2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS review from North America
"Fast and beautiful!!!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I have had no problems at all. I have owned a 1996 a 1999 and now a 2002.ALL have had no real problems. ANYONE that has had problems most likely was abuse or neglect on there part.
General comments?
OVERALL I believe that GM has the handle on these cars. VERY nicely designed for function and comfort. HAS more power and options then you would expect from higher priced autos.
Recommended Reviews:
![]() ![]() | Love it and will keep it! |
![]() ![]() | 2000 - Monte Carlo SS 3.8 Liter V6 A rocket for the money, almost more fun than previous Camaro |
All 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.4 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 10/10 |
| Reliability marks | 10/10 |
| Comfort marks | 10/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 8 miles |
| Most recent distance | 2500 miles |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Monte Carlo |
| Date of Entry | 24th May, 2002 |

