1997 Cadillac DeVille Reviews - Page 5 of 6

1997 Cadillac DeVille from North America

Model year1997
Year of manufacture1997
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission Don't Know
Distance when acquired54000 miles
Most recent distance132000 miles
Previous carCadillac DeVille

Summary:

The most comfortable riding car in the world

Faults:

The head gasket blew at 131000. We replaced the water pump at that time, along with all new hoses and belts.

Now 1000 miles later we thought the starter went, but we replaced the starter. It still is not working. They think it might be a relay or a censer.

General Comments:

Car looks and runs great other than the above.

Has anyone had this problem and know how to fix it?

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th October, 2004

1997 Cadillac DeVille Northstar from North America

Year of manufacture1997
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission Northstar Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired100000 miles
Most recent distance104000 miles

Summary:

Great car, with the smoothest ride ever

Faults:

Had to replace the anti-theif VATS system (the little resistor chip in the keys), which was about $300 at the dealer. Or you can bypass it somehow.

Needs a new water pump, because of slight coolant leak. Still to be done, should be about $800 at the dealer.

Has a very slight oil leak. Just a drop hear and there. Not going to fix it.

General Comments:

I love this car. This is my first car, and I plan to only buy Cadillacs from now on. Out of all the Cadillac Devilles/Fleetwoods, I like the body style of the 94-99s best. Car handles great, and has good performance.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 25th June, 2004

1997 Cadillac DeVille Sedan de Ville 4.6 liter V8 from North America

Year of manufacture1997
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 4.6 liter V8 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
4.6 / 10
Distance when acquired89000 miles
Most recent distance94600 miles
Previous carChevrolet Blazer

Summary:

Motor stinks!

Faults:

Uses 1 quart of oil per 678 miles and the dealer won't honor the service contract.

General Comments:

I purchased my 1997 Cadillac Sedan De Ville with 89K+ miles a few months ago. It now has 94K+ miles and it if it wasn’t for the high oil consumption, it would be a great car. But it does have a major oil consumption problem and that has just ruined my experience of buying a car I thought was really special. Cadillac has put all their money into commercials, not cars.

After buying my 97 Cadillac I drove it normally and then 3-4 weeks after the purchase, the ‘check engine oil’ warning came on. It had just been serviced at the dealer! I checked and found it to be over two quarts low. The car had been a one owner purchased at the Salem, Oregon Cadillac dealer and serviced there regularly according to the salesman so they must have known about it’s problems. A week or so later I had the car serviced (lube, oil, filter, etc.) and put in Valvoline 10-30. I’ve always had a lot of faith in Valvoline. A couple days later I went back to the dealer’s service department and started getting the ‘oh, you’ll have to let us do an oil consumption test’…we can’t take your word or anyone elses….blah blah blah.

So I said, ‘OK, do it. Change the oil and start your test’ and they did. At 90,334 miles they started the test. At a week or two later they added ½ quart (looked lower than that to me, but it’s their test). At 92,281 they added 1 ¾ quarts. At 93,390 they added 1 ¾ quarts again. The last (4th) check was at 94,579 and they added 2 ¼ quarts. That’s 6 ¼ quarts of oil in 4242 miles. Looked at another way, that’s 678.72 miles per quart of oil. Basically the car is in town and freeway (I-5) driven to and from work 70 miles each week day.

I asked what were they going to do about it and was told they could do the ring decarbonizing for $500 (I pay, not covered in the extended service contract) or they could tear down the engine (15 hours just to take it apart) and if something was BROKE, the 24 month/24,000 miles service contract would pay. But if it was WARE (worn out) that caused the oil loss, I would have to pay! As they service manager representative explained, that is $1500 just to tear the motor apart to find out what is wrong. What would you do?

The service contract states ….

“Coverage is limited to the parts described below for the plan selected on the schedule…..” (24 month, 24,000 miles)

“Engine---All internal lubricated parts; manifolds; expansion plugs: harmonic balancer; pulleys, engine mounts; oil pan, rotary engine rotor housing; supercharger/turbocharger (factory installed) housing, internal parts, vanes: timing belt/chain and tensioner; timing chain cover; valve cover (s) ; water pump; seals and gaskets within component group. Cases, housings, engine block and cylinder heads are covered only if damaged by the failure of an internally lubricated part.”

That’s what it says and my car that I bought with a 24month/24,000 miles extended service contract the dealer sold me at 89,000 plus miles uses more oil than any car or truck I’ve owned since 1969. And the 4.6 liter Cadillac V-8 isn’t going to get fixed because the Chevy/Cadillac dealer and the service contract they sold to me for $1997.00 isn’t worth a damn!

I really have had good luck with the 83 Firebird, 94 Blazer, 90 Chevy S-10, 96 Chevy S-10 and one or two others. Their V-6 engines held up great and used very little if any oil. But this Northstar V-8 4.6 liter is a the worst oil burning engine I’ve ever seen or heard of since my 1964 Ford Galaxy 390. And that’s General Motors premier top of the line engine!!! Damn, I really like the car! But the engine is horrible. It doesn’t leak the oil, it burns it out the exhaust pipes.

Terry.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 25th November, 2003

26th Nov 2003, 12:41

The oil consumption you describe sounds within "normal" limits. Most car manufacturers state that up to 1000 miles per litre is OK.

6th Dec 2003, 14:42

You've got to be kidding. "Normal" my foot. This isn't the 1970s. Your expectations are way too low, for any car, let alone a top dollar luxury car!

Average review marks: 6.9 / 10, based on 19 reviews