Chery QQ Reviews - Page 2 of 2

2009 Chery QQ 311 11000 from Philippines

Year of manufacture2009
First year of ownership2009
Most recent year of ownership2009
Engine and transmission 11000 Manual
Performance marks 1 / 10
Reliability marks 2 / 10
Comfort marks 2 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 0 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
1.0 / 10
Distance when acquired5 kilometres
Most recent distance10000 kilometres
Previous carToyota Vios

Summary:

Lemon

Faults:

Spare tire holder had to be welded.

Air con was not cooling very well.

Fuel consumption was and still at 10km/liter.

Factory provided radio cannot pick up any stations.

Headlights have scratches from the inside, although they argued that it had scratches in front. So, how come it is still sealed and there are scratches inside?

Tried to return or at least have the unit changed within one month of purchase, but to no avail.

General Comments:

The car is not living to its promise of a fuel efficient vehicle.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 26th October, 2009

11th Mar 2010, 00:10

This car is relatively new. I have seen other reviews from users in different parts of the world. I got interested since they are trying to introduce this car in Kenya.

The reviews talk of a fuel efficiency of up to 15km/l. Now I think that is too low for 1000cc or less, type of car considering that there are bigger engine cars by Toyota, Peugeot, Ford, etc that can do the same or even better.

Am not convinced that it is fuel efficient. In actual fact I cannot buy a 1000cc car for that kind of fuel efficiency and compromise engine size and power. No, not me.

2009 Chery QQ from Egypt

Model year2009
Year of manufacture2009
First year of ownership2009
Most recent year of ownership2009
Engine and transmission Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance4500 kilometres
Previous carChery QQ

Summary:

Great deal

Faults:

I need more space, it's perfect for a small family, but it's too small for a big family.

General Comments:

I think the car is good, it has a lot of options; power steering, air conditioning, central locking, 4 power windows, at a good price.

The after sales service is great, friendly.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th April, 2009

2006 Chery QQ S10 0.8 from Jordan

Model year2007
Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 0.8 Manual
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 4 / 10
Comfort marks 3 / 10
Dealer Service marks 1 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
3.3 / 10
Distance when acquired230 kilometres
Most recent distance15000 kilometres

Faults:

The electric windows are trash, the A/C kills the car and you have to put your foot down to the max to keep it running.

After 3 months the doors started to squeak, it catches dirt like a magnet, and the gear box is a joke, need I say more...

And it costs a lot of money... it's not worth it at all. And the service center is the bigger joke, you are better off going to some one else, they have no clue what they are doing or they just don't want to...

General Comments:

It's a pile of crap...

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 30th June, 2008

2007 Chery QQ EZ drive 0.8 from Egypt

Model year2007
Year of manufacture2007
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 0.8 Automatic
Performance marks 2 / 10
Reliability marks 2 / 10
Comfort marks 2 / 10
Dealer Service marks 1 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
2.2 / 10
Distance when acquired10200 kilometres
Previous carDaewoo Lanos

Summary:

Not good at all, and don't recommend it to anybody

Faults:

I faced many problems with the clutch during changing speed, as the car made strange noises.

Also the front exhaust pipe has many problems, and makes a loud noise.

General Comments:

The car in unreliable.

Also the service center gives very poor after sales service; each time I go there for maintenance, I found people fighting there. Also each time I receive my car after maintenance with same problems it had when it went in.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 3rd April, 2008

26th Aug 2008, 22:30

Hahaha... rubbish is always rubbish mate... what you need to do is... throw it away from your life...

25th Jan 2010, 03:38

I totally agree with you.

The Ez-drive transmission is rubbish in this car and fails miserably after about 7000 kms.

I had the car for almost 4 years now, and I go to the dealer every 2-3 months because of transmission problems.

Now I'm in contact with the consumer protection agency in Egypt to complain. The transmission and the dealer are just crap.

2005 Chery QQ EZDrive 0.8 from Egypt

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 0.8 Semi-Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired240 kilometres
Most recent distance850 kilometres
Previous carFiat Regata

Summary:

Good sensible small car

Faults:

The internal boot release stopped working, will fix on my next visit to the dealer.

General Comments:

Well, after driving my chery QQ EZDrive for 450 kms, I feel I can give some points on my experience.

1st, the car is certainly very good. I had a lot of fear buying a chinese car, but I think it is no worse than any egyptian (127, Uno), indian (Alto, Zen) or korean (Matiz) assembled car.

1. The Seating:

The seating is a little high, which gives a nice view of the road. The chair is more comfortable than my Regata, but less than the Toyota Yaris I sat in once. But good and comfy overall. My pregnant wife sits nice and comfy too. I always put on seatbelt, and it is not a bother at all, and is smooth, more than my Regata. My old mother sat in the back and was comfortable enough. Not as much room as bigger cars in the back, but you won't feel cramped.

2. The Boot:

It's very small compared to my Regata. 190 litres vs 513 litres for my Regata, but the rear seats fold 60/40 to give a flat floor, which I think compensates, and will be very useful someday. Also 190 litres are enough for shopping bags and some small handbags.

One thing that upsets me is that the internal release of the boot stopped working. I know that it is minor and will be fixed in my next visit to the dealer, but still it bothers me.

3. The Interior:

All the switches and knobs feel of good quality. I feel they can last well.

The low beam light switch is placed a little far away on the dash, which is annoying, but most other switches are within reach and work well.

I have 4 electric windows and they work fine. Also the wipers. The water at the front wipers sprays very low, so cleaning the windshield with the wipers is not always enough, you have to pour water yourself to reach the high end of the windshield. The rear wiper works great, and the rear water spray reaches all the glass well. The fit and finish is good at best. Nothing really bad, but as I said just good.

The interior space is fine. It is actually larger inside than the external dimensions would say. Front leg space is good, rear leg space is adequate.

4. The Engine:

I'm still in the run in period for the 1st 1000 kms, but I have reached 90 kms in the car. I feel the acceleration and speed are more than adequate, and a little more than I expected from a 3 cylinder 52 hp engine. I went up slopes with 3 people in the car including me, and with minimal planning, I can take the slope with no loss in speed at all.

The car is an automatic, so I believe a manual that is run in should be even better on slopes. Start stop traffic acceleration is good, and I rarely feel left behind, but in the end I'm not really trying to win any races.

Fuel consumbtion is just great. On my first fill up, I did 397 kms with 21 litres. Much much better than my Regata, which did 160 kms with 20 litres. NOTE: approx. 44.5 miles per gallon

This car is great for the rising price of petrol. This was done with 70% highway and 30% city driving, but I do have a heavy foot and accelerate a lot.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 27th April, 2006

30th Apr 2006, 06:12

I'm the original poster.

I went today to the dealer for the 1000 kms service. I paid for the oil and filter, but not for the work. they fixed the boot release and the A/c, it was a little weak, but now is much better. as the run in period is now over, I took the car to 100 km/h and started driving aggressively. the car doesn't disappoint. just the usb port in the car fried my IPOD!!! and a flash disk. they should either cover it or provide an mp3 player that works with this usb port. anyhow, nice car, but a somewhat inexperienced dealer.

Average review marks: 5.0 / 10, based on 7 reviews


Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews