Buick Lucerne Reviews - Page 2 of 3

2011 Buick Lucerne CXL Premium 3.9 from North America

Model year2011
Year of manufacture2010
First year of ownership2011
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 3.9 Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.2 / 10
Distance when acquired70 miles
Most recent distance2700 miles
Previous carBuick Park Avenue

Summary:

An OK near luxury sedan

Faults:

I have not had any mechanical problems with the car, however it did have two defects in the paint from the factory. There were small bumps that were caused by dirt in the paint on the gas tank door, and on the rocker panel at the front corner of the front passenger door. There was also a drip in the clear coat on the trunk deck edge.

The automatic lights also weren't as sensitive as I felt they should be, so I popped the plastic cover off the sensor and applied a piece of darkened Scotch Tape over the solar panel, and now they work much better, plus you can't even tell I modified it.

General Comments:

This is the first car that I purchased brand new. I just assumed that I didn't have to look the car over like one would when buying a previously owned car. Well lesson learned; had I discovered the above mentioned paint issues, I would have never purchased the car unless the defects were repaired to my satisfaction before buying it. I had to have it painted 3 times before it was acceptable; there is still a faint run line on the tank door, but at least it matches now (it is White Diamond Tricoat, which apparently is fairly hard to match). I didn't have to pay a dime, but it was a real headache, and pretty much ruined the new car buying experience for me.

The car is a fine near luxury model, however I do regret trading my Park Avenue for this. I have had it for about 6 months now, and I still miss my old car. I was never crazy about this model, but had convinced myself I needed a new car, and rationalized that the Enclave that I really wanted was too expensive, and not practical for me. Well now I am kicking myself. I will hopefully end up selling this next year, and leasing an Enclave.

Don't get me wrong, it's not all bad. The ride, while not floaty soft like in my Park Avenues, is pretty comfortable, I also like the split bench seat (I for one will miss this configuration), I like the styling from the front, however the rear quarter does nothing for me.

A few options I like that my old car didn't have, are headlamps that come on with the windshield wipers, and cornering lamps that come on when the steering wheel is turned (kind of like the new articulating headlamps).

One option that is sorely missed that my Park Avenues had is the RainSense wipers. I loved this feature, and was shocked to find it was deleted from most GM models in the last few years!

I also think the layout for the displays is less user friendly. In my Park Avenues, the outside temp was largely displayed on the climate control, the compass was in the rear view mirror, and the time was very large and legible (designed for elderly eyes). Now the compass and outside temp are crammed in the small space below the speedometer where the DIC display is also located. In my opinion, it is too much displayed, too small, in one place. The corporate GM radio also has too much info constantly running across the screen and the time seems to blend in with it all.

I am really puzzled why GM replaced the Park Avenue with this model; the Park Avenue was just soo much better. My 2005 Park Avenue had an MSRP of over $42,000, this car stickered at $38,600. I would have gladly paid $10,000 more for a brand new Park Avenue.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 11th November, 2011

13th Nov 2011, 20:56

The 3800 was a great motor; how does the 3.9 compare to it as far as performance and smooth acceleration?

15th Nov 2011, 13:36

I find the performance to be about the same as with the 3.8. With this type of car, it's not like I'm going to be drag racing it. Both have very adequate passing power for a larger car.

One thing that I have noticed is the fuel economy is not nearly as good with the 3.9. I was averaging over 22 mpg with my Park Avenue, driving the same route that I'm averaging about 18 with the Lucerne. The Lucerne only has about 2,900 miles on it, so it might get better??

17th Feb 2012, 21:38

I've read all over that the 3900 engine doesn't get very good gas mileage, especially compared to the 3800 it supposedly replaced (particularly in this model (of which the 3800 was a Buick engine, while the 3900 was a Chevy engine!)). I don't care for the 3900 "modern" engine (which only lasted a few years' production), but dearly loved the 3800, which was in production for DECADES. Nothing beats the 3800.

19th Feb 2012, 12:43

You are very right. I had 2 Park Avenues with the Series II 3.8 before this Lucerne, and could get over 30 mpg on the highway.

My last Park Avenue was averaging about 22 mpg on my commute (mostly city driving) when I traded it in. My Lucerne is currently averaging 17.2.

I am very disappointed in this car in so many ways. Shame on Buick for replacing the Park Avenue with this model. I plan to sell it in a few months and get an Enclave. I hope I won't be so sorry with that purchase. If that is a disappointment, I probably won't be buying any more Buicks.

28th Mar 2012, 19:24

Well I traded the Lucerne tonight for a brand new Buick Enclave. I think I am going to be very happy with this decision, and don't regret it at all like I did when I traded my Park Avenue. I wish I had just went with the Enclave from the beginning. I will post a review after I have put some miles on it.

2006 Buick Lucerne CXL V6 from North America

Model year2006
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission V6 Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.5 / 10
Distance when acquired11000 miles
Most recent distance33000 miles
Previous carPontiac Grand Am

Summary:

I only wish I could afford another

Faults:

The Continental tires that came with the car were absolute rubbish. At 13K, the right-front tire fell apart, and all four continually leaked air. Also, the slightest hint of rain or snow caused them to lose any semblance of traction.

General Comments:

If I hadn't destroyed the car in an accident that my insurance wouldn't pay for (road ice), I wouldn't even think about buying another vehicle for the foreseeable future. And despite going head-first into a concrete highway median at 50 mph, spinning 180° and ramming into it backwards, completely knocking both the front and back ends off, *I* was completely unharmed (the car itself was not so lucky). The body of the car took all of the damage.

Before that, however, the car was an absolute joy to drive. The leather seats (heated!) were comfortable and fully-adjustable, and the ride was very smooth.

The only real complaint (besides the tires, which I was just too cheap to replace) was the fuel economy. I never got better than 19 mpg, even on the highway.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th February, 2011

19th Feb 2012, 12:54

I am also very disappointed in the fuel economy of my Lucerne. I traded a Park Avenue that was averaging over 22 mpg mostly city driving, my Lucerne is currently getting 17.2 and it has dropped to below 17 before. When I was driving on the highway a lot, my Park Avenue was getting over 27 mpg mixed driving.

Way to go GM, at this rate, all we will be able to drive is golf carts, in order for you to meet the CAFE standards.

Average review marks: 8.8 / 10, based on 6 reviews