2010 Honda Civic LX-S 1.8

Summary:

Reliable, efficent, but suspension problems

Faults:

Shock absorber performance.

General Comments:

Since I've put 107,000 miles trouble free on this car, it's hard to not to give it a happy face.

The one complaint I have is the suspension. The car is now 4 years old, and I have done 95% highway mileage. The car feels like it has no shock absorbers left; going over small bumps or potholes causes a bone jarring sound and feeling. If I have any added weight of passengers in the car, it's worse, and it's really painful.

Cabin noise as always is high in the Civic. I have a 1998, and two 2004's as well, and they are all loud in the cabin, but only the 2010 has the shock absorber issue.

Otherwise this car is unbelievable in terms of gas efficiency (39 MPG) and reliability.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 29th January, 2014

29th Jan 2014, 16:19

Shocks are a wear-out item... on most cars they last a little longer, sure, but they're definitely cheap and easy to replace. Put some aftermarket Monroes on there or something similar, and it may last longer than the stock Honda shocks did.

22nd May 2014, 10:46

I have never changed the shocks on my 98, and they're still great. This car was driven to Brooklyn and back to Manalapan, NJ daily by my wife for several years, so it had the shiznit beat out of it. Same with the 2004. My 2010 on the other hand is 95% highway miles, and the shocks are shot. So, that's why I'm disappointed.

22nd Sep 2014, 15:30

It is very probable Honda used cheaper shock absorbers this time. My recommendation is to go with a good aftermarket standard stiffness parts such as Kyb for example (check out on forums) that will surely last past 100k miles.

22nd Sep 2014, 15:31

Also check the control arm bushings.

2010 Honda Civic Hybrid 1.3 hybrid

Summary:

Smooth, like riding in an airplane

Faults:

No maintenance issues. The car still is tight.

General Comments:

Great gas mileage - an average of 44 MPG combined.

All hybrids are different. In this one, an electric motor assists the gas engine on hills or acceleration, but is not on all the time. A different system than the Prius.

The car is roomy with lots of gauges to distract your eyes from the road.

Easy maintenance. An oil minder tells you the life of your oil, and when to change it.

Have seen several of these cars over 200,000 miles.

Would not buy one older than 2007. Software problems. Battery will last the life of the car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 16th April, 2013

25th Jan 2014, 03:05

Hybrid battery done at 65000 miles. Honda replaced it with upgraded lithium ion battery and gave a 10 year 150000 mile warranty no charge. Let's see Chevy or Ford back their products up like that.

2010 Honda Civic EX 1.8

Summary:

Frustrated

Faults:

The reason I'm writing this review is I got out of work and started the car. The check engine light was on, and the car shifted very erratically. I pulled the code p0962, some kind of shift solenoid for the transmission. Drove it to the dealer after just 2400 miles since purchase. Hopefully they honor the certified used warranty.

General Comments:

Great fuel economy (31 MPG city).

Easy maintenance DIY (oil, tranny fluid, brakes).

Kind of sluggish.

I like the liner in the trunk.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 3rd July, 2012

3rd Jul 2012, 15:15

Well, I'd keep quiet about the DIY maintenance if you expect warranty service...

31st Jan 2015, 11:39

About 3 years later, the car has 55k miles now, still going strong. After the initial quirks I'm very happy with this car.

28th Oct 2015, 00:31

Just make sure to save all receipts and write down mileage, so not to void any warranties for DIY jobs.

2010 Honda Civic LX 4DR 1.8 SOHC

Summary:

Solid economy sedan

Faults:

Nothing.

General Comments:

I traded in my 2008/9 Focus AT/SES for this Civic, as it was on a 6 year finance deal, and I was about to be really upside down on the loan.

I didn't hate the Focus, but I did have some issues with it, such as the less than spectacular handling feel and the poorly spaced transmission ratios, and thankfully the Civic succeeded on improving both areas.

This little car feels quite nimble in the turns, and while it doesn't handle quite as well as my Milan that I had earlier, it's definitely a taut-er feel than the cushy Focus. This is with 16" steel wheels and A/S tires.

The transmission benefits from having an extra gear (5 speed auto vs. 4 speed), but unfortunately, as it seems is being done with most automatics nowadays to get CAFE points, the overdrive gear is simply too tall for the car, and unlike the Focus, there is no way to lock out 5th gear on the highway. Sure, you *could* put it in D3, but the engine is turning around 3800rpm at 55mph in 3rd, so that's not much of a solution.

As such, the little 1.8 is turning about 2050rpm @ 65mph in 5th, which means even moderate highway grades cause the annoying 5-4 shift just to maintain speed, or at best, a shift out of lockup. I suppose this is great if you live in a flat, open area, as it will allow you to cruise at high speeds without noise, but here in the Northeast US, it's just annoying.

Otherwise, the acceleration gears (1-3) are very well staged to make the small engine feel peppy, and around town, I can't say I really lust for more power. Engine pulls very nicely to the redline, downshifts are generally smooth.

Seats are much more supportive than the Focus, and I didn't find the two-level speedo/tach to be much of an adjustment at all. The radio in my LX though, is pretty awful --- the CD player refuses to read my mp3 discs, and the sound quality is pretty poor. Muddy bass and poor stereo imaging abound.

As for fit and finish, I don't get why the Honda gets brilliant marks from that certain consumer magazine, and the Focus gets trashed for it --- I really didn't notice any significant difference between the two in regards to trim and build quality. If anything, the Focus interior was more interesting and less drab (higher trim level (SES vs LX) of course, but they ended up being around the same price).

Overall, a good car with a couple of annoying issues.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 23rd March, 2011

18th Jun 2012, 11:13

Thanks for giving a very fair and balanced review. The Civic is still an excellent car, but it is no longer way out front of other brands for quality or performance. I will consider one for my next car, along with a few others, including domestics.

2010 Honda Civic Si

Summary:

Get back to being a Civic, and stop trying to be a weird sports car

General Comments:

I am reviewing my friends new car, which I drove this past week. Obviously I don't have any information about reliability, given it is a brand new car and has no issues. His car is a two door model.

Pros:

Pretty fun to drive.

Very responsive handling, and nice and easy to park.

Good on fuel.

Fairly quiet on the highway.

Cons:

Looks SUPER lame. I mean, the 4 door model looks passably decent, but the two door is embarrassing to drive.

Bad stock stereo for a car this expensive.

The back seat has room for an overnight bag and a premature newborn. I wouldn't consider this car anything other than a roadster (the two door model that is).

$$$ - the car is way overpriced compared to comparable domestics. I expect to pay more for an import, but not like 50% more.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 10th August, 2010

1st Oct 2010, 01:12

+1 good review.

I bought mine used 2 years old and saved about 8000+. It only had 27000kms on it. For a new car, definitely not worth it. Although I don't think it gets the greatest gas mileage! Even highway, the best I get is 26mpg. My friend's new '11 V6 Stang gets that, and has 2 more cyls and 108 more hp.