since about '71, starting with a P1800 and having had 3 164s (my favorite Volvo), 240s, 144s, 760, 264 and several others. I am hoping these 2 last RWD models will get me through the last years of my driving life.
My wife loved her 164, and though she'd like a bit more power, prefers the 940 over the 960, as it seems to suit her disposition better; practical, stable, no nonsense, just reliable and gets the job done. The 960, though a dressed up 940 with a larger engine, feels and handles very differently. Between the 2, I cannot say with certainty which I prefer.
The seats are great, the steering wheel well placed, very comfortable to drive. It is a car that begs you to sit in it, feel the steering wheel, listen to the engine and find an excuse to go somewhere. Last car I had like this was my 164.
Recommended reviews
![]() ![]() | A reliable, efficient car, albeit expensive to maintain |
![]() ![]() | How do you keep a Volvo running? Throw a few thousand dollars at it every 100,000 miles! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Model Year | 1995 |
| First year of ownership | 2006 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2007 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7/10 |
| Reliability marks | 7/10 |
| Comfort marks | 9/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 3/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 214000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 217000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Volvo 940 |
| Date of Entry | 7th July, 2007 |




