1995 Volvo 960 Reviews - Page 4 of 4

I don't know about post 85 Volvo's being suspect...

I would say Volvo's reliability peaked in 1988-90 with it's 740/760 models.

Those years are super reliable as are most 1985-92 240 series.

I do agree, however, that Volvo's quality continued to drop from 1990 to 2001 or so. The 2000 S40 is the biggest hunk of junk they've ever made.

It pays to research the good years and pick a known winner!

I personally recommend the 89/90 760 GLE...reliable luxury at agreat price.

I don't think Volvo quality started to go down until they started venturing away from the 4cyl. rear-wheel drive models like 240, 740/760, and 940. The 960 came out in '92 and was just a more luxurious version of the 940 with a failure prone 6cyl. engine and electronic transmission. Then the 850 came out in '93 with all of its electrical and build quality shortcomings. Then Ford bought Volvo and quality took a plunge starting with the new or redesigned '98 models. The general rule of thumb I've learned over the years about Volvos, if it's got a 4cyl. and is rear-wheel drive, it's a great Volvo! I'm talking from having experience with an '85 240DL, an '89 740 Turbo, and '95 940. All extremely dependable cars that lasted a very long time.

The Volvo 960 porous engine block problem is well documented in these links:

http://www.volvoclub.org.uk/faq/960_90Info.html#Porous960B6304Blocks

http://www.swedishbricks.net/700900FAQ/BuyingUsed7xx1.html

Watch for missing coolant that leaks through pinholes into exhaust. A very expensive fix. Best bet is to stay clear of Volvo's 2.9L inline six and the 960.

We have had our 960 for quite a number of years now.

Although the service seems expensive, the dealer always tries do their best and gives my wife a car to use, even though it is well out of warranty.

Because of the lack of problems with this car, my wife and I swear by them and bought two more Volvo's. A XC70 Cross Country and a S80 T6.

The 960 pulls very strong. It gets an average 27.5mpg on the road at 70+ with 91 octane, 24 with 87. We drove it across the country with our two children and it was smooth and quiet. The trunk is roomy enough for all 4 of us.

The front springs started to sag a little at 125,000 miles which is lead to resetting the alignment.

Volvo should never have stopped making it. I prefer the rear wheel drive, even if we had to buy Blizzak tires for the winter. It is awful in the snow without them.

The brakes have lasted longer than any car we have owned in the last 30 years.

I think that those that complain about a 960 have not taken time to appreciate what it really is. It requires very little maintenance.

I have run Mobil 1 since getting the car, and change it at 10,000 miles just as the indicator recommends. I don't cheat on parts. I buy the best I can get. Cars are too expensive to cheat on the small stuff.